Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1.3 Short and extended response question types
Sign up

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261
Question 29

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented community repair events.

Text One: An account of a repair session at a local library

At the library session, each visitor first described the fault with the item they had brought. A volunteer wrote this down and directed the visitor to a table where someone had experience with that kind of repair. Visitors stayed with their items, so they could ask questions while work was being done.

The first list of jobs had seemed manageable, but two volunteers were delayed and several visitors had arrived together. The organiser changed the order of the appointments, giving shorter jobs a place while people waited. A notice at the entrance was updated so visitors could see the revised order.

At the end, a sheet recorded which items had been repaired, which needed another appointment and which could not be repaired at the session. Visitors could take a copy of the advice given about their item. The organiser thanked the volunteers who had welcomed visitors, kept the list and tidied the room as well as those who had worked at the tables.

Text Two: A report on a repair afternoon at a community hall

For the hall's repair afternoon, visitors booked a time and described their item in advance. The organisers used these descriptions to decide which volunteers should be available. They also set aside a table where visitors could watch a demonstration of simple mending while waiting for their appointment.

On the day, some appointments took longer than expected. Rather than keep the original schedule, the team asked waiting visitors whether they preferred to wait or return later. They put a board by the entrance showing the current waiting time and any changes to the schedule.

After the event, organisers sent visitors a short account of what had been attempted and what they could do next. A record of the afternoon included the number of appointments and the kinds of items brought in. The report thanked the volunteers who had prepared the booking list and demonstration as well as those who had carried out repairs. Visitors were invited to suggest what would make a future session more useful.

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about organising and running a community repair event.

In your answer, bring together information from both texts about:

  • how visitors and repair jobs are organised;
  • how the organisers respond when plans need to change;
  • how visitors are informed and different contributions are recognised.
[8]
Markscheme

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

382 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions