Text A: an original contemporary practice extract.
I turned the radio on while sorting the papers that had gathered beside my desk. I expected it to be background noise; instead, the presenter’s account of a small village competition made me stop folding. I knew nothing about the place, yet the people speaking sounded close enough to interrupt my afternoon in a pleasant way.
The programme did not make the work disappear. I still had to decide which papers to keep and which to recycle. But the changing voices gave the room a sense of company without asking anything of me. When the broadcast ended, the silence seemed sharper than it had before.
I do not need a voice in every quiet moment. Sometimes I put the radio away and enjoy the room as it is. Still, I have begun to choose a programme when a routine task feels too solitary. It is a small kind of company, and small is exactly what I want.
Text B: an original contemporary practice extract.
I switched the radio on to make the kitchen feel less empty while I prepared supper. For a while it worked: a voice, a tune, another voice. Then I found myself listening for the next item instead of watching the pan. I turned it off and heard the room again, including the sound that told me the water was boiling.
This is not a complaint about the programmes. I enjoy them when I can give them my attention. But when I use them to fill every pause, I begin to treat silence as a problem to solve. It can be useful to notice what is happening around me, or simply to let a thought finish without someone else speaking over it.
I still put the radio on at breakfast, when I want a gentle start and have little to concentrate on. In the kitchen at supper, I prefer to hear the task. The same broadcast can be welcome company one hour and an interruption the next; it depends on what I need to attend to.
Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about listening to the radio while doing everyday tasks. Support your comparisons with detailed references to both texts.