ask performance score is lower when notifications are present ($62.10$) than absent ($75.80$) M1\n- Explains that the presence of active notifications distracts participants, leading to poorer cognitive performance A1\n- Identifies that the mean situational anxiety rating is higher when notifications are present ($6.42$) than absent ($3.12$) M1\n- Explains that receiving or expecting notifications during a test raises stress levels and physiological anxiety A1\n- Identifies that the standard deviations are higher in the 'present' condition for both performance ($12.45$ vs $8.12$) and anxiety ($1.95$ vs $1.05$) M1\n- Explains that participants react more variedly to notifications, whereas performance and anxiety are more consistent when notifications are absent A1","marks":6,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"tableImages":[],"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null,"walkthroughVideo":null},{"id":"7b58d7ba-87fc-4cfe-9e06-10588f8cb763","revisionId":"f26aa397-3af7-4b75-bd1c-62c015054c31","questionNumber":null,"questionType":"LA","specification":"Dr. Aris is investigating the psychological adaptation of winter-over research scientists working in extreme isolation at an Antarctic research station. She has gathered qualitative data from personal audio logs recorded by the scientists over a six-month period. Dr. Aris plans to use thematic analysis to analyse this data.","difficulty":5,"difficultyBand":"medium","totalMarks":4,"sourceTitle":null,"calculatorUse":null,"isCalculation":false,"parts":[{"id":"feb7d1fd-3e54-4f85-b55f-e450c9c2bee6","label":null,"content":"Explain one strength and one weakness of Dr. Aris using thematic analysis to analyse her data.","markscheme":"- Identifies a strength of thematic analysis, such as its flexibility in handling rich qualitative data, allowing unexpected themes to emerge without being restricted by pre-existing theoretical frameworks B1\n- Applies this strength to Dr. Aris's study (e.g., it allows her to discover novel, unanticipated coping mechanisms or psychological adaptation strategies directly from the scientists' spoken words in the audio logs) A1\n- Identifies a weakness of thematic analysis, such as the high subjectivity involved in coding and theme identification, which can lead to researcher bias B1\n- Applies this weakness to Dr. Aris's study (e.g., Dr. Aris's own expectations about the negative effects of winter-over syndrome or extreme isolation could cause her to selectively highlight themes of seasonal depression while overlooking positive or neutral comments in the audio logs) A1","marks":4,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"tableImages":[],"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null,"walkthroughVideo":null},{"id":"7bdaa797-4a14-4789-8aec-08acb933b2cd","revisionId":"b7e9a98d-08af-446c-bab6-3f00f4dbaf3a","questionNumber":null,"questionType":"LA","specification":"","difficulty":6,"difficultyBand":"medium","totalMarks":4,"sourceTitle":null,"calculatorUse":null,"isCalculation":false,"parts":[{"id":"26211f3f-8dfa-4d37-8c9f-24ad024dfbaa","label":null,"content":"$3f","markscheme":"- Explains the core mechanism: the researchers' manuscript is sent to independent academic experts (peers) in the same field of clinical psychology and immersive technology to assess its validity, methodology, and scientific merit. B1\n- Explains the single-blind process: the reviewers will know the identities of the researchers, but the reviewers remain anonymous to the researchers to allow for unbiased, honest feedback. B1\n- Outlines the decision process: reviewers will submit recommendations (such as accept, reject, or request major/minor revisions) to the JITCW journal editor, who makes the final decision. M1\n- Evaluates the likelihood of publication: there is a **low likelihood** of publication because, althou

Methods

Question 116

Methods Questions

Methods

Question 116

Methods Questions