Speed Of Response
How Firms React
- High PES
- Firms can lift output quickly when price rises, so the market clears with only a small price change.
- Low PES
- Firms cannot expand fast, so a rise in demand mainly forces price up and any shortage persists.
- Over time
- As PES rises in the long run, output can expand further, so the market adjusts more fully to the new conditions.
- The higher the PES, the more a change in demand shows up as extra quantity rather than a higher price.
- The lower the PES, the more that same change is bottled up in price, so responsiveness and price stability go together.
- A surge in demand for a manufactured good with spare capacity is met quickly, so its price barely moves from, say, £50.
- The same surge for housing, where PES is low because new homes take years to build, mainly pushes prices up.
Wider Implications
- It explains why some markets absorb demand shocks smoothly while others see sharp price swings.
- Firms with high PES can capture a rise in demand fastest and win extra sales before rivals react.
- It guides governments in judging whether supply will actually respond to a policy or simply raise prices.
Raising Responsiveness
- Firms can raise PES by holding spare capacity or stocks, but both tie up resources and add cost.
- In the short run PES is largely fixed by the nature of production, so quick expansion may be impossible.
- Over the long run investment in new capacity can make supply far more responsive.
Is a high PES always an advantage?
- It clearly helps when demand is rising, because a firm that can lift output fast turns the extra demand into extra sales and revenue while price stays near, say, £50, whereas a rival with rigid supply loses those sales; across the market a high PES also keeps prices stable, which helps households budget and lets a government judge that a policy will raise output rather than just prices.
- But responsiveness is not free, because spare capacity and stocks tie up resources that earn nothing while demand is flat, so a firm facing steady demand pays for flexibility it rarely uses.
- A high PES can also expose a firm in a downturn, because the idle capacity that let it expand now sits unused as a fixed cost, and in the short run much of PES is set by the nature of production, so the choice is often not even open.
- On balance, whether a firm should pursue a higher PES depends on the time horizon and on how variable and predictable its demand is: where demand swings sharply and often, carrying spare capacity is usually justified by the sales it captures, whereas where demand is stable or the asset is long-lived, it is better to let PES rise naturally over the long run than to pay to force it up now.
- Connect a high or low PES to how fast the market clears after a shock.
- Use low PES to explain persistent shortages and sharp price spikes.
- State that PES, and so responsiveness, rises over the long run.
- Do not treat a firm's responsiveness as fixed forever; PES rises over the long run as capacity adjusts.
- Do not ignore the cost of raising PES, since spare capacity and stocks are not free.
- How does a high PES help a firm respond to a rise in demand?
- Why can a low PES cause lasting shortages?
- How does PES change over the long run?
- How might a firm raise its PES, and at what cost?
- Why do some markets absorb demand shocks more smoothly than others?