Waiting for the haircut
Text A: an original contemporary practice extract.
The barber entered my name on a waiting list and said a message would arrive when my turn was close. I could buy the bread I needed instead of spending the next half-hour looking at the backs of other people’s heads. When the message arrived, I was two doors away and returned in time. My place had continued to exist while I was elsewhere.
I do not think every visit needs an application or an account. This system used a name and a number for that visit, and the barber also offered to call out a name for anyone who preferred to stay. What helped was the clear estimate and the explanation that the message meant return soon, rather than that the chair was already empty.
A waiting list cannot make the haircut quicker. It can make the waiting less wasteful, provided people know how much freedom they have and what happens if they return late. I would choose the message again. Having a place in a queue need not mean having to remain physically attached to it.
Text B: an original contemporary practice extract.
The new waiting list made our repair counter look much calmer. Customers could leave their number and receive a message instead of standing in a line. By lunchtime, however, several had returned together. A complicated repair had delayed the estimates, then three short jobs had moved the list faster than expected.
The message told customers to return, but not how soon they needed to be here or whether their place would be kept. One had gone to the far end of the shopping centre; another had stayed beside the counter because she did not trust the estimate. We had transferred the uncertainty to people’s phones without explaining how to manage it.
We still offer the digital list, alongside the option to wait here. Now we explain the return period and send an updated estimate when the schedule changes substantially. The screen’s list is useful, but the quiet counter is not proof that everyone is waiting comfortably. Sometimes the questions have merely walked out of sight.
Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about digital waiting lists for walk-in services. Support your comparisons with detailed references to both texts.
260 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE English Language 2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types, covering 2.3.9 Write an article, 2.3.10 Write a letter, 2.3.11 Write a review, 2.3.12 Write a text for a speech, and 2.3.13 Write a section for a guide, textbook, leaflet or booklet. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.