The number beside the door
Text A: an original contemporary practice extract.
At the training centre, my appointment was in room 214. The sign at the stairs explained that the first digit indicated the floor. I climbed to the second floor, followed the numbers and found the door without needing to describe my appointment to anybody at reception. The number was plain, but it did a useful job.
Room names can be pleasant. They can also require knowledge a visitor does not have. At another building, someone sent me to Cedar as though the tree’s position inside the building were obvious. A simple sequence would have spared us both a second conversation. I did not need the building to be memorable; I needed to be in the right place at the right time.
Keep distinctive names where people like them, but give every room a number with an understandable pattern and put that pattern where newcomers enter. Familiar staff can use whatever shorthand they prefer. A public building should offer a route that works before a visitor becomes familiar with it.
Text B: an original contemporary practice extract.
Our rooms used to be called Studio, Workshop and Meeting Room. Their new numbers were intended to simplify bookings, but visitors now ask which of three identical corridors contains room 17. The numbering follows the order in which the building was extended, rather than the order in which anyone can walk through it.
A number can sound more precise than a name while telling you less. Studio suggested what happened behind the door; 17 tells you nothing unless somebody supplies the missing pattern. Reception staff have begun adding the old names to appointment messages because those names still connect a room with a purpose people recognise.
Numbers are useful when the route gives them meaning. They are not a substitute for signs, visible maps or a booking message that describes where to go. We could keep both forms of identification. The aim is a visitor arriving at the right room, rather than a list of rooms that looks tidier on a spreadsheet.
Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about numbering rooms in public buildings. Support your comparisons with detailed references to both texts.
260 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE English Language 2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types, covering 2.3.9 Write an article, 2.3.10 Write a letter, 2.3.11 Write a review, 2.3.12 Write a text for a speech, and 2.3.13 Write a section for a guide, textbook, leaflet or booklet. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.