Skip to content
MathsGenie logo
Open app

Course home

  1. A Level
  2. Economics Edexcel A
  3. Question bank

3.4 Market structures

EasyMediumHard
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334
Question 33

Figure 1: UK market share of Ultra-Rapid Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Networks (150kW+)

OperatorCharging TierCharger OutputMarket share of operatorMarket share of productPrice (p/kWh)
VoltChargeAll VoltCharge45.0%
Volt-Standard150 kW26.0%50
Volt-Max350 kW14.0%65
Volt-Extreme450 kW5.0%75
ElectronGridAll ElectronGrid35.5%
Grid-Standard150 kW24.5%52
Grid-Hyper350 kW11.0%68
AmpereGoAmpere-Rapid150 kW12.5%48
OtherOther7.0%

Extract A

The effects of a ban on dynamic surge pricing for ultra-rapid EV charging networks

Ultra-rapid electric vehicle (EV) charging networks operating at 150kW or above tend to be sold in highly concentrated infrastructure markets. To shield consumers from extreme price fluctuations during peak travel times, regulatory bodies are introducing a ban on real-time dynamic pricing at highway stations. Under the new rules, charging operators must publish a single, fixed standard rate per kilowatt-hour (kWh) that cannot be altered dynamically based on instantaneous grid loads, congestion, or peak demand hours.

There are three main factors that will determine the economic impact of this regulatory intervention: first, whether dynamic pricing previously served to expand overall network utilization or merely allowed operators to capture consumer surplus during high-demand windows. Secondly, how competing networks adjust their baseline fixed tariffs in response to losing dynamic optimization. Thirdly, what alternative charging options (such as overnight slow home charging or workplace hubs) drivers substitute toward.

Economic modelling indicates that under a fixed-rate mandate, total highway charging volume (measured in megawatt-hours) would decline by approximately 15% due to the loss of peak-management flexibility, or by only 9% if operators engage in aggressive baseline tariff cuts to keep their chargers highly utilized throughout the day. This pricing response, however, risks triggering a mutually destructive price war among the dominant charging giants, eroding industry margins and slowing down long-term infrastructure investment.


In Extract A, it is suggested that some operators may respond to the ban on dynamic surge pricing by cutting their baseline fixed tariffs.

Using game theory and the information provided in Figure 1 and Extract A, discuss the effects on firms of cutting tariffs in an oligopolistic market.

[12]

3.4 Market structures Questions

  1. A Level
  2. /Economics
  3. /3.4 Market structures