Can I compare an Eduqas grade 4 directly with a CCEA grade C?

They are broad reporting benchmarks, but their marks are not directly equivalent. Eduqas uses combined raw marks out of $240$; CCEA combines converted unit marks on a UMS out of $400$.

What were the Eduqas GCSE Maths grade 4 boundaries in June 2025?

The grade $4$ boundary was $111$ marks on foundation tier and $27$ marks on higher tier, each from a maximum qualification total of $240$.

Does CCEA GCSE Maths use grades 9 to 1?

No. The CCEA specification discussed here uses lettered grades A*--G and includes C*. Students should not apply an English grades $9$--$1$ boundary table to a CCEA result.

Why does CCEA use UMS for GCSE Maths?

UMS allows marks from different units and examination series to be combined on a common reporting scale. Raw marks are converted before the final qualification grade is calculated.

When are GCSE maths grade boundaries confirmed?

Official boundaries are published with results information after marking and awarding have been completed. Previous boundaries can guide revision, but they cannot confirm the boundary for a future series.

GCSE Maths Eduqas vs CCEA Grade Boundaries

Results day has a strange way of making one number feel like the whole story. Yet when comparing GCSE maths Eduqas vs CCEA grade boundaries, the numbers do not even speak the same language. Eduqas uses grades $9$ -- $1$ and combines raw marks from two linear papers. CCEA uses lettered grades, including C*, and converts unit marks to a Uniform Mark Scale (UMS).

The short answer is simple: you cannot compare Eduqas and CCEA boundaries mark for mark. Their grading scales, assessment structures and methods of combining results are different. You must first identify the board, tier, examination series and units taken.

A student choosing between Eduqas and CCEA trains on results day

Results day comparison checklist

Before interpreting a result, check:

whether the qualification is Eduqas or CCEA;
the examination series shown on the statement of results;
foundation or higher tier for Eduqas;
the CCEA unit combination, such as M2 and M6 or M4 and M8;
whether a figure is a raw mark, UMS mark or overall grade;
the boundaries for the correct year, rather than a prediction based on an older paper.

MathsGenie's GCSE grade boundaries centre is a useful starting point when checking the board and series.

Eduqas vs CCEA at a glance

Feature	Eduqas GCSE Mathematics	CCEA GCSE Mathematics
Grading scale	Grades $9$ -- $1$	Grades A--G, including C
Qualification structure	Linear qualification with two components	Unitised qualification formed from two units
Assessment weighting	Each component is worth $50%50\%$	First unit is worth $45%45\%$ and completion unit is worth $55%55\%$
Calculator arrangement	One non-calculator and one calculator component	Initial unit uses a calculator; completion unit contains non-calculator and calculator papers
Combining marks	Raw component marks combine to a total out of $240$	Raw unit marks are converted to UMS and combined out of $400$
Boundary interpretation	Use the overall qualification boundary	Check unit conversion and overall UMS award rules

The Eduqas GCSE Maths revision hub and CCEA GCSE Maths revision hub keep board-specific resources separate, which matters because the paper structures are not interchangeable.

Eduqas grade boundaries for June 2025

The latest completed summer series at the time of writing is June 2025. Eduqas Mathematics had a maximum total of $240$ marks across two components worth $120$ marks each.

Tier	$9$	$8$	$7$	$6$	$5$	$4$	$3$	$2$	$1$
Higher	$196$	$155$	$115$	$85$	$56$	$27$	$12$	--	--
Foundation	--	--	--	--	$141$	$111$	$81$	$51$	$21$

These are overall qualification boundaries, not targets for each individual paper. Eduqas also publishes notional component boundaries, but those are intended for analysis rather than awarding separate component grades.

For historical comparisons and November series data, use the dedicated Eduqas GCSE Maths grade boundaries. The accompanying Eduqas predicted grade calculator can help with mock analysis, but an estimate is not an official result.

How CCEA grade boundaries work

CCEA's structure makes a single raw-mark table misleading. Students take one unit from M1--M4 and an appropriate completion unit from M5--M8. Raw boundaries are set for individual units, then raw marks are converted to UMS before the final award is calculated.

The overall qualification has a maximum of $400$ UMS. Published CCEA guidance gives these subject-level thresholds:

CCEA grade	Minimum overall UMS
A	$320$
B	$292$
C*	$268$
C	$240$
D	$200$
E	$160$
F	$120$
G	$80$

A* is awarded at qualification level through the M4 and M8 route and depends on performance in the relevant examination series. Therefore, students should use CCEA's official unit conversion information rather than assuming that a fixed raw percentage guarantees A*.

Students trying to weigh incomparable Eduqas and CCEA paperwork

What the comparison really tells you

An Eduqas grade $4$ and a CCEA grade C are commonly treated as broad reporting benchmarks, while Eduqas grade $7$ and CCEA grade A are often grouped in national results summaries. That does not make their raw boundaries equivalent.

For example, dividing an Eduqas boundary by $240$ produces a percentage of available raw marks. Dividing a CCEA UMS threshold by $400$ produces a percentage of the uniform scale. Those calculations describe different things because UMS is a reporting scale created after raw unit boundaries have been established.

The useful comparison is structural:

Eduqas students should total both component marks and use the correct tier table.
CCEA students should check both unit results, their UMS values and the permitted grade range for their unit combination.
Everyone should use boundaries from the actual examination series shown on the result.

Common mistakes on GCSE maths results day

Comparing raw totals directly

A CCEA UMS total is not the same as an Eduqas raw total. Even when two figures look similar, their denominators and purposes differ.

Using the wrong Eduqas tier

Foundation and higher have separate boundaries. Foundation offers grades $1$ -- $5$ , while higher normally covers grades $4$ -- $9$ , with a possible grade $3$ for a narrowly missed grade $4$ boundary under the specification rules.

Treating component boundaries as final grades

Eduqas awards one qualification grade from the combined result. Notional paper boundaries are diagnostic guides, not independent grades.

Ignoring the CCEA unit pathway

M1 and M5, M2 and M6, M3 and M7, and M4 and M8 target different grade ranges. The unit combination affects which final grades are available.

Assuming last year's boundary will repeat

Raw boundaries can move because papers vary in demand. Historical data is helpful for planning, but it cannot confirm a future grade.

Takeaway for students and teachers

Grade boundaries are best understood as a translation tool, not a revision target. They translate performance in one examination series into a grade after the papers have been marked and reviewed.

On results day, begin with the board and assessment structure. Eduqas requires the correct total out of $240$ ; CCEA requires the relevant unit and UMS information. If anything appears inconsistent, ask the school's examinations officer to confirm the component or unit breakdown before considering a review of marking.

For the next examination series, turn the comparison back into action. Start from free GCSE Maths revision resources, practise with board-specific questions and mark schemes, then build examination stamina using GCSE predicted papers. MathsGenie brings revision lessons, past papers, predicted papers, practice questions, mini tests and video solutions together so that your next result is shaped by preparation rather than boundary guesswork.