Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

2 Component 2: Non-fiction and Transactional Writing

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287
Question 162

The recipe’s missing minute

Text: an original contemporary personal-account-style practice extract.

The old recipe told me to beat the mixture until it looked right. It supplied a weight for the flour, a temperature for the oven and absolutely no definition of right. I had followed the first two instructions with the confidence of someone who owned a measuring scale. At the bowl, confidence became a spoon held above a doubtful surface.

My grandmother had added a pencilled line in the margin: stop when the trail stays briefly. I lifted the spoon again. The mixture left a stripe that disappeared at once. After another minute, the stripe remained long enough to see. The instruction made sense when attached to an action. Reading it at the kitchen table had not supplied the small sequence of looking, trying and looking again.

The cake was uneven, though its middle was cooked. I wrote the extra minute beside the pencilled note, then crossed it out. Next time the ingredients might be colder, or I might beat them differently. I kept a description instead: the surface should remember the spoon for a moment. It was a less exact instruction than a number, and a more useful one.

Analyse how the writer uses language and structure to interest and engage the reader.

In your answer, consider:

  • language features and techniques
  • structural techniques
  • the effect on the reader.

Support your views with detailed reference to the extract.

[15]
Markscheme

2 Component 2: Non-fiction and Transactional Writing Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /2 Component 2: Non-fiction and Transactional Writing

Question bank