Mendeleev ordered the elements by mass but let chemical behaviour fix the columns
Periodic table
A chart of all the elements arranged in order of increasing atomic number, so that elements with similar properties fall in the same column.
- Dmitri Mendeleev arranged the elements known in the 1860s using their properties and the properties of their compounds.
- He worked mostly in order of increasing relative atomic mass, starting a new row whenever similar chemical behaviour appeared again.
- Elements that reacted in similar ways and formed compounds of similar formulae were placed in the same column.
- The columns showed that chemical properties repeat at regular intervals, which is what makes the arrangement periodic.
- Where an element did not fit, he trusted the chemical evidence rather than force it into the wrong column.
- He left a gap instead of filling a position with an element whose chemistry did not match its neighbours.
- Chemical evidence decided where an element belonged whenever mass order gave an awkward pattern.
- Gaps marked positions that Mendeleev expected a future element to fill.
Gaps in the table became testable predictions
- Properties change in a regular way across a row and then repeat when the next row begins.
- A gap therefore sits between elements whose properties bracket the missing one.
- Mendeleev estimated a missing element's relative atomic mass from the elements on either side of the gap.
- He predicted physical properties such as density and melting point from the same pattern.
- He predicted the formulae of the compounds that the missing element would form.
- He named two predicted elements eka-aluminium and eka-silicon, after the elements directly above them.
- Gallium and germanium were discovered later and fell into exactly those two positions.
- Eka-aluminium: predicted relative atomic mass near 686868 and density near 5.9 g cm−35.9\ \text{g cm}^{-3}5.9 g cm−3.
- Gallium, isolated in 1875, has a relative atomic mass of 69.769.769.7 and a density of 5.9 g cm−35.9\ \text{g cm}^{-3}5.9 g cm−3.
- Eka-silicon: predicted relative atomic mass near 727272 and density near 5.5 g cm−35.5\ \text{g cm}^{-3}5.5 g cm−3.
- Germanium, isolated in 1886, has a relative atomic mass of 72.672.672.6 and a density of 5.3 g cm−35.3\ \text{g cm}^{-3}5.3 g cm−3.
Isotope abundance explains the pairs that sit out of mass order
Isotope
Atoms of the same element with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons.
Relative atomic mass
The weighted mean mass of an element's atoms, taking the abundance of each isotope into account, compared with one-twelfth of the mass of a carbon-12 atom.
- A sample of an element contains its isotopes in fixed proportions, and those proportions set the value of ArA_rAr.
- A common isotope pulls the average towards its own mass far more strongly than a rare one does.
- For a few neighbouring pairs the averages come out in the opposite order to the one their chemistry demands.
- In today's table argon has Ar≈39.9A_r \approx 39.9Ar≈39.9 and potassium Ar≈39.1A_r \approx 39.1Ar≈39.1, yet argon is an unreactive gas and potassium a reactive metal.
- Argon was not isolated until 1894, so that pair belongs to the modern table rather than to Mendeleev's.
- Mendeleev himself reversed two such pairs, putting cobalt (58.958.958.9) before nickel (58.758.758.7) and tellurium (127.6127.6127.6) before iodine (126.9126.9126.9).
- Ordering by atomic number removes every one of these exceptions, but that idea arrived after Mendeleev's work.
- Mendeleev did not ignore relative atomic mass, because increasing mass is the order he used almost everywhere.
- Isotope abundance is the cause and chemical behaviour is the evidence, so the two do different jobs in an explanation.
Why the later discoveries counted as evidence
- The predictions were published before the elements were found, so they could not have been fitted to the results afterwards.
- Gallium and germanium matched the predicted masses and densities closely.
- A table that predicts unknown facts carries more weight than one that only organises known facts.
- The gaps closed one by one as more elements were isolated.
- The pairs still out of mass order were explained once atomic number replaced relative atomic mass as the ordering rule.
- An answer about an out-of-order pair is worth writing in two parts:
- the isotope abundances that make the relative atomic masses come out that way,
- the chemical properties that decided the final position.
- Naming the actual pair, such as tellurium before iodine, is stronger than describing the problem in general terms.
- What two kinds of evidence did Mendeleev use when he placed an element?
- Why did Mendeleev leave gaps rather than fill every position?
- Which measured properties of gallium supported his prediction for eka-aluminium?
- Why does isotope abundance put a few pairs out of relative atomic mass order?
- Why did the discovery of germanium strengthen the case for the table?