34:I[196793,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"Gingerbread"] 36:I[647935,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"RecordResourceResume"] 37:I[830476,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"FlashcardAccessBranch"] 38:I[315438,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"TopicFlashcardRunner"] 25:[["$","$L34",null,{"feature":"flashcards"}],"$L35",["$","$L36",null,{"href":"/a-level/history/ocr/the-rise-and-decline-of-the-mughal-empire-in-india-1526-1739/flashcards","label":"The Rise and Decline of the Mughal Empire in India 1526–1739","subjectCode":"a_level_history__ocr","surface":"flashcards"}],["$","$L37",null,{"runner":["$","div",null,{"className":"min-h-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden bg-background","children":["$","$L38",null,{"decks":[{"id":"14a465ae-076e-4f16-b0ba-66ed558636a0","title":"The Rise and Decline of the Mughal Empire in India 1526–1739 Flashcards","topicId":"790492e1-df9a-511f-a283-a37ec40e90eb","topicSlug":"the-rise-and-decline-of-the-mughal-empire-in-india-1526-1739","cards":[{"id":"e69b0046-bbaf-4c8b-83d8-2e040a5952de","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What was the immediate political result of the First Battle of Panipat, 1526?","back":"Babur destroyed Lodi control of Delhi.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Babur destroyed Lodi control of Delhi.","correct":true,"explanation":"Ibrahim Lodi’s defeat and death ended his dynasty’s rule at Delhi, allowing Babur to occupy the capital and establish Mughal political power in northern India."},{"text":"Babur restored Timurid control of Samarkand.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Babur’s earlier Central Asian ambitions with his Indian conquest. Panipat destroyed Lodi control of Delhi, enabling Babur to establish power in northern India."},{"text":"Ibrahim Lodi strengthened Afghan control of Delhi.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the battle’s outcome: Ibrahim Lodi was defeated and killed. Babur therefore destroyed Lodi control of Delhi and occupied the sultanate’s political centre."},{"text":"Rana Sanga established Rajput control of Delhi.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rana Sanga was not the victor at Panipat and later fought Babur at Khanwa. The immediate result was Babur’s destruction of Lodi control of Delhi."}]},{"id":"8f28bb3c-07b8-4e48-8651-24e2cadd22dd","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why could Babur defeat the larger Lodi army at Panipat?","back":"He used artillery, defensive carts and disciplined cavalry.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"He used artillery, defensive carts and disciplined cavalry.","correct":true,"explanation":"Babur combined gunpowder artillery with linked defensive carts and coordinated cavalry manoeuvres. These tactics disrupted and surrounded the larger but less effectively organised Lodi army."},{"text":"He used war elephants, massed infantry and naval support.","correct":false,"explanation":"This attributes Lodi-style elephants and irrelevant naval power to Babur. He won by combining artillery and defensive carts with disciplined, mobile cavalry tactics."},{"text":"He gained Rajput reinforcements, Afghan defectors and a larger army.","correct":false,"explanation":"Babur did not win through superior numbers or decisive Rajput reinforcements. His smaller army prevailed because artillery, defensive carts and disciplined cavalry were used together effectively."},{"text":"He relied on longbows, heavy infantry and surprise night attacks.","correct":false,"explanation":"These were not the decisive features of Babur’s battle plan. His advantage came from gunpowder artillery, a defensive cart barrier and well-coordinated cavalry manoeuvres."}]},{"id":"f90f95b9-00c7-4db1-ab03-6611ef47a87b","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Babur captured [ ] in [ ], giving him a base to invade India.","back":"Babur captured Kabul in 1504, giving him a base to invade India.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Babur captured Kabul in 1504, giving him a base to invade India.","correct":true,"explanation":"Babur seized Kabul in 1504 after losing his Central Asian possessions. Its strategic location provided a secure base from which he could launch campaigns into India."},{"text":"Babur captured Kandahar in 1504, giving him a base to invade India.","correct":false,"explanation":"This substitutes Kandahar for the city that became Babur’s main base. He captured Kabul in 1504, gaining a strategically useful position for later invasions of India."},{"text":"Babur captured Kabul in 1526, giving him a base to invade India.","correct":false,"explanation":"The place is correct, but the date is confused with the First Battle of Panipat. Babur captured Kabul in 1504, long before his decisive Indian invasion."},{"text":"Babur captured Samarkand in 1497, giving him a base to invade India.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although Babur briefly captured Samarkand in 1497, it did not become his lasting base for Indian expansion. Kabul, captured in 1504, served that purpose."}]},{"id":"e4f19a1e-372d-448c-abbf-1ddfb2fa8c42","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What did Babur’s defeat of Rana Sanga at Khanwa, 1527, show?","back":"Rajput resistance was serious but not united enough.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Rajput resistance was serious but not united enough.","correct":true,"explanation":"Rana Sanga led a powerful coalition that posed a genuine threat to Babur. Its defeat showed both the strength of Rajput opposition and its insufficient unity."},{"text":"Afghan resistance was serious but not united enough.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Khanwa with Babur’s struggles against Afghan forces such as the Lodis. Khanwa demonstrated that Rajput resistance was formidable but insufficiently united to defeat him."},{"text":"Rajput resistance was weak and already fully divided.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rana Sanga’s coalition presented a serious military challenge, so describing Rajput resistance as weak understates it. Babur’s victory showed that this strong opposition lacked sufficient unity."},{"text":"Rajput resistance was united enough to expel Babur.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the outcome because Babur defeated Rana Sanga and remained in India. Rajput resistance was serious, but its coalition was not united enough to defeat him."}]},{"id":"5cea88a1-bce9-4933-b856-2bd9aa3e4de0","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why was Babur’s rule in India still fragile?","back":"It depended on personal loyalty, military success and rewards.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It depended on personal loyalty, military success and rewards.","correct":true,"explanation":"Babur had not created deeply rooted institutions in India. His authority relied heavily on personal bonds, continued victories and distributing rewards to retain his followers’ support."},{"text":"It depended on hereditary bureaucracy, stable taxation and naval power.","correct":false,"explanation":"Babur had neither an established hereditary bureaucracy nor significant naval power supporting his Indian rule. Its fragility arose from dependence on personal loyalty, military success and rewards."},{"text":"It depended on religious uniformity, village elections and merchant support.","correct":false,"explanation":"These were not the foundations of Babur’s new regime. His authority remained insecure because followers were bound primarily through personal loyalty, battlefield success and material rewards."},{"text":"It depended on Rajput unity, Afghan support and peaceful succession.","correct":false,"explanation":"Babur faced Rajput and Afghan opposition rather than dependable support, and succession remained uncertain. His rule instead rested on personal loyalty, military victories and distributed rewards."}]},{"id":"8cea106a-c1b3-4025-b712-236ef81759ee","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did the Suri Dynasty help later Mughal consolidation?","back":"It developed more systematic administration for Akbar to build on.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It developed more systematic administration for Akbar to build on.","correct":true,"explanation":"Sher Shah and his successors improved revenue collection, communications and provincial government. These more systematic administrative practices provided useful foundations for Akbar’s later consolidation."},{"text":"It developed the mansabdari ranking system for Akbar to build on.","correct":false,"explanation":"The mansabdari system was developed under Akbar, not established by the Suri rulers. Their contribution was a more systematic administration, including improved revenue and communications arrangements."},{"text":"It developed a permanent naval administration for Akbar to build on.","correct":false,"explanation":"Naval administration was not the Suri Dynasty’s important legacy to Akbar. Its value lay in more systematic land revenue, communications and provincial administrative practices."},{"text":"It developed religious toleration through Din-i Ilahi for Akbar to build on.","correct":false,"explanation":"Din-i Ilahi was associated with Akbar’s own religious policies and was not a Suri innovation. The Suri legacy was the development of more systematic administration."}]},{"id":"f257f0f0-ffaf-4ed9-8d8e-1e55183c3503","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Humayun was defeated at [ ] in 1539 and [ ] in 1540.","back":"Humayun was defeated at Chausa in 1539 and Kanauj in 1540.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Humayun was defeated at Chausa in 1539 and Kanauj in 1540.","correct":true,"explanation":"Sher Shah defeated Humayun first at Chausa in 1539 and then decisively at Kanauj in 1540, forcing the Mughal emperor into exile."},{"text":"Humayun was defeated at Chunar in 1539 and Kanauj in 1540.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Humayun’s operations around the fortress of Chunar with his first major defeat. Sher Shah defeated him at Chausa in 1539 and Kanauj in 1540."},{"text":"Humayun was defeated at Chausa in 1539 and Panipat in 1540.","correct":false,"explanation":"The first location is correct, but Panipat was not the site of Humayun’s decisive 1540 defeat. After Chausa, Sher Shah defeated him at Kanauj."},{"text":"Humayun was defeated at Kanauj in 1539 and Chausa in 1540.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the sequence and dates of the two defeats. Chausa occurred in 1539, followed by the decisive defeat at Kanauj in 1540."}]},{"id":"d4d46668-7228-4917-9a95-7f7a2d666017","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What secured Akbar’s throne after his accession in 1556?","back":"Bairam Khan defeated Hemu at the Second Battle of Panipat.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Bairam Khan defeated Hemu at the Second Battle of Panipat.","correct":true,"explanation":"As Akbar’s regent, Bairam Khan directed the Mughal victory over Hemu at Panipat in 1556. This removed an immediate rival and secured Akbar’s throne."},{"text":"Bairam Khan defeated Sher Shah Suri at the Battle of Khanwa.","correct":false,"explanation":"This combines the wrong opponent and battle: Babur fought Rana Sanga at Khanwa, while Sher Shah defeated Humayun. Bairam Khan secured Akbar by defeating Hemu at Panipat."},{"text":"Akbar defeated Rana Sanga at the First Battle of Panipat.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Akbar with Babur and combines two separate battles. Bairam Khan secured the young Akbar’s throne by defeating Hemu at the Second Battle of Panipat."},{"text":"Humayun defeated Hemu at the Battle of Chausa.","correct":false,"explanation":"Humayun was defeated by Sher Shah at Chausa in 1539 and died before the 1556 battle. Bairam Khan defeated Hemu at the Second Battle of Panipat."}]},{"id":"249d3a76-0a18-488e-8cbe-95d259a8b4dd","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Akbar’s Rajput policy strengthen the empire?","back":"It turned former enemies into partners in the ruling elite.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It turned former enemies into partners in the ruling elite.","correct":true,"explanation":"Akbar formed alliances with Rajput rulers, admitted them to imperial service and often arranged marriage alliances, integrating powerful regional elites into Mughal government."},{"text":"It replaced Rajput chiefs with Persian provincial governors.","correct":false,"explanation":"Akbar did not systematically remove Rajput chiefs in favour of Persian governors. His policy strengthened the empire by making former Rajput enemies partners in the ruling elite."},{"text":"It allowed Rajput rulers to become independent military allies.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rajput rulers were incorporated into Mughal service rather than recognised as fully independent allies. Their inclusion as partners in the ruling elite tied them to Akbar’s authority."},{"text":"It excluded former enemies from positions in imperial government.","correct":false,"explanation":"Exclusion would have preserved Rajput hostility rather than strengthened Mughal rule. Akbar instead admitted former enemies as partners in the ruling elite, gaining their loyalty and service."}]},{"id":"67f9517a-4055-4f6f-ac2b-6330d043c2b6","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Akbar abolished the [ ] in [ ] as part of political inclusion.","back":"Akbar abolished the jizya in 1564 as part of political inclusion.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Akbar abolished the jizya in 1564 as part of political inclusion.","correct":true,"explanation":"The jizya was a tax imposed on non-Muslims. Akbar abolished it in 1564, reducing religious discrimination and encouraging Hindu subjects to identify with Mughal rule."},{"text":"Akbar abolished the jizya in 1563 as part of political inclusion.","correct":false,"explanation":"The year 1563 is commonly confused with Akbar’s abolition of the pilgrimage tax. He abolished the jizya one year later, in 1564."},{"text":"Akbar abolished the pilgrimage tax in 1564 as part of political inclusion.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the dates of two inclusion measures. Akbar abolished the pilgrimage tax in 1563, while the jizya was abolished in 1564."},{"text":"Akbar abolished the zakat in 1564 as part of political inclusion.","correct":false,"explanation":"Zakat is a charitable obligation within Islam, not the discriminatory tax removed in this measure. Akbar abolished the jizya in 1564 to promote political inclusion."}]},{"id":"dc9aeb9d-53ad-4ac9-939d-853464f59a0a","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did Akbar’s principle of sulh-i-kul promote?","back":"Universal peace across religious communities.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Universal peace across religious communities.","correct":true,"explanation":"Sulh-i-kul meant universal peace and encouraged tolerance among the empire’s different religious communities. It provided an inclusive principle for governing a diverse population."},{"text":"Sunni supremacy across religious communities.","correct":false,"explanation":"Sulh-i-kul did not establish Sunni dominance over other faiths. It promoted universal peace, allowing Akbar to govern different religious communities through tolerance and inclusion."},{"text":"Compulsory conversion across religious communities.","correct":false,"explanation":"Akbar’s principle rejected coercive religious uniformity rather than promoting conversion. Sulh-i-kul encouraged universal peace and accommodation among the empire’s varied religious communities."},{"text":"Religious segregation across religious communities.","correct":false,"explanation":"Segregation conflicts with Akbar’s effort to integrate diverse groups into imperial life. Sulh-i-kul instead promoted universal peace and tolerance across religious communities."}]},{"id":"aa6cdd5b-7aae-411c-967d-12307f7f8fdb","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did the mansabdari system help Akbar govern?","back":"It ranked nobles and controlled military service.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It ranked nobles and controlled military service.","correct":true,"explanation":"The mansabdari system assigned nobles numerical ranks that determined status, pay and military obligations. This enabled Akbar to organise service and maintain control over imperial officers."},{"text":"It elected nobles and controlled religious appointments.","correct":false,"explanation":"Mansabdars were appointed and ranked by the emperor, not elected, and the system primarily organised military service. It strengthened Akbar’s control over nobles and their obligations."},{"text":"It ranked peasants and controlled land ownership.","correct":false,"explanation":"The mansabdari system classified imperial nobles and officers, not peasants or landowners. Their ranks determined status and military service owed to the emperor."},{"text":"It freed nobles from compulsory military service.","correct":false,"explanation":"Mansab rank imposed military obligations rather than removing them. The system ranked nobles and specified the troops they had to maintain for imperial service."}]},{"id":"21bf8775-eac0-433f-99a4-e8b3610cb013","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"A [ ] was a revenue assignment, not [ ].","back":"A jagir was a revenue assignment, not ownership of land.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A jagir was a revenue assignment, not ownership of land.","correct":true,"explanation":"A jagir entitled its holder to collect revenue from an assigned area, usually temporarily. It did not give the holder permanent ownership of the land."},{"text":"A mansab was a revenue assignment, not ownership of land.","correct":false,"explanation":"A mansab was an official rank defining status, pay and service obligations, not a revenue assignment. A jagir assigned revenue without transferring ownership of land."},{"text":"A zamindar was a revenue assignment, not ownership of land.","correct":false,"explanation":"A zamindar was a local revenue collector or landed intermediary, not the assignment itself. The revenue assignment was called a jagir and did not confer land ownership."},{"text":"A jagir was a revenue assignment, not the right to collect revenue.","correct":false,"explanation":"This wrongly denies the central feature of a jagir: it granted rights to collect assigned revenue. However, those rights did not amount to ownership of the land."}]},{"id":"90e5350f-881e-4991-9f42-40468500d504","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Akbar’s zabt revenue system matter?","back":"It made land revenue more regular and assessable.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It made land revenue more regular and assessable.","correct":true,"explanation":"Zabt used measured land, crop yields and standardised rates to calculate taxation. This made Mughal revenue demands more predictable, regular and assessable."},{"text":"It made land revenue uniformly low and voluntary.","correct":false,"explanation":"Zabt did not make taxation voluntary or guarantee low demands. It strengthened state assessment by using land measurement and standard rates to make revenue more regular."},{"text":"It made land revenue payable only in kind.","correct":false,"explanation":"Zabt commonly converted expected crop shares into cash assessments rather than requiring payment only in produce. Its importance lay in making revenue more regular and assessable."},{"text":"It made land revenue dependent on noble rank.","correct":false,"explanation":"Noble rank was governed through the mansabdari system, not used as the basis for assessing land revenue. Zabt made taxation more regular through measurement and standard rates."}]},{"id":"a30bff41-0321-449f-966b-b0fb08a16744","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why was Mughal court ceremonial politically important under Jahangir and Shah Jahan?","back":"It communicated hierarchy and obedience.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It communicated hierarchy and obedience.","correct":true,"explanation":"Elaborate audiences, rituals and controlled access displayed the emperor’s elevated position. Court ceremonial taught nobles their rank and publicly reinforced hierarchy and obedience."},{"text":"It communicated equality and consultation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Mughal ceremonial emphasised unequal rank and submission rather than political equality. Its carefully ordered rituals communicated imperial hierarchy and expected obedience to the emperor."},{"text":"It communicated informality and social equality.","correct":false,"explanation":"The courts of Jahangir and Shah Jahan were highly formal and status-conscious. Their ceremonies displayed distinctions of rank and reinforced hierarchy and obedience."},{"text":"It communicated provincial autonomy and independence.","correct":false,"explanation":"Court ritual centred authority on the emperor rather than encouraging provincial independence. It presented nobles as ranked servants whose status depended on obedience to the imperial court."}]},{"id":"79ddf077-85cc-4479-99a2-7c047a3298cd","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The [ ], begun in 1632, expressed dynastic memory and imperial wealth.","back":"The Taj Mahal, begun in 1632, expressed dynastic memory and imperial wealth.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Taj Mahal","correct":true,"explanation":"Shah Jahan began the Taj Mahal in 1632 as a mausoleum for Mumtaz Mahal. Its scale and decoration expressed dynastic remembrance and Mughal imperial wealth."},{"text":"Red Fort","correct":false,"explanation":"The Red Fort was begun later, in 1638, as the palace-fortress of Shahjahanabad. The monument begun in 1632 to express dynastic memory was the Taj Mahal."},{"text":"Humayun’s Tomb","correct":false,"explanation":"Humayun’s Tomb was commissioned in the sixteenth century by Humayun’s widow, long before 1632. The description refers to Shah Jahan’s Taj Mahal."},{"text":"Jama Masjid","correct":false,"explanation":"The Jama Masjid of Delhi was begun in 1650 and served as a congregational mosque. The dynastic memorial begun in 1632 was the Taj Mahal."}]},{"id":"de1cdf20-3634-4e4f-a003-d040aebdc6a2","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why was the Deccan difficult for the Mughals to control?","back":"Local sultanates and warrior groups were resilient.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Local sultanates and warrior groups were resilient.","correct":true,"explanation":"Deccan sultanates and mobile warrior groups, particularly the Marathas, resisted Mughal authority effectively. Their local support and military adaptability made conquest and lasting control difficult."},{"text":"Portuguese enclaves and naval forces were resilient.","correct":false,"explanation":"Portuguese power was concentrated in a few coastal enclaves and was not the main obstacle to Mughal control. Resilient local sultanates and warrior groups sustained resistance across the Deccan."},{"text":"Imperial governors and tax collectors were resilient.","correct":false,"explanation":"Governors and tax collectors represented Mughal authority rather than resistance to it. Control was difficult because local sultanates and warrior groups repeatedly resisted imperial conquest and administration."},{"text":"Rajput kingdoms and Sikh communities were resilient.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rajput kingdoms and Sikh communities challenged Mughal power mainly in northern India, not the Deccan. There, resilient local sultanates and warrior groups were the principal obstacle."}]},{"id":"431414fe-5993-46d2-a376-6e1250af29b5","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Mughal succession crises repeatedly weaken the empire?","back":"No secure primogeniture turned succession into civil war.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"No secure primogeniture turned succession into civil war.","correct":true,"explanation":"Mughal emperors had no binding rule that the eldest son inherited. Rival princes therefore competed militarily for the throne, repeatedly producing destructive civil wars."},{"text":"Rigid primogeniture turned succession into civil war.","correct":false,"explanation":"The problem was the absence, not the rigidity, of primogeniture. Without an accepted eldest-son succession rule, imperial princes fought one another to secure the throne."},{"text":"No secure regency system turned succession into civil war.","correct":false,"explanation":"Regency arrangements concern government for an underage or incapacitated ruler and were not the central problem. The absence of secure primogeniture encouraged rival sons to wage civil war."},{"text":"No secure imperial bureaucracy turned succession into civil war.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Mughals possessed an extensive imperial bureaucracy, although it sometimes fragmented during crises. Succession wars arose primarily because no secure rule of primogeniture determined the next emperor."}]},{"id":"41a42f64-2ea7-4db1-986f-718417edd388","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Aurangzeb reimposed the [ ] in [ ].","back":"Aurangzeb reimposed the jizya in 1679.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Aurangzeb reimposed the jizya in 1679.","correct":true,"explanation":"Aurangzeb restored the jizya, a tax imposed on non-Muslims under Islamic law, in 1679. Its restoration became an important symbol of his more orthodox religious policies."},{"text":"Aurangzeb reimposed the jizya in 1658.","correct":false,"explanation":"The year 1658 marks Aurangzeb’s seizure of power, which makes it a tempting confusion. He did not reimpose the jizya until 1679."},{"text":"Aurangzeb reimposed the zakat in 1679.","correct":false,"explanation":"Zakat is an obligation associated with Muslim charitable giving, not the tax Aurangzeb restored on non-Muslims. The measure reimposed in 1679 was the jizya."},{"text":"Aurangzeb reimposed the pilgrimage tax in 1669.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Aurangzeb’s wider religious measures with the best-known taxation change. He reimposed the jizya on non-Muslims in 1679."}]},{"id":"808d6ec1-e679-48e2-8251-c8832696b382","cardType":"basic","points":3,"front":"Why did Aurangzeb’s Deccan conquests create overextension?","back":"They added hostile territory, costly armies and difficult terrain.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They added hostile territory, costly armies and difficult terrain.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Deccan campaigns expanded Mughal commitments into resistant regions where large armies had to operate over difficult terrain. The resulting financial and military burden overstretched imperial resources."},{"text":"They added loyal territory, cheaper armies and accessible terrain.","correct":false,"explanation":"These conditions would have eased imperial administration rather than caused overextension. The conquests added hostile territory, required costly armies and forced Mughal forces to operate across difficult terrain."},{"text":"They added rich ports, powerful fleets and overseas colonies.","correct":false,"explanation":"Aurangzeb’s campaigns were land-based conquests within the Deccan, not overseas naval expansion. Overextension resulted from hostile territory, costly armies and difficult terrain."},{"text":"They added Rajput allies, stable taxes and peaceful frontiers.","correct":false,"explanation":"Allies, reliable revenue and peaceful frontiers would have strengthened Mughal rule. Instead, the Deccan conquests created burdens through hostile territory, costly armies and difficult terrain."}]},{"id":"b9420c4e-c72f-4469-9e02-10c787d62d9d","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What was the jagirdari crisis?","back":"Too many nobles expected jagirs, while revenue collection was unreliable.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Too many nobles expected jagirs, while revenue collection was unreliable.","correct":true,"explanation":"The number of mansabdars seeking jagirs grew faster than the supply of productive assignments. Unreliable revenue collection meant that many jagirs failed to provide their expected income."},{"text":"Too few nobles expected jagirs, while revenue collection was reliable.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses both parts of the crisis. Too many nobles competed for jagirs, and unreliable revenue collection reduced their real value and intensified competition."},{"text":"Too many peasants expected jagirs, while military recruitment was unreliable.","correct":false,"explanation":"Jagirs were revenue assignments granted to nobles and officials, not to peasants. The crisis arose because too many nobles expected jagirs while revenue collection remained unreliable."},{"text":"Too many nobles expected mansabs, while coin production was unreliable.","correct":false,"explanation":"Mansabs were official ranks, whereas the jagirdari crisis concerned shortages and declining returns from jagir assignments. Too many nobles sought jagirs while revenue collection proved unreliable."}]},{"id":"93888bdc-b431-43f9-8d0d-f9acdd8536c7","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What did Nadir Shah’s victory at Karnal, 1739, expose?","back":"Mughal commanders’ failure to coordinate effectively.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Mughal commanders’ failure to coordinate effectively.","correct":true,"explanation":"At Karnal, Mughal commanders acted without a coherent plan and failed to combine their much larger forces effectively. Nadir Shah exploited this disunity to win decisively."},{"text":"Mughal commanders’ lack of firearms and artillery.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Mughal army possessed firearms and artillery, so simple technological absence did not explain the defeat. Karnal instead exposed the commanders’ failure to coordinate their forces effectively."},{"text":"Mughal commanders’ refusal to recruit cavalry forces.","correct":false,"explanation":"Cavalry remained an important component of the Mughal army and was present at Karnal. The decisive weakness was poor coordination between commanders rather than refusal to recruit cavalry."},{"text":"Mughal commanders’ dependence on European naval support.","correct":false,"explanation":"Karnal was an inland land battle, so European naval support was irrelevant. The defeat exposed the Mughal commanders’ inability to coordinate their forces effectively against Nadir Shah."}]}]}],"examCountdown":{"examDate":"2027-05-19","paperLabel":"Paper 1"},"heading":"The Rise and Decline of the Mughal Empire in India 1526–1739","title":"The Rise and Decline of the Mughal Empire in India 1526–1739 Flashcards","topbar":{"backHref":"/a-level/history/ocr/flashcards"},"topicSidebar":"$L39"}]}],"topicId":"790492e1-df9a-511f-a283-a37ec40e90eb","walled":"$L3a"}],"$L3b","$L3c"]