Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

2.1 The measurement of macroeconomic performance

EasyMediumHard
12345678910111213141516171819202122
Question 15

Context 2: Balancing the Macroeconomic Scales

Extract A

In recent years, several emerging market economies have grappled with volatile inflationary pressures. For instance, in Turkey, unorthodox monetary policies—specifically cutting interest rates despite soaring inflation—led to inflation rates exceeding 80% in late 2022. This triggered severe currency depreciation, eroded domestic purchasing power, and discouraged foreign direct investment. Critics argued that the central bank’s failure to prioritise inflation destabilised the entire economy.

Conversely, in response to rising global energy and food prices, many central banks in advanced economies, including the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, raised interest rates at the fastest pace in decades. This aggressive monetary tightening successfully began to anchor inflation expectations, but it concurrently raised the risk of widespread recession, increased government borrowing costs, and squeezed households with legacy mortgage debt.

Historically, central banks have maintained that price stability is a prerequisite for sustained economic growth. During the stagflation of the 1970s, many nations learned that tolerating higher inflation did not yield permanently higher employment. Consequently, independent central banks were established with mandate targets typically around 2%. However, critics argue that in an era of supply-side constraints, climate transition challenges, and high public debt, a single-minded focus on inflation targets may unnecessarily penalise employment, investment, and green growth.

Extract B

For much of the decade following the 2008 financial crisis, the primary concern for central banks in advanced economies was not inflation, but deflation. Despite near-zero (and sometimes negative) interest rates and extensive quantitative easing, inflation remained stubbornly below targets. This led to stagnation and concerned policymakers that traditional monetary tools were losing their effectiveness.

During this protracted period of low growth and low inflation, the classic trade-off represented by the Phillips curve appeared to have broken down. Countries like Japan and Germany experienced historically low levels of unemployment alongside negligible wage growth and price inflation. This phenomenon suggested that structural factors—such as globalisation, the gig economy, technological automation, and demographic aging—were exerting permanent downward pressure on global prices.

This structural shift has led to debate over whether macroeconomic policy should be reoriented. Some economists propose that instead of aiming for inflation targets, governments and monetary authorities should prioritise nominal GDP targeting, maximum employment, or state-led investment in green infrastructure. They contend that a low and stable inflation rate is a secondary outcome of a healthy, productive economy, rather than its primary driving force.


Extract A states: "Aggressive rate hikes and monetary tightening were implemented to curb runaway inflation, establishing price stability as the absolute priority of macroeconomic policy."

Using the data in the extracts and your knowledge of economics, evaluate the view that maintaining a low and stable rate of inflation should be the primary macroeconomic objective of national governments.

[25]
Markscheme

2.1 The measurement of macroeconomic performance Questions

  1. A Level
  2. /Economics
  3. /2.1 The measurement of macroeconomic performance

187 exam-style questions on AQA A Level Economics 2.1 The measurement of macroeconomic performance, covering 2.1.1 The objectives of government economic policy, 2.1.2 Macroeconomic indicators, 2.1.3 Uses of index numbers, and 2.1.4 Uses of national income data (A-level only). Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank