Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1.3 Short and extended response question types
Sign up

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261
Question 122

Consulting people in different ways

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented people, places or projects.

Text One: An original report about an invented consultation on changes to a market square.

The organisers used three methods to gather views. At a public meeting, 62 people heard the proposals together. Eighteen spoke during the discussion, and several participants developed a shared suggestion about changing delivery times. Other people stayed to listen but did not contribute aloud.

An online questionnaire received 214 responses. Everyone ranked the three proposed plans, while 73 respondents also wrote comments explaining concerns about seating and shelter. The rankings made preferences easy to compare, although the shortest comments gave little indication of why a plan had been chosen.

Finally, 11 people joined a guided walk around the square. The group included market traders and people using pushchairs or wheelchairs. By following the proposed route, they identified a sloping entrance that would be difficult for some visitors to use. The walk produced detailed practical evidence, but it involved far fewer people than the other methods.

The final report combined the findings instead of treating the results from one method as sufficient.

Text Two: An original information table about an invented consultation on alterations to a neighbourhood hall.

Consultation formatParticipationEvidence collectedLimitation recorded by the organisers
Open workshop28 people attended; 14 contributed aloudParticipants discussed competing room layouts and agreed a possible compromiseSome attenders listened without speaking
Postal choice card167 cards were returned; 121 selected a quieter meeting roomA clear preference could be countedPeople selected between two options without giving reasons
Timed access trial15 booked participants moved through the proposed layoutCongestion was observed beside the storage doorOnly a small, pre-arranged group took part

After reviewing both projects, a committee member concluded: "A public meeting is the most useful consultation format."

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about the strengths and limitations of different ways of gathering people's views. Use your synthesis to evaluate the committee member's conclusion.

[8]
Markscheme

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

382 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions