a qualitative dataset without losing depth) B1\n- Applies this strength to Maya's study (e.g. allows her to systematically categorize the unique, personal coping strategies described by the ten PTSD patients in their interviews into clear, overarching themes) B1\n- Identifies a generic weakness of thematic analysis (e.g. the process of generating codes and themes is highly subjective and depends heavily on interpretation, leading to potential researcher bias) B1\n- Applies this weakness to Maya's study (e.g. Maya may selectively focus on themes that support her expectations or hypotheses about PTSD recovery, whilst unintentionally overlooking other coping mechanisms in the transcripts) B1","marks":4,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"tableImages":[],"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null,"walkthroughVideo":null},{"id":"ae277e0a-afff-432b-932c-562c9a62b4d6","revisionId":"ab433394-d57e-4bdc-9f3d-b4fcb7411d6c","questionNumber":null,"questionType":"LA","specification":"A cognitive psychologist investigated whether inhaling peppermint essential oil during study increases memory recall. Table 1 shows the memory recall test scores (out of 15) of 10 participants measured before and after inhaling the peppermint oil.\n\n### Table 1: Memory recall score (out of 15) before and after inhaling peppermint oil\n\n| Participant | Recall score before | Recall score after |\n|---|---|---|\n| Participant A | 8 | 11 |\n| Participant B | 10 | 10 |\n| Participant C | 7 | 9 |\n| Participant D | 12 | 14 |\n| Participant E | 9 | 9 |\n| Participant F | 6 | 11 |\n| Participant G | 11 | 13 |\n| Participant H | 13 | 10 |\n| Participant I | 5 | 8 |\n| Participant J | 10 | 12 |\n\nWhen using a Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test to analyze the difference, the calculated value of $T$ was found to be 6 ($T = 6$).\n\n### Table 2: Critical values of $T$ for the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test\n\n| $N$ | $p \\le 0.05$ (one-tailed) | $p \\le 0.05$ (two-tailed) |\n|---|---|---|\n| 7 | 3 | 2 |\n| 8 | 5 | 3 |\n| 9 | 8 | 5 |\n| 10 | 11 | 8 |","difficulty":7,"difficultyBand":"medium","totalMarks":3,"sourceTitle":null,"calculatorUse":null,"isCalculation":true,"parts":[{"id":"5ab662a4-3fb0-4557-9347-f8a2d4c18ce0","label":null,"content":"Using the data in Table 1 and Table 2, explain whether the results are significant at $p \\le 0.05$ for a directional (one-tailed) hypothesis, and if the researcher's directional hypothesis can be accepted.","markscheme":"- Identifies the correct $N$ value ($N = 8$) by omitting the two ties (Participant B and Participant E) M1\n- States that the critical value of $T$ is $5$ (for $N = 8$, $p \\le 0.05$ one-tailed) A1\n- Concludes that because the calculated value ($T = 6$) is greater than the critical value ($5$), the result is not statistically significant and the researcher's directional hypothesis cannot be accepted (the null hypothesis is retained) A1","marks":3,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"tableImages":[],"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null,"walkthroughVideo":null}],"subjectCode":"a_level_psychology","summaries":[{"id":"00ac1c83-b650-417e-b782-4088f685372c","difficultyBand":"medium","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":4},{"id":"01e05597-9a97-43cb-8351-edc4d4a053af","difficultyBand":"easy","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":2},{"id":"02dcc75c-1a18-448a-a4fc-75e5cfa18277","difficultyBand":"easy","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":2},{"id":"030ce91f-4a14-4bb7-96b0-0896b74b2201","difficultyBand":"easy","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":2},{"id":"034a23b3-d60d-48e5-8425-4fd82c2c1213","difficultyBand":"easy","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":3},{"id":"0451f333-feb1-4a65-ba83-dccc7eb53b02","difficultyBand":"easy","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":2},{"id":"06080c27-2069-489b-9ee0-74c6fab52928","difficultyBand":"medium","calculatorUse":null,"totalMarks":3},{"id":"064a4b0a-9a9e-444f-847e-d8ed283b41e3","difficultyBand":"easy","calculatorU

Methods

Question 166

Methods Questions

Methods

Question 166

Methods Questions