Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

2.6 The international economy (A-level only)

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132
Question 110

Context 2: Monetary Integration and the Eurozone

Extract C: Exchange rate of the Polish Złoty (PLN) against the Euro (€)

DatePLN per €1
1 Jan4.52
1 Mar4.78
1 May4.95
1 Jul4.72
1 Sep4.61
1 Nov4.48
31 Dec4.38

Extract D

In recent years, Poland’s economy has navigated a complex macroeconomic landscape. While maintaining robust long-term growth, the country has faced domestic inflationary pressures and global supply-chain realignments. Because Germany and other Eurozone nations are Poland's primary trading partners, developments in the wider European market heavily dictate the health of Poland's industrial and manufacturing sectors.

Affected by these regional shifts, the Polish złoty (PLN) has experienced notable volatility against the single currency. In the space of less than a year, the exchange rate fluctuated from 4.52 PLN per €1 to nearly 5.00 PLN, before strengthening back towards 4.38 PLN. This volatility has generated mixed outcomes across the economy. Polish households consuming imported goods and tourists travelling abroad faced sudden drops in purchasing power during the periods of depreciation. Conversely, domestic manufacturers, heavily integrated into supply chains for automotive parts and electronics, initially found their external competitiveness enhanced by a weaker złoty.

However, a persistently fluctuating currency introduces friction. Financial market speculators often trade the złoty based on short-term sentiment rather than macroeconomic fundamentals. Furthermore, the Narodowy Bank Polski (NBP) has occasionally found its monetary policy path diverging from that of the European Central Bank (ECB), leading to capital flows that compound exchange rate volatility.

This continuous volatility has reignited debate over whether Poland should fulfill its treaty obligation to adopt the euro. Proponents of the single currency argue that joining the Eurozone would permanently eliminate transaction costs, completely remove exchange rate risk for exporters, and lower long-term borrowing costs by placing Poland under the monetary umbrella of the ECB. This, they claim, would accelerate foreign direct investment (FDI) from Western Europe.

On the other hand, opponents warn against the permanent loss of monetary sovereignty. Giving up the złoty means the NBP would surrender the power to set independent interest rates tailored to Poland's specific inflation and growth trajectory. Critics also argue that a floating exchange rate serves as a vital macroeconomic shock absorber, allowing the currency to automatically depreciate during external crises to preserve domestic employment and export competitiveness. They caution that once the exchange rate is locked in, the economy loses this flexible adjustment mechanism, forcing any future competitiveness corrections to occur through painful 'internal devaluations'—such as wage stagnation and fiscal austerity.

Ultimately, deciding to join a monetary union is not merely a technical choice but a structural shift with permanent macroeconomic consequences.

Extract D notes that deciding to join a monetary union is 'a structural shift with permanent macroeconomic consequences.'

Using the data and your economic knowledge, to what extent do you agree with the view that the Polish economy would benefit if the euro were to be adopted by Poland at some point in the future?

[25]
Markscheme

2.6 The international economy (A-level only) Questions

  1. A Level
  2. /Economics
  3. /2.6 The international economy (A-level only)

310 exam-style questions on AQA A Level Economics 2.6 The international economy (A-level only), covering 2.6.1 Globalisation, 2.6.2 Trade, 2.6.3 The balance of payments, 2.6.4 Exchange rate systems, and 2.6.5 Economic growth and development. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank