Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287
Question 121

The fold that went wrong

Text: an original contemporary exhibition-review-style practice extract.

The demonstrator lifted a square of blue paper and folded it with the brisk confidence of someone closing an envelope. Each crease was pressed flat with a thumbnail. Around the table, we watched the corners meet exactly. I expected the finished shape to be another neat object behind glass: pleasing, sealed off and already understood.

The final fold refused to lie flat. One corner sprang upwards; the paper made a small, dry crackle. The demonstrator stopped, then turned the sheet rather than forcing it down. A white triangle showed through the blue, and the shape opened into something like a bird with one uneven wing. The room leaned closer. Nobody was asked to add anything; the change had come from the paper itself, and from the decision not to hide its stubborn crease.

I had mistaken the demonstration for a lesson in control. What stayed with me was the pause before the sheet was turned: a moment when the tidy result seemed lost. The uneven wing did not look like a mistake to be corrected. It gave the paper direction. By the time the next square was lifted, I was watching for what might resist the plan.

Analyse how the writer uses language and structure to interest and engage the reader.

In your answer, consider:

  • language features and techniques
  • structural techniques
  • the effect on the reader.

Support your views with detailed reference to the extract.

[15]
Markscheme

2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types

834 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE English Language 2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types, covering 2.3.9 Write an article, 2.3.10 Write a letter, 2.3.11 Write a review, 2.3.12 Write a text for a speech, and 2.3.13 Write a section for a guide, textbook, leaflet or booklet. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank