The questions after the talk
Text A: an original contemporary practice extract.
I missed the community talk because my train arrived late, but the organiser sent a recording afterwards. I expected to value the prepared speech most. Instead, I returned to a question from the audience about an assumption the speaker had passed over quickly. The answer made the earlier argument less tidy and more interesting.
Hearing the question mattered. The speaker’s answer alone would have sounded like another point in a polished sequence. The hesitation and the careful explanation of what the questioner meant showed somebody testing the argument from a different position. I was not present to ask my own question, yet I could hear the talk becoming an exchange rather than only a delivery.
I would make the recording arrangements clear before inviting people to speak, and offer a way to ask without appearing in a shared recording. Not every contribution needs to become a public clip. But an appropriately recorded discussion can let an absent listener encounter the questions that changed a prepared talk, not merely receive the version that existed before anyone answered back.
Text B: an original contemporary practice extract.
Dear organisers, thank you for making last week’s lecture available afterwards. I am less certain about the complete audience discussion remaining online. When I asked my question, I was trying to clarify one phrase with the speaker in the room. The recording preserves the phrase I tried first, the correction that followed and a close view of me making both.
I was not ashamed of the question. I simply had not expected an unfinished attempt to become the form in which strangers would encounter it later. A written account could have conveyed the issue and the answer without asking my face and every hesitation to accompany them. The value of a discussion is not always identical to the value of keeping its entire performance.
Please explain the options before the next event and give contributors a genuine choice about being included. Keep useful questions and the ways they challenge a talk, but consider whether every detail of their delivery needs the same audience for the same length of time. A question can be offered to a room without its owner wishing to remain permanently at the microphone.
Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about recording audience questions at public talks. Support your comparisons with detailed references to both texts.
260 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE English Language 2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types, covering 2.3.9 Write an article, 2.3.10 Write a letter, 2.3.11 Write a review, 2.3.12 Write a text for a speech, and 2.3.13 Write a section for a guide, textbook, leaflet or booklet. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.