Skip to content

Literary Hub

Romeo and Juliet
Sign up
  1. Literary Hub
  2. Conflict

Conflict

The big idea

Shakespeare gives the feud no cause and makes its cost the story: kept alive as the old men's habit and a young man's hatred, it is fought and paid for by the young, ending only when both houses lose their heirs, in a 'glooming' peace.

The debate

How far does Shakespeare blame the feud itself for the deaths, rather than the people who keep choosing to fight it?

What it means in Romeo and Juliet

The play never says what the quarrel is about. It is an ‘ancient grudge’, and the Prince can trace its brawls only to ‘an airy word’: something trivial, or something everywhere, and probably both. So 'conflict' here means a feud that is kept going rather than a dispute about anything, and the play's words for it ('grudge', 'mutiny', 'brawls', 'rancor', 'discords', 'enmity') describe a quarrel inside one city, which the Prologue calls ‘civil blood’. The fathers keep its habit, both spoiling to fight at the first noise in 1.1, though Capulet restrains Tybalt when a fight would shame his feast; Tybalt keeps its hatred; after 3.1 a mother keeps its revenge; and the young pay. Its rules can be built from its lines: make the other side strike first, ‘let them begin’; a drawn sword cannot ‘talk of peace’; an insult such as 'villain' must be answered; a guest is safe ‘Here in my house’; and over all of them the Prince's law, that the next brawl will cost ‘Your lives’. Its sharpest weapon is a name: Juliet argues ‘'Tis but thy name that is my enemy’, and the rest of the play shows how much a name can kill. AQA has asked about it as 'the effects of the conflict between the Capulet and Montague families' (November 2020) and through 'aggressive male behaviour' (June 2017). The June 2026 paper is reported, by a teacher's post-exam piece and a seller's listing, to have been on conflict; AQA has not published it, so its wording and extract are unknown. The theme can also come through Tybalt, Mercutio, the Prince, either family or the ending. Whatever the question's word, follow who pays.

The shape of the theme

Two brawls, a silence, a verdict

Conflict is central five times: in the Prologue, which announces it; in the two brawls, 1.1 and 3.1; at the feast (1.5), where Capulet stops a third fight before it starts; and in 5.3, where the Prince gives his verdict. Between the brawls it runs lower through the lovers' scenes and vanishes at the wedding (2.6). From 4.1 to 5.2 it is almost silent: no brawl, no Prince, no feud word spoken, and in Act 4 no Montague at all. It rises in 4.3, where Juliet imagines Tybalt's ghost, and faintly in 5.2, where a house sealed for plague stops the Friar's letter. That silence is evidence that the feud's threat has moved indoors, into a household. Both confirmed AQA extracts on male violence and on the conflict's effects came from 1.1, so in those papers the killings of 3.1 and the whole ending had to come from memory.

Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4Act 5AbsentTouched onPresentCentralQuotesPast paper123456P12345C1234561234512345123Use the arrow keys to move between scenes. Enter opens the scene in the Summary.
  • Conflict
  • Family and authority
  • Quotes on the theme (a bigger dot, more quotes)
  • Set as an AQA extract
  • 1Turning point, listed below

Use this in the exam: find your extract's scene, then follow the theme forward to a turning point after it. Tracing how the theme rises, falls or changes from the extract to the whole play is what the top level rewards.

Turning points

  1. 1

    An old grudge, new violence Prologue The ending, told first

    ‘From ancient grudge break to new mutiny’

    Chorus to the audience, Prologue, line 3

  2. 2

    The Prince blames the fathers 1.1 The brawl and the lovesick son

    ‘Three civil brawls bred of an airy word / By thee, old Capulet, and Montague, / Have thrice disturbed the quiet of our streets’

    Prince to Capulet and Montague, Act 1, Scene 1, line 91

  3. 3

    Tybalt hears a Montague's voice 1.5 Love at the enemy's feast

    ‘This, by his voice, should be a Montague. / Fetch me my rapier, boy.’

    Tybalt to himself, then his page, Act 1, Scene 5, line 61

  4. 4

    A curse on both houses 3.1 A word and a blow

    ‘A plague o' both your houses!’

    Mercutio to Romeo and Benvolio, Act 3, Scene 1, line 103

  5. 5

    The feud survives as a ghost 4.3 Alone with the vial

    ‘O look, methinks I see my cousin's ghost / Seeking out Romeo that did spit his body / Upon a rapier's point! Stay, Tybalt, stay!’

    Juliet to Tybalt's ghost, Act 4, Scene 3, line 56

  6. 6

    Everyone pays, the Prince too 5.3 The tomb and the glooming peace

    ‘And I, for winking at your discords too, / Have lost a brace of kinsmen. All are punished.’

    Prince to Capulet and Montague, Act 5, Scene 3, line 304

Through the play

  1. 1

    The quarrel before the lovers

    Establishes

    In the Summary: Prologue

    The play opens on the feud, not the love. Before any character speaks, the Chorus names two equal houses and an old grudge breaking out again, and gives it no cause: the play never will. The first damage it names is public, ‘civil blood makes civil hands unclean’, so the quarrel is a wound in the whole city. Then the sonnet says how it will end and who will pay: nothing could remove the parents' rage ‘but their children's end’. Even the love is announced through the feud's cost: the Chorus calls it ‘death-marked’, the phrase AQA's November 2020 mark scheme quotes for the conflict keeping the lovers apart. AQA has never printed the Prologue, but the November 2020 report praised answers that widened from the extract to it: make it the frame of any conflict essay.

    • Two households,1 both alike2 in dignity3

      Chorus to the audience

      Prologue, line 1

      4Sonnet5Rhyme6Grade 9 insight
      ConflictFamily and authority

      The feud arrives as 'households' before any person in them has a name: people here are first their families, which is what the feud needs and what the lovers will try to undo.

      Key word: ‘households’

      A household is a family with its servants and dependants, so the word takes in everyone who wears the house's colours: that is why the first fight is between servants.

      In the exam

      Open an effects essay here: the play starts with institutions and spends the rest of its length counting what they cost individuals.

    • From ancient1 grudge2 break to new mutiny3

      Chorus to the audience

      Prologue, line 3

      4Antithesis
      ConflictFamily and authority

      The feud has an age and an outbreak but no beginning, so nobody can be made to answer for its cause, only for today's fight.

      In the exam

      If a question invites causes, say the play withholds one, and move the argument from why the feud began to who keeps it going.

    • And the continuance1 of their parents' rage,2 / Which, but their children's end,3 naught could remove

      Chorus to the audience

      Prologue, line 10

      ConflictFamily and authorityDeath and time

      No other remedy is offered: no law, no marriage, no change of heart. The Prologue tells us that every attempt at peace will fail, the Prince's sentence and the Friar's alliance among them, so the audience watches each one knowing the end; whether they had to fail is the play's question.

      Key word: ‘end’

      'End' means death, and it is also the word for a story's close: the children's deaths, the feud's removal and the play's last scene are one event, so the Prologue has already placed the peace in the play's final minutes.

      In the exam

      Measure each attempt at peace against this line, and use it to answer a 'how far is the ending hopeful' question from the first minute.

  2. 2

    A brawl, a law and an easy promise

    Spreads

    In the Summary: Act 1, Scene 1, 1.1Act 1, Scene 2, 1.2Act 1, Scene 3, 1.3Act 1, Scene 4, 1.4

    Shakespeare stages the feud before the lovers, and in one scene it spreads up Verona's ranks: servants who check whether ‘the law’ is on their side before they dare, Benvolio drawing to part them, Tybalt, who hates the very word 'peace', citizens who curse ‘Down with the Capulets! Down with the Montagues!’, and two old men spoiling to fight, Capulet calling for his sword and Montague already flourishing his, while their wives mock them and hold them back. Nobody dies and much of it is comic, yet the Prince names the fathers as the cause and prices the next brawl at a life. Later that day Capulet thinks peace easy for ‘men so old as we’, and a servant who cannot read invites Romeo, of all people, to the feast. The feud says nothing in the women's scene (1.3). AQA has printed 1.1 twice, the servants (June 2017) and the Prince's speech (November 2020): from either, leave by the Prince's sentence, which 3.1 breaks and 5.3 carries out. Specimen 1 (1.2.6 to 19) opens three lines after Capulet's easy promise: set it against that morning's sword, then leave for 3.5, where his temper turns on his daughter.

    • What, drawn and talk of peace?1 I hate the word2 / As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.3

      Tybalt to Benvolio

      Act 1, Scene 1, line 71

      4Tybalt and the peacemakers5Grade 9 insight
      ConflictGender and honour

      In the whole brawl only Tybalt says that he hates: the servants need the law's permission and Capulet needs his sword fetched. Everyone shares the feud's habit; its hatred, so far, belongs to one young man.

      In the exam

      On a Tybalt question, use it as the fixed point: his hatred never changes, so his scenes measure how far everyone else moves.

    • What noise is this? Give me my long sword,1,2 ho!

      Capulet to his household

      Act 1, Scene 1, line 76

      3From sword to hand
      ConflictFamily and authority

      In the morning Capulet calls for a sword at a noise; that night he forbids Tybalt to fight a Montague at his feast. The feud is the fathers' temper, not their policy, so it is easy to restart and hard to end.

      In the exam

      Set it beside 'Am I the master here or you?' (1.5) and 'O brother Montague' (5.3) to argue that the fathers decide when the feud matters.

    • Rebellious subjects,1 enemies to peace, / Profaners2 of this neighbor-stainèd steel3

      Prince to the brawlers

      Act 1, Scene 1, line 83

      4Profane
      ConflictFamily and authority

      The Prince charges both sides with one crime without asking who began it (he asks only in 3.1, over a body): in Verona's law the feud has no right side, only two sets of guilty hands.

      In the exam

      On an effects question (November 2020), begin with the conflict's effect on the state, then follow the Prince to 5.3, where he counts himself among the guilty.

    • Three civil brawls1 bred of an airy2 word / By thee, old Capulet, and Montague,3 / Have thrice4 disturbed the quiet of our streets

      Prince to Capulet and Montague

      Act 1, Scene 1, line 91

      ConflictFamily and authority

      The Prince's charge against the feud names three brawls that 'disturbed the quiet', and no death: so far its effects are noise, fear and old men in arms. That is what makes 3.1 the change, when the next brawl kills.

      Key word: ‘bred’

      To breed is to beget and raise: the brawls are the airy word's children, so the feud is a family that reproduces itself, in a play where the houses' real children pay for it.

      In the exam

      On a Prince question, show his authority working by naming the fathers to their faces, then test it against his own 'winking' in 5.3.

    • If ever1 you disturb our streets again, / Your lives2 shall pay the forfeit3 of the peace.

      Prince to Capulet and Montague

      Act 1, Scene 1, line 98

      4Three judgements5Grade 9 insight
      ConflictDeath and timeFamily and authority

      For now the law is the one force stronger than the feud, and the crowd goes home. But it can only punish the next brawl, not end the feud, so Romeo can cite it in 3.1 and still not stop the fight.

      Key word: ‘peace’

      Peace here is a bond the citizens hold and can forfeit, like a deposit: a legal state, not a feeling. The Prince's last 'peace' (5.3) is a state of affairs again, and a 'glooming' one.

      In the exam

      Argue that the state deters but cannot cure: follow the sentence to Romeo's 'The Prince expressly hath / Forbid this bandying' (3.1), spoken while the swords are out.

  3. 3

    Underground, and inside the love

    Grows

    In the Summary: Act 1, Scene 5, 1.5Act 2, ChorusAct 2, Scene 1, 2.1Act 2, Scene 2, 2.2Act 2, Scene 3, 2.3Act 2, Scene 4, 2.4Act 2, Scene 5, 2.5Act 2, Scene 6, 2.6

    At the feast the feud recognises Romeo before Juliet does. Tybalt knows his voice, calls for his rapier and is overruled by his uncle; he leaves vowing the intrusion will ‘convert to bitt'rest gall’, and the lovers' sonnet begins in the next line. From here the feud goes quiet on stage but grows in two places. It enters the love: Juliet can name her love only through ‘my only hate’, argues in the orchard that the feud is only a name, and still warns Romeo that ‘they will murder thee’. And it plots offstage: by Monday noon Tybalt has ‘sent a letter’, a challenge. The Friar marries the lovers hoping to end the feud, and the wedding happens offstage. AQA's four extracts from these scenes carry the feud faintly. The sonnet (June 2019) has none: leave by what follows it, the Nurse's news and 'my only hate'. Specimen 3 ends on Romeo's 'proof against their enmity'. June 2022 (2.2.2 to 26) and June 2024 (2.5.1 to 18) never name it, but the June 2024 mark scheme credits the effects of conflict on Juliet: bring the feud in through the name she must refuse, ‘my enemy’. From any of them, leave for 3.1.

    • This, by his voice,1 should be a Montague. / Fetch me my rapier,2,3 boy.

      Tybalt to himself, then his page

      Act 1, Scene 5, line 61

      ConflictGender and honour

      A mask hides Romeo's face but not his family: the feud needs only a voice to find an enemy, and it recognises the lover before the girl he is praising knows his name.

      In the exam

      On a Tybalt question, show his hostility is instant and inherited: he identifies a Montague by voice alone, then reads mockery into his mere presence ('To fleer and scorn at our solemnity').

    • My only love sprung1 from my only hate!2

      Juliet to herself

      Act 1, Scene 5, line 152

      3Paradox made fact4Grade 9 insight
      LoveConflict

      Juliet speaks of the hatred as hers, though nothing in the play shows her with a quarrel of her own: the feud is inherited like a name, and she finds she owns it in the same breath as the love.

      In the exam

      On a feelings or relationship question, show the feud inside the love from its first hour, before anyone has fought over it.

    • 'Tis but thy name1 that is my enemy. / Thou art thyself,2 though not a Montague.

      Juliet to Romeo, whom she believes absent

      Act 2, Scene 2, line 41

      ConflictLoveFamily and authority

      Juliet treats the feud as a matter of words, as Tybalt did when he hated the word 'peace': on both sides it lives in language. Her cure is to strip the name off, and she says it believing herself alone, so the play's sharpest argument against the feud is heard only by the Montague it is about, hidden below.

      In the exam

      On a feelings or relationship question, use it to show Juliet arguing with the feud rather than fighting or obeying it: others try to stop the brawls, and she questions what makes an enemy.

    • In one respect1 I'll thy assistant be, / For this alliance2 may so happy prove / To turn your households' rancor to pure love.3

      Friar Lawrence to Romeo

      Act 2, Scene 3, line 97

      4A marriage to end a war
      ConflictFamily and authorityLove

      The Friar's plan never goes near the Prince: the one adult who wants peace works privately, through a marriage, while the state works publicly, through threats, and the Prince hears of the plan only at the inquest in 5.3. Verona's two cures for the feud never meet until it is too late.

      In the exam

      On a Prince or how-far question, use it to argue that peace in Verona fails because its makers work apart: the Friar in secret, the Prince in public, the fathers not at all.

  4. 4

    The brawl turns fatal

    Tips

    In the Summary: Act 3, Scene 1, 3.1

    Within the hour of the wedding the feud is back in the street, in the heat Benvolio blames. The order of events matters, and answers often blur it. Mercutio has already goaded Tybalt when Tybalt challenges Romeo, who refuses and calls him ‘good Capulet’; Mercutio, who cannot bear the refusal, draws; Romeo steps between them, and Tybalt wounds Mercutio ‘under your arm’; Mercutio curses both houses and is helped off to die offstage; Romeo chooses revenge and kills Tybalt; the Prince, whose own kinsman is dead, exiles him. In under eighty lines, from the challenge to Tybalt's fall, the feud kills a man of neither house and a Capulet, and by the scene's end the Montagues' only son is an exile. The scene is the exact middle of the play, and after it the play no longer has a comedy's shape. AQA has not printed 3.1 in any confirmed paper, but every conflict answer needs it: from an Act 1 extract, it is where the brawl first kills.

    • And but one word with one of us? Couple it with something. Make it a word and a blow.1

      Mercutio to Tybalt

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 40

      2An airy word
      ConflictGender and honour

      The first call for violence in 3.1 comes from a man of neither house: the code recruits outsiders, and the one who asks for the blow is the one it kills.

      In the exam

      On a blame question, set it beside 'A plague o' both your houses!': the man who asked for the blow curses others for it.

    • Romeo, the love I bear thee1 can afford / No better term than this: thou art a villain.2

      Tybalt to Romeo

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 61

      3A debt from the feast4A refused exchange
      ConflictGender and honourFamily and authority

      Courteous in form and deadly in content: Tybalt follows the rules of honour to the letter, so the killing that follows cannot be put down to hot blood alone.

      In the exam

      On a Tybalt question, argue he is the code's most correct follower, and that his grievance is the feast, not this afternoon.

    • And so, good Capulet,1 which name I tender2 / As dearly as mine own,3 be satisfied.

      Romeo to Tybalt

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 72

      4Grade 9 insight
      LoveConflictFamily and authority

      Romeo still calls Tybalt by his house, as the feud taught everyone to, but he will 'tender' that name 'As dearly as mine own': the feud's habit of reducing a man to his family is kept and its feeling reversed. His peace does not leave the feud's language; it loves inside it.

      In the exam

      Show peace possible in words and impossible in public: weigh it against Mercutio's 'vile submission' two lines later.

    • A plague1 o' both your houses!2

      Mercutio to Romeo and Benvolio

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 103

      3A curse that comes true4Shifting the blame?
      ConflictFateDeath and time

      The feud's first death falls on a man of neither house, and his curse is the citizens' cry from 1.1 in a dying man's mouth: the conflict has escaped the families and is killing outsiders.

      Key word: ‘houses’

      A 'house' is a family line, the Prologue's 'households'. Mercutio served neither and dies of both, so the curse treats the two as one disease, as the citizens did in 1.1 and the Prince will in 5.3.

      In the exam

      On an effects question, widen the feud's cost beyond the two families, then follow the curse to 'All are punished' (5.3).

    • Thy beauty hath made me effeminate1 / And in my temper2 softened valor's steel.3

      Romeo to Juliet (absent)

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 119

      4The code, or Romeo's mistake?5Grade 9 insight
      Gender and honourLoveConflict

      Romeo cannot defend his peace in the code's terms, because its real reason is a secret marriage, so he accepts the code's name for it: the feud wins because the other side of the argument cannot be spoken.

      In the exam

      On a Romeo and Tybalt question, use it to explain why Romeo loses the argument before the fight: the one reason for his peace that would satisfy the code, his marriage, is the one he cannot give.

    • Away to heaven, respective lenity,1 / And fire-eyed2 fury3 be my conduct5 now.4

      Romeo to himself (then Tybalt)

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 128

      6A choice framed by fate7Loyalty, or fury?
      ConflictYouth and impulsivenessFate

      Revenge passes the debt along: Tybalt fought over a slight, Mercutio for Romeo's honour, Romeo now for Mercutio. Each killing makes the next creditor, which is how a feud with no cause keeps going.

      In the exam

      Use it to show the feud's mechanism, revenge as repayment, and argue that Romeo re-enters a feud he had left an hour before.

    • O, I am Fortune's fool!1,2

      Romeo to Benvolio (and himself)

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 142

      3Shared line4Grade 9 insight
      FateYouth and impulsivenessConflict

      Within seventy lines of calling Tybalt 'good Capulet', Romeo has killed him, and he names Fortune as the culprit, not the feud and not himself: the feud has taken back its would-be deserter and left its own part unnamed, as the Prologue left its cause unnamed.

      In the exam

      On an effects question, use it as the conflict's effect on Romeo himself: the would-be peacemaker made a killer and, minutes later, an exile.

    • And for that offense1 / Immediately2 we do exile3 him hence.4

      Prince to Montague and all present

      Act 3, Scene 1, line 196

      ConflictFateLove

      The second judgement softens the first: the death promised in 1.1 becomes exile, because Tybalt killed first. The feud has bent the law to fit a fight with two killers, and the judge is now one of its mourners.

      In the exam

      Track the Prince's three judgements, and argue that this merciful one sets the rest of the tragedy moving: the Friar's plan, the potion, the letter.

  5. 5

    Into the house, and into Juliet

    Fractures

    In the Summary: Act 3, Scene 2, 3.2Act 3, Scene 3, 3.3Act 3, Scene 4, 3.4Act 3, Scene 5, 3.5

    After 3.1 the feud is never fought in Verona's streets again: it moves into rooms, words and minds. Juliet hears the news and the two houses fight inside her sentences until she chooses her husband, ‘That villain cousin would have killed my husband’. In the Friar's cell Romeo hears his own name as a murderer's and turns a dagger on himself to cut it out. In the Capulet house the feud's revenge passes to a mother: Lady Capulet, refused Romeo's death by the Prince, plans to send poison to Mantua, and Juliet answers her in double meanings. Then the household's war on its daughter takes the feud's place, and Capulet's ‘My fingers itch’ brings the street's violence home. Five AQA extracts come from these scenes (3.2 in Specimen 2, November 2021 and June 2023; 3.5 in June 2018 and June 2025): read any of them as the conflict's effects reaching people who never fought in it.

    • Beautiful tyrant,1 fiend angelical!2

      Juliet to the absent Romeo

      Act 3, Scene 2, line 81

      3Echo4Two readings5Grade 9 insight
      LoveGender and honourConflict

      The feud reaches Juliet: each oxymoron sets the husband she loves against the cousin her house has lost, so the street fight of 3.1 is replayed inside one sentence.

      In the exam

      On an effects or difficulties question, show the conflict moving from the street into Juliet's mind; AQA's June 2024 mark scheme lists its effects on her.

    • In what vile part of this anatomy1 / Doth my name lodge? Tell me, that I may sack2 / The hateful mansion.3

      Romeo to Friar Lawrence

      Act 3, Scene 3, line 115

      4The first blade
      LoveConflictDeath and time

      Romeo now reasons as Tybalt did, that a name is a reason to kill, but turns the reasoning on himself: the feud's logic needs only one Montague to work.

      In the exam

      Argue that after 3.1 the conflict's effects are inward as well as physical, and pair it with Juliet's orchard argument that the name is the only enemy (2.2).

    • We will have vengeance for it,1 fear thou not. / Then weep no more. I'll send to one in Mantua,2 / Where that same banished runagate doth live, / Shall give him such an unaccustomed dram3 / That he shall soon keep Tybalt company.4

      Lady Capulet to Juliet

      Act 3, Scene 5, line 92

      ConflictFamily and authorityDeath and time

      Lady Capulet offers her daughter revenge as comfort, not knowing she is plotting against her son-in-law: with the young men dead or gone, the feud's revenge passes to the parents and into the house.

      Key word: ‘fear thou not’

      The comfort promises the one thing Juliet fears most: dramatic irony turns a mother's reassurance into the feud's threat, minutes after Romeo has gone.

      In the exam

      On a family or effects question, show the feud continuing indoors, where each word of comfort to Juliet threatens her husband.

  6. 6

    No street, no Prince, no feud word

    Hollows

    In the Summary: Act 4, Scene 1, 4.1Act 4, Scene 2, 4.2Act 4, Scene 3, 4.3Act 4, Scene 4, 4.4Act 4, Scene 5, 4.5Act 5, Scene 1, 5.1Act 5, Scene 2, 5.2

    Act 4 has no brawl, no Prince, no Montague and no Romeo, and the feud's own words ('grudge', 'quarrel', 'foe', 'enemy' and the rest) are not spoken from 4.1 to 5.2. The silence is evidence. The feud's threat has been taken over by a household: a father's decree and a wedding moved forward press on Juliet as hard as any sword. The feud surfaces once, at night, in Juliet's imagination: alone with the vial, she pictures ‘bloody Tybalt, yet but green in earth’ in the vault where she must lie, then seems to see his ghost hunting Romeo. In 5.1 Romeo buys poison in Mantua, and in 5.2 a house sealed for plague stops the Friar's letter, an irony an answer can set beside Mercutio's curse on 'both your houses'. No AQA extract has come from these scenes: use the silence to argue that the conflict's effects outlast its fighting.

    • O look, methinks I see1 my cousin's ghost / Seeking out Romeo that did spit2 his body / Upon a rapier's point! Stay, Tybalt, stay!3

      Juliet to Tybalt's ghost

      Act 4, Scene 3, line 56

      4Played out
      ConflictDeath and timeLove

      The only feud in Act 4 is in Juliet's mind, and even there it is the 3.1 killing replayed: the conflict has become a fear she must carry alone into her family's vault.

      Key word: ‘Seeking’

      The ghost is still hunting: in her vision the feud goes on after death, looking for its next victim, and at the tomb Paris will ask whether vengeance can be pursued 'further than death'.

      In the exam

      Make it your Act 4 reference in any conflict essay: the feud's effect on Juliet is terror of her own family's dead.

  7. 7

    The last fight and the price

    Resolves

    In the Summary: Act 5, Scene 3, 5.3

    The feud's last fight happens at the tomb door, and it is not between the houses. Paris, the Prince's kinsman, tries to arrest a ‘vile Montague’ under the Prince's law; Romeo begs him three times to go, then draws on him with Tybalt's word, 'boy', and kills him. Inside, he asks the dead Tybalt's pardon. Then the feud is settled in public. The Prince turns on the fathers and counts himself among the punished; Capulet offers Montague his hand and calls it his daughter's ‘jointure’; Montague answers with a statue in gold, and Capulet with another. The peace is real, and it is priced: in gold, perhaps the old habit of outdoing the other house in a new form, and in five young lives and a mother's. AQA has never printed 5.3, and its November 2020 mark scheme says the conflict is 'only resolved through death': from any extract, end here, and weigh the handshake against the 'glooming' dawn.

    • Wilt thou provoke me?1 Then have at thee, boy!2

      Romeo to Paris

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 70

      3The last fight
      ConflictGender and honourYouth and impulsiveness

      The last fight is between a Montague and the Prince's kinsman, at the Capulets' tomb, over the Prince's law: by now the feud's labels and challenges work without either house in the fight.

      In the exam

      Show the conflict's habit outliving its fighters: Paris, betrothed into the Capulet house, sees only a 'vile Montague' who 'murdered my love's cousin', and the feud's grievance kills a man of neither house.

    • Where be these enemies?1 Capulet, Montague, / See what a scourge2 is laid upon your hate, / That heaven4 finds means to kill your joys with love3

      Prince to Capulet and Montague

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 301

      ConflictFateFamily and authority

      One 'hate' for two houses: the Prince speaks of the feud as a single thing the fathers own together, as Mercutio's curse did, so the verdict joins them in guilt a moment before Capulet joins them in kinship.

      In the exam

      On a blame question, use it as the play's official verdict, then weigh it against the choices of 3.1 that it leaves out.

    • And I,1 for winking2 at your discords too, / Have lost a brace of kinsmen. All are punished.3

      Prince to Capulet and Montague

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 304

      4Three judgements
      ConflictFamily and authority

      The forfeit of 1.1 has been paid, but not by the men it named: the price set on the fathers' lives was collected from their children and the Prince's kin, and both fathers survive.

      In the exam

      On a Prince question, use 'And I' to argue that the last judgement falls on authority itself.

    • O brother1,2 Montague, give me thy hand.3 / This is my daughter's jointure,4 for no more / Can I demand.5

      Capulet to Montague

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 306

      Family and authorityConflict

      These are Capulet's first words to Montague in the play; the only other time the fathers address each other is Montague's 'Thou villain Capulet!' (1.1). Between the two lines the feud has cost each of them his only child.

      In the exam

      On a 'how far is the ending hopeful' question, weigh the handshake against what the fathers do next, a bid and a match in gold, and decide whether the feud has ended or only changed its currency.

    • But I can give thee more,1 / For I will ray her statue3 in pure gold,2 / That whiles Verona by that name is known, / There shall no figure at such rate4 be set / As that of true and faithful Juliet.5

      Montague to Capulet

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 309

      Family and authorityConflictLove

      The feud ends as its brawls began, in public display: monuments that will stand 'whiles Verona by that name is known', so the city will look at the houses' quarrel for ever, in gold.

      In the exam

      On a 'how far is the ending hopeful' question, use the bidding on both sides: generosity between enemies, or the old competition in a new currency.

    • As rich1 shall Romeo's by his lady's lie,2 / Poor sacrifices of our enmity.3,4

      Capulet to Montague

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 314

      ConflictFamily and authorityDeath and time

      Capulet fulfils the Prologue's 'but their children's end' in a father's mouth, and calls the deaths sacrifices, as if they had bought something, where the Prince called them a scourge.

      In the exam

      Weigh whether the deaths are a price paid for peace or a punishment for hate: father and Prince describe the ending in different terms.

    • A glooming peace1 this morning with it brings.

      Prince to all on stage

      Act 5, Scene 3, line 316

      2A closing sestet3Two words that argue4Grade 9 insight
      ConflictDeath and timeFamily and authority

      This is the first time in the play that 'peace' names the feud's end, rather than a law to keep, a word to hate, a greeting or a call for quiet, and it arrives already darkened.

      Key word: ‘brings’

      The subject of 'brings' is the morning, not the fathers or the Prince: the peace is delivered to Verona rather than made by it, the strongest evidence for reading the ending as exhaustion rather than change.

      In the exam

      End any conflict essay here: weigh 'peace' against 'glooming', and judge whether Verona has changed or only run out of heirs to fight with.

Who carries it

  • Romeo

    Speaks more of the conflict than anyone: the feud's would-be deserter, taken back.

    He misses the first brawl and turns it into love poetry, ‘much to do with hate, but more with love’. Secretly married, he offers Tybalt peace in 3.1 and within minutes has killed him; in 3.3 he turns the feud on his own name; in 5.3 he kills Paris and asks the dead Tybalt's pardon. He speaks more of the theme's lines than any other single character, nearly half of them in Act 3, which is why the voices chart names him first.

  • Tybalt

    The feud's one true believer among the young: he hates by rule and dies by it.

    He answers a peacemaker with ‘I hate the word’, knows Romeo ‘by his voice’ at the feast, and is humiliated by his uncle. In 3.1 he keeps the code exactly, wounds Mercutio under Romeo's arm, runs, comes back for reasons the play never gives, and dies. Dead, he still works on the living: Juliet fears his ghost, and Romeo begs his pardon in the vault.

  • Mercutio

    Of neither house: mocks the feud's fashions, picks the fatal fight and dies cursing both.

    He laughs at Tybalt as the ‘prince of cats’, then in 3.1 turns a polite request into ‘a word and a blow’ and draws when Romeo will not. Wounded, he curses both houses four times. Most of his conflict lines fall in Act 3: his part in the feud is one afternoon long, and it decides the play.

  • Prince Escalus

    The state's voice: three entrances, three judgements and, at last, a confession.

    He prices the next brawl at a life in 1.1, ‘You men, you beasts’; in 3.1, his kinsman dead, he chooses exile and doubts his own mercy; in 5.3 he judges everyone, himself included, ‘for winking at your discords too’. The voices chart gives him about the same weight in each of his three scenes: never seen between them, always arriving after the blood.

  • Capulet

    Calls for his sword, forbids a fight, turns the feud's temper on his daughter and offers the first hand.

    In the morning he wants his ‘long sword’; at night he stops Tybalt in his own house. Silent at the 3.1 inquest, he turns his temper indoors on Juliet, ‘My fingers itch’. In 5.3 he speaks to Montague for the first time in the play and calls the hatred his own: ‘our enmity’.

  • Montague and Lady Montague

    The other house, mostly kept offstage.

    Montague arrives in 1.1 shouting ‘Thou villain Capulet!’ while his wife holds him back. In 3.1 he speaks once, for his son; he never speaks to Romeo alive. Lady Montague's only two speeches are in 1.1, one for peace and one for Romeo, and in 5.3 her husband reports that grief at the exile has killed her. He answers Capulet's hand with a statue in gold.

  • Lady Capulet

    Mocks her husband's sword, then becomes the feud's loudest voice for revenge.

    In 1.1 she offers him ‘A crutch, a crutch!’. Over Tybalt's body she demands ‘Romeo must not live’ and calls Benvolio a liar; refused by the Prince, she plans a poisoning in Mantua as comfort for her daughter. Her arc runs opposite to her husband's: from mocking the feud to keeping it alive.

  • Benvolio

    The peacemaker of both brawls and the witness of both; gone after 3.1.

    He draws only to part the servants, ‘Put up your swords’, and in 3.1 asks the quarrellers to ‘reason coldly’. Both times he is ignored and then tells the story, the second time to the Prince, as a Montague, so Lady Capulet calls him partial; after that he is never seen again.

  • Sampson and Gregory

    Capulet's servants: they start the play's first brawl and work the law to their advantage.

    They plan to ‘let them begin’ and check whether ‘the law’ is on their side before they dare, then Sampson dares the Montague men to ‘Draw if you be men’. They never speak after 1.1: the feud's lowest ranks open it, and its fathers close it.

  • Juliet

    Never fights in the feud, and feels its effects most.

    She finds the feud inside her first love, ‘my only hate’, and argues it away as a name. In 3.2 the killing splits her loyalties until she chooses her husband; in 3.5 she meets her mother's talk of revenge with double meanings. In Act 4 she is the feud's only voice, imagining ‘bloody Tybalt’ in the vault where she must lie.

  • Friar Lawrence

    The only adult with a plan to end the feud, and the plan is a secret.

    He marries the lovers ‘In one respect’, hoping to end the households' rancour, and after 3.1 plans to ‘reconcile your friends’ once the marriage is public. Neither happens in time; at the inquest his story turns the fathers' blame into a handshake.

  • Paris

    The Prince's kinsman, killed in the feud's last fight though he belongs to neither house.

    In 1.2 he regrets that the houses ‘lived at odds so long’; at the tomb he takes up the Capulets' grievance against the Montague ‘That murdered my love's cousin’ and tries to arrest him under the Prince's law. With Mercutio, he is the 'brace of kinsmen' the Prince loses.

  • Chorus

    Frames the feud before anyone fights it: names the grudge and its only cure.

    The Prologue gives the feud an age and no cause, ‘From ancient grudge break to new mutiny’, and names its price, ‘but their children's end’. Before Act 2 the Chorus makes the feud the lovers' obstacle, ‘Being held a foe’, and is never heard again: the feud's ending is left to the Prince.

Who voices it, act by act

Other voices leads it in Acts 1 to 3, Juliet in Act 4 and other voices in Act 5.

Act 159Act 231Act 383Act 44Act 532Use the up and down arrow keys to move between the acts.
  • Romeo
  • Prince
  • Juliet
  • Others

Use this in the exam: a question on a character is often a theme question in disguise. Say whose theme it is at each stage, and why it changes hands.

How Shakespeare presents it

AO2 A method is anything the writer does on purpose, in the words and beyond them. Name it, then say what it lets them show.

In the words

  • The Prince's language of authority

    Language

    The Prince's language changes with each judgement. In 1.1, AQA's November 2020 extract, he gives charges before names, ‘Rebellious subjects’ and ‘Profaners of this neighbor-stainèd steel’, makes the brawlers beasts who quench rage with their own blood, ‘purple fountains issuing from your veins’, and shows the city's old men called to arms, ‘Cankered with peace, to part your cankered hate’: images of sin, animals and disease, so the feud has a cost and no right side. In 3.1 he talks like a creditor, ‘Who now the price of his dear blood doth owe?’ In 5.3 he ends on three plain words, ‘All are punished’. The ruler who began with accusations and imagery ends by confessing: the plainer his language, the less he can claim to stand outside the feud.

  • 'Villain', handed on

    Motif

    The feud's word for an enemy passes from hand to hand like a challenge. Its first speaker is a father, Montague, in 1.1. Tybalt uses it of Romeo at the feast and to his face, ‘thou art a villain’; Romeo refuses it, then throws it back, ‘take the “villain” back again’, and kills him. It reaches Juliet, who calls Romeo ‘an honorable villain’, moves the word to her cousin within thirty lines, and refuses it to her mother, ‘Villain and he be many miles asunder’. Paris speaks it last, at the tomb door. One word shows the feud's language spreading, and being resisted.

Beyond the words

  • Three public scenes, three judgements

    Structure

    The feud's story is told in three public scenes, at the start, the centre and the end (1.1, 3.1, 5.3), each brought on by blood and each settled by the Prince's judgement. His judgements reach further each time: death for the next brawl, ‘Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace’; exile for Romeo, ‘Immediately we do exile him hence’; then judgement on everyone, himself included. Each time he arrives later: to part a brawl, to a body in the street, to three bodies in a tomb. The frame places any extract in the feud's public story and shows the law always one step behind the fighting.

  • A wedding, then a killing

    Structure

    Shakespeare puts the wedding offstage at the end of 2.6 and the street fight straight after it: the feud returns within the hour of the marriage meant to end it. 3.1 is also the exact middle of the play by the Folger's line numbers. Until Mercutio dies the feud has been loud but has killed no one: servants checking the law, old men held back by their wives, a fight stopped at a feast. After it every scene is the feud's consequence, which is why the second half can show the conflict's effects without another brawl until the tomb.

  • Onstage and offstage

    Staging

    Shakespeare chooses which harms we see. The brawl, Tybalt's killing and the fight with Paris are shown; Mercutio dies offstage after he is helped away, and Lady Montague's death is only reported, ‘my wife is dead tonight’. The two fathers never fight: in 1.1 their wives mock them and hold them back; in 3.1 they stand over Tybalt's body, where Montague speaks once, to the Prince, and Capulet not at all; and they speak to each other again only over their children's bodies. Every death we watch is a young person's, and the feud's one death in the parents' generation happens out of sight: the stage shows who fights, and the reports show how far the cost spreads.

  • Foils: Benvolio and Tybalt

    Foil

    The first two gentlemen in the brawl set out the choice every young man in Verona faces. Benvolio draws to part the fight, ‘I do but keep the peace’; Tybalt sees a drawn sword and the word 'peace' together and hears a lie. In 3.1 Benvolio again asks for a private place or cool reason and is ignored, while Tybalt again keeps the code exactly. One foil shows the feud could be refused, so every fight is a choice; the other shows what refusing looks like to those who live by it.

  • Couplets that sound like law

    Form

    The feud's public judgements keep clicking shut in rhyme. At the 3.1 inquest Benvolio tells what happened in blank verse until his closing couplet; then Lady Capulet, Montague and the Prince answer in couplets, from ‘Romeo slew Tybalt; Romeo must not live’ to the scene's last line, ‘Mercy but murders, pardoning those that kill’. The rival claims, not the witness's account, get the sound of law: each rhyme makes its claim sound settled, yet the claims contradict one another. The feud is also framed by sonnet form at both ends: the Prologue's full sonnet announces it, and the Prince's closing sestet (ABABCC), the end of a sonnet, buries it.

  • Dramatic irony: the cure told first

    Irony

    Because the Prologue has named the only cure, the audience watches every attempt at peace knowing it will fail. In 3.1 only Romeo, of everyone on stage, knows he married Tybalt's cousin an hour ago, so his ‘I see thou knowest me not’ is true in a way Tybalt cannot hear. Capulet shields Romeo at the feast without knowing he has fallen for his daughter, and in 3.5 Lady Capulet promises to have her son-in-law poisoned. The feud lives on what the houses do not know about each other, which may be why it ends only after the Friar tells the whole story.

How often its words are spoken

How often each family of words is spoken, scene by scene, all on one scale. The counts come from the spoken lines, so they show where the language clusters, not how much a scene matters.

Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4Act 5Feud, quarrel and foe59 words18 in 3.1Swords and daggers29 words10 in 1.1P12345C1234561234512345123Use the arrow keys to move between scenes, and up and down between the word families.
  • Feud, quarrel and foe. Feud words ('grudge', 'quarrel', 'fray', 'foe', 'enemy' and the rest) are spoken 59 times, most in 3.1 (18) and 1.1 (14), and after the killings they almost stop: from 3.2 to 5.2 the family occurs once, Juliet's 'discords' for the lark's song. Most of 3.1's come before the swords are out or after they are put up, so the scene talks about quarrelling more than it names it during the fight. The counts measure talk: Act 4's silence shows where the feud stops being named, not where its effects stop.

    Counted: grudge, mutiny, brawl, brawls, brawling, quarrel, quarrels, quarreled, quarreling, fray, strife, discords, enmity, rancor, foe, foes, foe's, enemy, enemies, fight, fights, fighting, fought

  • Swords and daggers. Sword and dagger words are spoken 29 times, 10 of them in 1.1, the brawl in which nobody dies, against 6 in 3.1, where two men do: the first scene talks swords, the hinge uses them. In Act 4 the family's only words are the rapier in Juliet's vision of Tybalt's ghost (4.3) and a servant's comic dagger (4.5); the knife Juliet would turn on herself (4.1, 4.3) is a word the family does not count, and it points at herself, not an enemy. The last three come in 5.3: the 'masterless and gory swords' at the tomb door and the dagger in Juliet's body, which her father reads as a Montague blade gone astray.

    Counted: sword, swords, rapier, rapier's, dagger, weapon, weapons, blade, blades, steel

Use this in the exam: turn a spike into a precise claim about repetition. ‘Feud, quarrel and foe words come 18 times in Act 3, Scene 1 alone’ says far more than ‘there is a lot of feud, quarrel and foe imagery’.

How the words were counted: Spoken lines of the Folger text only (stage directions and settings left out), lower-cased, with accents and curly apostrophes folded and hyphens read as word breaks. A word counts for a family only when it is one of the family's listed forms, with no stemming, so "kinsman" is not "man". The counts show how often the words are spoken, not how much a theme matters.

Context that counts

AO3 Ideas that explain why the writer made a choice. Each one earns its place only when it is tied to a word or a moment.

  • Vengeance belongs to God and the ruler

    Paul's letter to the Romans, in the Geneva Bible of Shakespeare's day, told Christians not to avenge themselves, since vengeance belonged to God, and called the ruler who 'beareth not the sword for nought' God's minister to punish wrongdoers. A feud is private vengeance, the very thing that teaching forbade.

    Use it like this

    Tie it to the moment the two kinds of justice meet: Lady Capulet asks the Prince to make revenge the law, ‘For blood of ours, shed blood of Montague’, is refused, and next morning plans it privately, ‘We will have vengeance for it’. At the end the Prince reads the deaths as heaven's punishment of the hate, since heaven 'finds means', and still keeps judgement for the state: ‘Some shall be pardoned, and some punishèd’.

  • Exile as ruin

    In an Italian city, banishment could strip a man of home, goods and family, with death if he came back; one teacher, drawing on Christine Shaw's study of exile in Renaissance Italy, calls it 'often a death penalty in all but name'.

    Use it like this

    Tie it to the Prince's merciful ‘Immediately we do exile him hence’ and to its cost two acts later, ‘Grief of my son's exile hath stopped her breath’: the mercy that spares Romeo's life breaks his marriage and kills his mother, the conflict's effects reaching people who never fought.

  • Swords and the law of defence

    A royal proclamation of 1562 complained that long swords and rapiers were being sharpened for 'murder' rather than defence, which it called 'the very meaning of weapons in times of peace', and limited their length.

    Use it like this

    Tie it to the servants' calculation, ‘Is the law of our side if I say “Ay”?’: the feud's fighters know the rule and game it, so every fight is argued afterwards as who struck first, and the Prince's first words over Tybalt's body ask exactly that, ‘Where are the vile beginners of this fray?’

Keep context to a clause. A paragraph of history, or a sentence that starts ‘An audience at the time would…’, is bolt-on context, and examiners credit it at the lowest level.

The big debates

AO1 Top answers weigh readings rather than list them. Decide how far you agree with each, and let the ‘but’ sharpen your judgement.

  • One reading

    The feud only becomes deadly at 3.1. Until Mercutio dies it is, in Susan Snyder's words, 'more a matter of mechanical reflex than of deeply felt hatred': old men held back by their wives, servants checking the law, a fight stopped at a feast.

    Argued by Susan Snyder

    But…

    The comedy carries a death sentence from the first scene: Tybalt tells Benvolio to 'look upon thy death', the Prince prices the next brawl at a life, and Tybalt leaves the feast vowing revenge. What changes at 3.1 is only that the feud is paid in blood; its seeming harmlessness is the danger, because fathers who treat it as a habit leave it to the young.

  • One reading

    The feud itself, not any one person, destroys the lovers: the deaths come from 'the senseless hatred of their houses', and the Prince's verdict blames the fathers' 'hate', not their children.

    Argued by A. C. Bradley

    But…

    At each step someone chooses: Tybalt to challenge, Mercutio to draw, Romeo to take 'fire-eyed fury' as his guide, Capulet to move the wedding forward, the Prince to exile rather than execute. The feud explains why those choices are made, not that they had to be; even the Prince admits his own 'winking'.

  • One reading

    Tybalt is a man of honour by his own code: he challenges Romeo formally, and may have wounded Mercutio by accident, swerving round the man who stepped between them.

    Argued by Jerzy Limon

    But…

    The play never explains why Tybalt runs or why he comes back, so the accident cannot be proved from the text, and the one witness who tells the fight, Benvolio, a Montague whom Lady Capulet calls partial, makes Tybalt the attacker, 'deaf to peace'. What the text does show is a hatred complete from his first scene, 'I hate the word'.

  • One reading

    Verona itself is the tragedy's protagonist: a city whose fathers and ruler cannot protect their young, and whose competitive drive outlives the peace in two rival golden statues.

    Argued by Naomi Conn Liebler

    But…

    Nothing in the text shows the feud starting again: Capulet calls Montague 'brother', Montague answers with a gift, the Prince counts his own guilt, and 'Some shall be pardoned, and some punishèd' promises justice still to come. Reading the gold as rivalry is a judgement of tone, and the play ends before anyone can test it.

  • One reading

    The Prince fails for want of knowledge, not of judgement: in 3.1 he hears Benvolio's account against Lady Capulet's charge of partiality and chooses exile, a reasonable mercy on what he is told, and the feud ends only when the Friar tells him what nobody else knew.

    Argued by Barry B. Adams

    But…

    'Winking at your discords' is his own word for tolerance, not ignorance: he knew of the feud and let it run, so incomplete knowledge cannot excuse him. And the knowledge that ends it comes from a confession, not from anything his law found out.

Quotes that answer each other

Set one moment against another and the change becomes the argument. Examiners single out answers that pair references across the text.

  • ‘What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word…’‘What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word / As I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.’Tybalt, 1.1.71

    answered by

    ‘A glooming peace this morning with it brings.’Prince, 5.3.316

    What the pair proves

    The word Tybalt hated in 1.1 is the Prince's last gift, and it arrives only when Tybalt, Mercutio, Paris and both heirs are dead: Verona gets peace once nobody is left who would refuse it, and even then it is 'glooming'.

  • ‘Thou villain Capulet! Hold me not; let me go.’Montague, 1.1.81

    answered by

    ‘O brother Montague, give me thy hand…’‘O brother Montague, give me thy hand. / This is my daughter's jointure, for no more / Can I demand.’Capulet, 5.3.306

    What the pair proves

    The fathers address each other in only two scenes: Montague's 'villain' across the street in 1.1, Capulet's 'brother' over the bodies in 5.3. The word changes because the children's marriage made them kin, and they learn of the marriage only when it can no longer be lived.

  • ‘Three civil brawls bred of an airy word / By thee…’‘Three civil brawls bred of an airy word / By thee, old Capulet, and Montague, / Have thrice disturbed the quiet of our streets’Prince, 1.1.91

    answered by

    ‘As rich shall Romeo's by his lady's lie, / Poor sacrifices of our enmity.’Capulet, 5.3.314

    What the pair proves

    The feud began, as far as anyone can say, from 'an airy word' and ends priced in gold and children: nothing on one side of the account, everything on the other. Capulet, one of the two fathers the Prince named in 1.1, finally names the hatred as 'our enmity'.

  • ‘My only love sprung from my only hate!’Juliet, 1.5.152

    answered by

    ‘Where be these enemies? Capulet, Montague…’‘Where be these enemies? Capulet, Montague, / See what a scourge is laid upon your hate, / That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love’Prince, 5.3.301

    What the pair proves

    In 1.5 Juliet speaks the house's hatred as her own, 'my only hate'; in 5.3 the Prince hands it back to the fathers, 'your hate': the children inherited it, and the verdict returns it to its owners.

  • ‘And so, good Capulet, which name I tender…’‘And so, good Capulet, which name I tender / As dearly as mine own, be satisfied.’Romeo, 3.1.72

    answered by

    ‘Tybalt, liest thou there in thy bloody sheet? / O…’‘Tybalt, liest thou there in thy bloody sheet? / O, what more favor can I do to thee / Than with that hand that cut thy youth in twain / To sunder his that was thine enemy? / Forgive me, cousin.’Romeo, 5.3.97

    What the pair proves

    The kinship Romeo could not explain to Tybalt in the street is spoken at last in the Capulet vault, 'Forgive me, cousin'. The lovers' peace with the other house is real, but it can be said only where nobody can answer.

Links to other themes

The strongest answers show one theme driving another, rather than writing about each on its own.

  • Gender and honour

    Manhood is the currency the feud spends. The servants dare their enemies to prove it, ‘Draw if you be men’, and in 3.1 the code reads Romeo's peace as ‘vile submission’. The hand-off is 3.1, where Romeo accepts the code's word for his peace, ‘effeminate’, and the peacemaker becomes a killer; after it, the same code, turned on a daughter, takes over the Capulet house. In 5.3 the last fight starts with the code's word, ‘have at thee, boy!’

  • Family and authority

    The feud is the parents' inheritance, kept by the old and fought by the young: the Prologue makes the rage the parents' and the cost the children's, ‘but their children's end’. The hand-off is 3.5, where its violence moves indoors: Lady Capulet plans a poisoning as comfort and Capulet's threats, ‘My fingers itch’, take the place of the swords Act 4 no longer has. It ends at the tomb, where the Prologue's terms are met and the fathers end the quarrel by becoming family, ‘O brother Montague, give me thy hand’: the household authority that kept the feud alive is the one that makes the peace.

  • Fate

    Fate and the feud share the Prologue's second quatrain, and the play never separates them: the lovers come ‘From forth the fatal loins of these two foes’, so the stars and the enemies are one inheritance. The hand-off is 3.1, where a killing the feud's code demanded is blamed on Fortune within fifteen lines, ‘O, I am Fortune's fool!’. When the feud falls silent in Acts 4 and 5, chance does its work instead, a sealed house and a letter that never leaves Verona; and the Prince's verdict makes heaven the hatred's punisher, with love as its means: ‘See what a scourge is laid upon your hate’.

  • Love

    The feud gives the love its danger and its secrecy, and the secrecy disarms the love's peace. Juliet can only name her love through the hate, ‘My only love sprung from my only hate!’, and Romeo laughs at ‘twenty of their swords’. The hand-off is 3.1, where the secret marriage makes Romeo refuse Tybalt with a reason nobody can be told, ‘good Capulet, which name I tender’, so his peace reads as cowardice and Mercutio fights. The love ends the feud only as the Prince says: heaven finds means to kill the fathers' joys 'with love'.

Don't get caught out

Slips students often make about this theme, and what is true instead.

  • Myth: Mercutio is a Montague.

    In fact: He belongs to neither house: he is the Prince's kinsman, which is why he can curse both families and why the feud's first death is the ruler's loss.

    Romeo calls him ‘the Prince's near ally’, and the Prince mourns him as his own: ‘My blood for your rude brawls doth lie a-bleeding’.

  • Myth: Romeo murders Tybalt, perhaps because they both loved Juliet.

    In fact: Tybalt is Juliet's cousin, not a rival. Romeo refuses to fight him and kills him only in revenge for Mercutio. Say 'kills', and give the cause.

    Mercutio's own words fix the order, ‘I was hurt under your arm’, and Romeo's choice follows: ‘And fire-eyed fury be my conduct now’.

  • Myth: The secret marriage ends the feud.

    In fact: That was the Friar's hope, and it fails: kept secret, the marriage cannot reconcile anyone, and the families learn of it only in the tomb. The Prologue had already said what would end the rage.

    The Friar hopes the alliance will ‘turn your households' rancor to pure love’; the Chorus has said that nothing could do it ‘but their children's end’.

  • Myth: The reconciliation is a happy ending: the feud is solved.

    In fact: The feud is over, but AQA's November 2020 mark scheme puts it exactly: the conflict is 'only resolved through death'. The peace comes after six deaths, and once the fathers have joined hands its next acts are a bid ('But I can give thee more') and a match ('As rich'): whether that is generosity or the old contest in gold is for an answer to argue.

    Capulet calls the dead lovers ‘Poor sacrifices of our enmity’, and the Prince calls the result ‘A glooming peace’.

  • Myth: 'A plague o' both your houses' is about the Black Death.

    In fact: A 'plague' was any affliction, and Mercutio is cursing two families, not naming a disease. Real plague enters the play only in 5.2, where fear of it seals Friar John in a house: an answer may call that an irony that makes the curse come true, never Mercutio's meaning.

    The curse falls on lineages, ‘A plague o' both your houses!’; the quarantine comes two acts later, ‘Sealed up the doors and would not let us forth’.

  • Myth: The feud stands for England's religious strife between Catholics and Protestants.

    In fact: No line in the play carries that. Shakespeare gives the feud no cause at all, and part of the play's point is that nobody can say how it began.

    The Prince traces the brawls only to ‘an airy word’, and his question about the ‘vile beginners of this fray’ in 3.1 can be answered only for that afternoon.

In the exam

Questions on this theme

AQA prints an extract and asks about it and the play as a whole: leave either out and the answer is capped at Level 2. An ‘Explore how’ question wants one argument about how the theme works; a ‘How far’ question also wants a judgement on how true the claim is.

  1. AQA November 2020Explore how

    Starting with this speech, explore how Shakespeare presents the effects of the conflict between the Capulet and Montague families.

    Extract from Act 1, Scene 1: The brawl and the lovesick son

    Worked below: Five-minute plan

  2. AQA June 2017Explore how

    Starting with this conversation, explore how Shakespeare presents aggressive male behaviour in Romeo and Juliet.

    Extract from Act 1, Scene 1: The brawl and the lovesick son

  3. PracticeHow far

    Starting with this moment in the play, explore how far Shakespeare presents the ending of the feud as hopeful.

    Extract from Act 5, Scene 3: The tomb and the glooming peace

    Worked below: Thesis ladder

  4. PracticeExplore how

    Starting with this conversation, explore how Shakespeare presents Tybalt in Romeo and Juliet.

    Extract from Act 1, Scene 5: Love at the enemy's feast

  5. PracticeExplore how

    Starting with this speech, explore how Shakespeare presents the Prince's authority in Romeo and Juliet.

    Extract from Act 3, Scene 1: A word and a blow

  6. PracticeExplore how

    Starting with this conversation, explore how Shakespeare presents the relationship between Romeo and Tybalt in Romeo and Juliet.

    Extract from Act 3, Scene 1: A word and a blow

From thesis to Level 6

One question, climbing the mark scheme a level at a time. These are models of the move, not sentences to learn: examiners recognise memorised openings, so make each move in your own words.

PracticeHow far

Starting with this moment in the play, explore how far Shakespeare presents the ending of the feud as hopeful.

Extract from Act 5, Scene 3: The tomb and the glooming peace

  1. Level 311 to 15 marks
    Explained

    The ending of the feud is hopeful because Capulet and Montague shake hands and become friends after Romeo and Juliet die.

    What lifts it: A relevant point with a reference, but it describes the ending instead of judging it, and ignores both the price and the word 'glooming'.

  2. Level 416 to 20 marks
    Clear

    Shakespeare presents the ending as partly hopeful, because the feud finally ends, but also sad, because it takes the deaths of Romeo and Juliet to end it.

    What lifts it: Clear and balanced, but 'partly' only lists two sides; nothing explains how the ending makes us weigh them against each other.

  3. Level 521 to 25 marks
    Thoughtful

    The ending is hopeful in what it does and bleak in how: the fathers' handshake ends a feud that three brawls and a Prince could not, but only because, as the Prologue promised, nothing 'but their children's end' could remove the rage, and the Prince's 'glooming peace' holds both.

    What lifts it: Thoughtful and whole-play: it ties the ending to the Prologue and the first scene, and reads one phrase for its double meaning.

  4. Level 626 to 30 marks
    ConceptualisedThe aim

    Shakespeare ends the feud in its own currency: the fathers outbid each other in gold ('But I can give thee more'), which shows how little they have changed as well as how much they have lost. The ending is hopeful for Verona's quiet and hopeless for its future, because the heirs who might have inherited the peace were its price.

    What lifts it: Conceptualised: one whole-play idea (the feud's currency), a committed answer to 'how far' that holds its counter in the same sentence, and a method read for its effect (the bidding). It models the move; argue your own position from your own evidence.

On recent grade boundaries a grade 9 needs roughly 26 to 27 of these 30 marks: a secure Level 6, not a borderline one.

Test your own thesis

  • It answers this question, including its ‘how far’.

  • It covers the whole play, not one scene.

  • It says why Shakespeare presents the theme this way.

  • Someone could argue against it.

From the extract to the whole play

Whatever the extract, the marks for the whole play come from moving out of it. Pick your extract to see where to take conflict next, and what each move proves.

Your extract is from

The extract: Act 1, Scene 1: The brawl and the lovesick son

AQA June 2017 ('My naked weapon is out' to 'but I bite my thumb, sir', on aggressive male behaviour) and November 2020 ('Rebellious subjects, enemies to peace' to 'all men depart', on the effects of the conflict)

The Prince's speech (1.1.83 to 105, November 2020) shows the conflict's effects as a ruler sees them: rebellion against the state, neighbours' blood in the street, the city's old men in arms. Argue that these public effects are the only ones visible yet, and that the play spends the rest of its length moving them indoors and onto the young.

Act 1Act 2Act 3Act 4Act 5
The extract1Where to go next, in order
  1. Start in the extract (Act 1, Scene 1), then move out into the play.

  2. 1

    Earlier: Prologue: The ending, told first

    ‘And the continuance of their parents' rage, / Which…’‘And the continuance of their parents' rage, / Which, but their children's end, naught could remove’Chorus, PRO.10

    Prologue: the effect the Prince cannot see yet, the children's deaths, is the only cure the play allows.

  3. 2

    Later: Act 3, Scene 1: A word and a blow

    ‘I have an interest in your hearts' proceeding…’‘I have an interest in your hearts' proceeding: / My blood for your rude brawls doth lie a-bleeding.’Prince, 3.1.198

    3.1: the next brawl breaks his law and kills his own kinsman, so the state becomes one of the feud's victims.

  4. 3

    Later: Act 4, Scene 3: Alone with the vial

    ‘O look, methinks I see my cousin's ghost…’‘O look, methinks I see my cousin's ghost / Seeking out Romeo that did spit his body / Upon a rapier's point! Stay, Tybalt, stay!’Juliet, 4.3.56

    4.3: with no brawl and no Prince in Act 4, the feud survives as a girl's terror of her family's vault.

  5. 4

    Later: Act 5, Scene 3: The tomb and the glooming peace

    ‘As rich shall Romeo's by his lady's lie, / Poor sacrifices of our enmity.’Capulet, 5.3.314

    5.3: the effects end on the children, as the Prologue said they would, and a father at last counts them the price of 'our enmity'.

A five-minute plan

Moves, not paragraphs. Copy the grid onto paper and fill it in for a question you have not seen, in five minutes.

Give the Shakespeare essay about 50 minutes: plan first, move between the extract and the whole play as you write, and end with a judgement.

The question

AQA November 2020Explore how

Starting with this speech, explore how Shakespeare presents the effects of the conflict between the Capulet and Montague families.

Extract from Act 1, Scene 1: The brawl and the lovesick son

1. Thesis

AO1: Ideas and interpretation

Shakespeare presents the conflict's effects as starting in public and ending in private: the Prince counts its cost to the state ('Rebellious subjects', stained steel, old men in arms), and the play then carries that cost indoors and onto the young, until the law's price for the next brawl is paid by children rather than by the fathers it named.

2. In the extract

AO2: Language, form and structure
  • 'Rebellious subjects': the speech opens on the conflict's effect on the state, a private quarrel charged as rebellion against the peace, and names no one until it reaches the two fathers.
  • 'purple fountains': the brawlers put out their rage with blood from their own veins, so the image makes the feud self-wounding, a cost 3.1 will make literal.
  • 'ancient citizens': the effect reaches men of neither house, old men who lay aside their dignity to take up 'old partisans' and part the fight, so the feud conscripts the whole city.
  • 'an airy word': a weightless cause against heavy effects; hold that imbalance, because 5.3 settles the account in gold and children.
  • 'Your lives': the law sets the price of the next brawl on the fathers; follow that price through the play and show that it is collected from others.

3. Across the play, in order

AO1: Ideas and interpretation
  1. ‘I have an interest in your hearts' proceeding…’‘I have an interest in your hearts' proceeding: / My blood for your rude brawls doth lie a-bleeding.’Prince, 3.1.198

    3.1: the next brawl comes and kills, and its cost reaches the Prince's own family, 'My blood': the state the 1.1 speech defended is now a mourner, and the death it threatened softens into exile.

  2. ‘We will have vengeance for it, fear thou not…’‘We will have vengeance for it, fear thou not. / Then weep no more. I'll send to one in Mantua, / Where that same banished runagate doth live, / Shall give him such an unaccustomed dram / That he shall soon keep Tybalt company.’Lady Capulet, 3.5.92

    3.5: the effect moves indoors and changes hands: refused revenge by the Prince, Lady Capulet plans it privately, 'We will have vengeance for it', and offers it as comfort to a daughter secretly married to its target.

  3. ‘O look, methinks I see my cousin's ghost…’‘O look, methinks I see my cousin's ghost / Seeking out Romeo that did spit his body / Upon a rapier's point! Stay, Tybalt, stay!’Juliet, 4.3.56

    4.3: the effect has reached someone who never fought: alone with the vial, Juliet sees Tybalt's ghost 'Seeking out Romeo', the street fight replayed in her mind.

  4. ‘And I, for winking at your discords too…’‘And I, for winking at your discords too, / Have lost a brace of kinsmen. All are punished.’Prince, 5.3.304

    5.3: the price of 1.1 is paid, but not by the men it named: both fathers live, and the Prince counts himself among the punished, 'for winking at your discords too'.

4. Context

AO3: Context

One clause on the Prince's refusal of Lady Capulet's 'Romeo must not live': in the Geneva Bible's letter to the Romans, vengeance belonged to God and to the ruler who bears the sword, never to a family, so his exile keeps the sword in the state's hand, and her poison plot in 3.5 is the feud taking it back.

5. Another reading

AO3: Context

Weigh Adams's prudent Prince, merciful on what Benvolio tells him, against Liebler's Verona, whose authorities fail their young: the mercy is reasonable in 3.1 and fatal by 5.3.

6. Judgement

AO1: Ideas and interpretation

The speech is the play's first and smallest account of the conflict's effects: it counts noise, fear and old men in arms, and by 5.3 the account holds two of the Prince's kinsmen, Tybalt, a mother and both heirs, while the two fathers it named survive.

AO1: your argument and references. AO2: how Shakespeare’s methods make meaning. AO3: the ideas and context behind the theme.

Upgrade your sentences

Sentence-level moves, not paragraphs to memorise. Learn what each upgrade does, then make the same move with a different quotation.

  1. Weak

    The Prince is angry and threatens the families, which shows he has authority.

    Stronger

    The Prince calls the brawlers 'Rebellious subjects' before he calls them men, so a family quarrel becomes a crime against the state, and the effect he fears is on Verona's order rather than on either house's honour.

    What changed: It reads a method, how he addresses them, for its effect, and keeps the question's word, effects, in view.

  2. Weak

    Shakespeare uses the noun 'plague' to show that Mercutio is angry.

    Stronger

    Mercutio, who belongs to neither house, curses 'both your houses', so the feud's first death falls on an outsider, the Prince's kinsman, and the curse widens the conflict's effects beyond the two families.

    What changed: No word-class label: it ties the line to who speaks it and turns a fact about Mercutio into an argument about effects.

  3. Weak

    Romeo murders Tybalt because he is impulsive.

    Stronger

    Romeo refuses Tybalt and steps between the swords, and only after Mercutio is 'hurt under your arm' does he send 'respective lenity' to heaven and kill Tybalt: the feud takes him back through his own peacemaking.

    What changed: The right verb and the right order of events: the sentence shows a chain of causes where the weak one gives a label.

  4. Weak

    In those days families had feuds and honour was very important, so the audience would understand the fighting.

    Stronger

    Lady Capulet asks the Prince to make revenge the law, 'For blood of ours, shed blood of Montague', and his refusal sets the state's justice against the feud's: the line Paul's letter to the Romans drew when it made vengeance God's and the ruler's, not a family's.

    What changed: Context as an idea tied to a line and to the question's focus, instead of a generalisation about 'those days'.

  5. Weak

    At the end the families make up, so the conflict is finally resolved.

    Stronger

    The fathers end the feud by bidding in gold, 'But I can give thee more': generosity between enemies, or the old contest in a new currency; the Prince's 'glooming' leans towards the second, a peace sealed without joy.

    What changed: It reaches the ending, weighs two readings of one line, then judges.

What examiners mark down

Read a plan or a practice answer against this list, and tick each trap you have kept out of it.

PreviousFateNextFamily and authority

On this page

  • The shape of the theme
  • Through the play
  • Who carries it
  • How Shakespeare presents it
  • Context that counts
  • The big debates
  • Quotes that answer each other
  • Links to other themes
  • Don't get caught out
  • In the exam