Skip to content

Course home

2.5.6 Limitations of bonding models and representations

2.5.6 Limitations of bonding models and representations

Every model shows some things and hides others

Definition

Model

A simplified representation of something that cannot be observed directly, built to show one kind of information about it.

  1. Chemists describe particles through models, because the particles themselves are far too small to observe directly.
  2. Each one is built to show a single kind of information clearly, and gives up others to do so.
  3. Judging a model means asking what it was designed to show, rather than whether it is a perfect picture.
  4. No single representation shows particles, electrons, forces, sizes and shapes all at once.
  5. Two models used together often cover each other's gaps.
Key Idea
  • A model can be useful and limited at the same time.
  • The right model depends on the question, whether that is about electrons, connections or shape.

Dot-and-cross diagrams: electrons yes, shape and scale no

  1. A dot-and-cross diagram shows the outer-shell electrons and which atom each one came from.
  2. For a covalent molecule it shows the shared pairs, so the number of bonds is clear.
  3. For an ionic compound it shows the electrons transferred and the charges that result.
  4. It leaves out the nucleus and the inner-shell electrons.
  5. It is flat, so it shows no three-dimensional shape and no bond angles.
  6. Symbol sizes and spacings are chosen for readability, so nothing in it is drawn to scale.
  7. For an ionic compound it shows one pair of ions rather than the repeating lattice.
Common Mistake
  • The dots and crosses stand for electrons, not for the atoms themselves.
  • Electrons do not sit still in fixed spots, so the drawn positions record ownership rather than location.

Ball-and-stick models: shape yes, scale and electrons no

  1. A ball-and-stick model shows which atoms are joined and roughly how they sit in three dimensions.
  2. It gives a usable impression of the bond angles.
  3. The balls are drawn far apart relative to their size, so the spacing is wrong.
  4. Real atoms are not solid coloured spheres, and the colours are a labelling convention.
  5. The sticks show that a bond exists but say nothing about shared or transferred electrons.
  6. Atoms at the back can be hidden from any one viewing angle.
  7. For an ionic compound it can show the lattice arrangement but not the charges or the attractions.
Example
  • Water: a ball-and-stick model shows two hydrogen atoms joined to one oxygen atom at an angle.
  • What it hides: the two lone pairs on oxygen, the true relative sizes of the atoms, and the real distance between the nuclei.

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional representations

  1. A two-dimensional drawing shows which atoms are joined and how many bonds each one has.
  2. It cannot show depth, so atoms nearer and further away look alike.
  3. A three-dimensional model or drawing shows the spatial arrangement and the approximate bond angles.
  4. It can still distort atom sizes, bond lengths and the spaces between particles.
  5. One viewing angle can hide atoms or make separate bonds appear to overlap.
  6. A flat drawing is not wrong merely for being flat, and its limitation is the missing depth.
Note
  • A flat drawing is not wrong for being flat, and its limitation is the missing depth.
  • Scale is the safest limitation to reach for, since nothing in this topic is drawn to scale.

Choosing and combining models

  1. Use a dot-and-cross diagram when the question is about electrons, bonds or charges.
  2. Use a ball-and-stick model when the question is about shape or arrangement.
  3. Use a two-dimensional drawing when the question is only about which atoms are joined.
  4. Use two models together when the question needs both the electrons and the shape.
  5. Name the limitation that matters for the question rather than listing every limitation the model has.
Exam technique
  • A limitation comes in two parts: what the representation does show, then the specific feature it leaves out.
  • Calling a model inaccurate on its own leaves the answer unfinished, because the missing feature is the point.
  • Naming the representation first keeps the limitation attached to the right model.
Self review
  • What does a dot-and-cross diagram show that a ball-and-stick model does not?
  • Why can a dot-and-cross diagram not show the shape of a molecule?
  • Why are the balls and sticks in a ball-and-stick model not drawn to scale?
  • What information does a two-dimensional drawing leave out?
  • Why is it useful to have more than one representation of the same substance?
PreviousNext

How was this guide?

Teach Genie

Review 2.5.6 Limitations of bonding models and representations by teaching Genie

Teach it back in your own words, spot gaps, and remember it better.

Start teaching
Genie and Baby Genie

Lesson

Recap your knowledge with an interactive lesson

8 minute activity

Start lesson

A model is a simplified representation of something that cannot be observed directly. Chemists use models because particles and electrons are too small to observe directly.

Every model is designed to show particular information clearly, so it must leave other information out. A model can therefore be useful and limited at the same time.

The best model depends on the question. A dot-and-cross diagram is useful for electrons and charges, while a ball-and-stick model is useful for three-dimensional shape and arrangement.

Flashcards

Remember key concepts with flashcards

21 flashcards

Practice flashcards

Why do chemists use models to describe particles?

2.5.6 Limitations of bonding models and representations Revision Guide

  1. GCSE
  2. /Chemistry
  3. /2.5.6 Limitations of bonding models and representations

Revision notes for Edexcel GCSE Chemistry 2.5.6 Limitations of bonding models and representations: explanations and worked examples.

Revision guides