The reviewer inside the review
Original practice source: a commentary about reviewers’ perspectives.
A review becomes easier to use when the writer explains what they valued and why. A reader can then recognise a different preference rather than treat the verdict as a complete prediction of their own response. The reviewer’s position matters through its connection with the judgement.
A personal introduction can also distract. Knowing a writer’s favourite colour or entire history does not necessarily explain the claim being made now. A useful account supplies relevant context and reasons, without making either an anonymous verdict or an extended self-portrait the only form a review can take.
An arts magazine is inviting articles on the statement: “A good review should tell us as much about the reviewer as about the work.”
Write an article for the magazine arguing your view. You may use ideas from the source and your own ideas.
60 exam-style questions on Oxford AQA IGCSE English Language 2.2 Section B: Directed writing, covering 2.2.1 Writing for audience and purpose, 2.2.2 Responding to multiple and diverse demands, and 2.2.3 Writing linked to the Section A sources. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.