-a483-c3c768a22dbb","questionNumber":null,"questionType":"LA","specification":"$44","difficulty":3,"difficultyBand":"medium","totalMarks":5,"sourceTitle":null,"calculatorUse":null,"parts":[{"id":"7f3aa774-67d5-4f6d-9075-0dfd15492c44","label":null,"content":"Explain what is meant by the 'unintended consequence' (Extract B, line 8) of the synthetic textile levy.","markscheme":"- Defines 'unintended consequence' as an unforeseen, unplanned, and typically negative side-effect of a government intervention designed to correct a market failure B1\n- Identifies that unintended consequences are a key characteristic of government failure, where the intervention causes further market distortions or costs B1\n- Explains that the intended goal of the levy (£1.50 charge on non-recycled synthetic fibers) was to discourage synthetic garments and reduce environmental waste M1\n- Identifies the unintended consequence from Extract B: consumers bypassing the domestic tax by purchasing directly from overseas e-commerce platforms exploiting customs loopholes A1\n- Explains how this causes further market distortion and failure: harming domestic retail competitiveness (causing local shop closures) and potentially increasing environmental damage via long-distance shipping emissions A1","marks":5,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null},{"id":"bfb2f4bc-1db5-40d9-9719-fa823ead8e71","revisionId":"d908e4ec-2623-4848-9c43-e107abaa62f0","questionNumber":null,"questionType":"LA","specification":"","difficulty":3,"difficultyBand":"medium","totalMarks":3,"sourceTitle":null,"calculatorUse":null,"parts":[{"id":"b8ef6481-de85-4ba9-a905-1da4c53359ed","label":null,"content":"Explain **one** measure the Spanish government could use to reduce the impact of groundwater extraction from the Doñana National Park wetlands.","markscheme":"- Identifies a valid measure (e.g. closing illegal boreholes/wells, imposing strict water abstraction quotas, or subsidising efficient drip-irrigation) B1\n- Explains how the measure works to restrict water extraction (e.g. legally restricting the volume of water farmers can draw from the local aquifer) M1\n- Explains how this reduces the environmental impact on the wetlands (e.g. allowing the water table to rise/stabilise, keeping the surface lagoons hydrated and preserving critical habitats) A1","marks":3,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null},{"id":"e6ad244b-3ac0-4931-a597-1b2b099ca9cd","revisionId":"9f537be7-b6e4-455a-827f-871ccbe80799","questionNumber":null,"questionType":"LA","specification":"","difficulty":4,"difficultyBand":"medium","totalMarks":3,"sourceTitle":null,"calculatorUse":null,"parts":[{"id":"bf31495f-5934-43c6-80c8-259194875119","label":null,"content":"Explain one intervention the Australian government could use to reduce the environmental degradation caused by excessive water extraction for agriculture in the Murray-Darling River Basin.","markscheme":"- Identifies a valid government intervention, such as purchasing environmental water buybacks, establishing strict water extraction caps, or taxing commercial irrigation B1\n- Explains the economic or operational mechanism of the chosen intervention (e.g., government buybacks of water entitlements legally retire these rights from commercial agricultural use, preventing irrigators from drawing that volume) M1\n- Explains how this reduces the negative externality or environmental impact (e.g., by ensuring a greater volume of water remains in the river system to restore natural flow regimes, lower salinity levels, and preserve downstream wetland habitats) A1","marks":3,"order":0,"markingRubric":null,"explanation":null,"options":[]}],"options":[],"explanation":null,"firstAttemptFullMarks":null}],"subjectCode":"a_level_economics__edexce

3.6 Government intervention

Question 4

3.6 Government intervention Questions

3.6 Government intervention

Question 4

3.6 Government intervention Questions