Unlimited liability
Unlimited liability: the owner is personally responsible for all the debts of the business, with no limit, so personal possessions can be sold to pay them.
- An unincorporated business has no legal identity of its own, so its debts are simply the owner's debts.
- If the business cannot pay, a court can order the owner's savings, car and even their home to be sold to settle what is owed.
- It applies to sole traders and partnerships, and in a partnership debts run up by one partner can be recovered from the others.
- The effect on behaviour is real, because an owner whose house is at stake turns down the risky contract and grows more slowly than they otherwise might.
- A sole trader builder in Bristol buys £40,000 of materials on trade credit for a large extension.
- The customer runs out of money halfway through, so no final payment ever arrives.
- The £40,000 is still owed to the merchant, and because he has unlimited liability the debt is his personally.
- His savings can be taken to cover it, and if they fall short his house can be sold.
Limited liability
Limited liability: the owners of a company can only lose the money they invested in it, because the company is a separate legal person and the debts belong to the company.
- It applies to private limited companies and public limited companies, the two incorporated structures.
- Shareholders' personal possessions are protected, because they are not liable for the debts of the business.
- There is a guaranteed limit to their losses, since only the amount paid for the shares can be lost.
- Knowing the worst case in advance is what makes outside investment possible, because somebody will risk £5,000 on a stranger's business when they would never risk their house on it.
- The people who carry the risk instead are the suppliers and lenders, who may go unpaid when a limited company fails.

- Limited liability does not mean the business has a limited amount of money.
- It means the shareholders' losses are limited to what they invested, and some of the largest companies in the UK have it.
- It also does not mean the debts disappear, because the company still owes the money and its own assets are still sold to pay what it can.
Choosing a structure for a new start-up
- Most new businesses start as sole traders, because it is quick, cheap, private and needs no accounts to be published.
- That suits a start-up whose risks and costs are small, such as a private tutor or a freelance designer, where the worst case is a few hundred pounds of unsold time.
- A partnership makes sense when the start-up needs more capital or skills than one person has, though joint unlimited liability means the partners must trust each other.
- Incorporating from day one is worth the extra cost when the business will borrow heavily or work in a sector where a single mistake is expensive, such as food manufacturing or construction.
- So for a start-up the decision turns on how much could go wrong and how much money is needed, not on how ambitious the owner feels.
Choosing a structure for a large established business
- A large business almost always needs limited liability, because the sums it owes at any moment are far beyond what any individual could cover.
- A private limited company suits an established firm that wants the protection and the extra finance while keeping decisions inside the family.
- A public limited company suits a firm that needs sums only the stock market can supply, and whose owners accept outside shareholders as the price.
- The drawbacks of floating are real, since the founders can be outvoted, a rival can mount a takeover, the accounts are public, and floating itself costs a large sum in fees.
- Greggs shows the whole journey in one business.
- It began in 1939 as a small family bakery in Newcastle.
- It floated on the stock market in 1984, raising the finance to expand well beyond the North East.
- As a plc it now runs more than two thousand shops, a scale no family could have funded from profit alone.
- The trade-off is visible in every set of results, because the board now answers to thousands of shareholders rather than to one family.
Recommending a structure
- When you are asked to advise a business on changing structure, build the answer on four things rather than listing every feature you know.
- Control and decision making, because moving from sole trader to Ltd means sharing decisions that used to be one person's.
- Liability, because incorporating protects the owner's home and that protection is worth more the riskier the sector is.
- Finance and access to capital, because share capital does not have to be repaid whereas a loan does.
- Growth potential, because the structure has to fit where the business is trying to get to, not just where it is now.
- Then weigh the loss of control against the ability to raise finance that never has to be repaid, and commit to an answer rather than leaving both sides open.
- The short stem to have ready is explain one benefit to shareholders of limited liability, which has appeared word for word in more than one series.
- The answer wanted is the guaranteed limit to their losses, since only the amount the shareholder paid for their shares can be lost.
- The long one reads X is considering changing the legal structure from a sole trader to a private limited company, advise X whether this is a good idea, where the four headings above give you the shape of the answer.
- Define limited liability.
- Which two legal structures have unlimited liability?
- Explain one benefit to shareholders of limited liability.
- Give one reason a low-risk start-up might stay a sole trader.
- Name the four things to build a recommendation on legal structure around.