33:I[196793,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"Gingerbread"] 35:I[647935,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"RecordResourceResume"] 36:I[830476,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"FlashcardAccessBranch"] 37:I[315438,["/_next/static/chunks/1xyh1u_ku6jw-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1o4x0l2qh0ta-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791882788"],"TopicFlashcardRunner"] 24:[["$","$L33",null,{"feature":"flashcards"}],"$L34",["$","$L35",null,{"href":"/a-level/history/ocr/england-1199-1272/flashcards","label":"England 1199–1272","subjectCode":"a_level_history__ocr","surface":"flashcards"}],["$","$L36",null,{"runner":["$","div",null,{"className":"min-h-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden bg-background","children":["$","$L37",null,{"decks":[{"id":"ee0f7d25-7b68-437b-8589-5d1e1502fc06","title":"England 1199–1272 Flashcards","topicId":"5be7b146-ee27-5c57-8d52-785de3a40eed","topicSlug":"england-1199-1272","cards":[{"id":"d31565d4-109c-48ba-b638-7208169080f8","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"John’s rival claimant in 1199 was [ ], whose claim appealed to some nobles in Anjou and Brittany.","back":"John’s rival claimant in 1199 was Arthur of Brittany, whose claim appealed to some nobles in Anjou and Brittany.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Arthur of Brittany","correct":true,"explanation":"Arthur, the son of John’s elder brother Geoffrey, had a strong hereditary claim and received support from nobles in Brittany and Anjou after Richard I’s death."},{"text":"Geoffrey of Brittany","correct":false,"explanation":"Geoffrey was Arthur’s father and had died in 1186, so he could not contest the succession in 1199. The rival claimant was Geoffrey’s son, Arthur of Brittany."},{"text":"Philip II of France","correct":false,"explanation":"Philip supported Arthur’s challenge and exploited the succession dispute, but he was not himself the rival claimant. John’s dynastic rival was Arthur of Brittany."},{"text":"Otto of Brunswick","correct":false,"explanation":"Otto was John’s nephew and an ally within the German Empire, not a claimant to Richard I’s lands. The rival claimant in 1199 was Arthur of Brittany."}]},{"id":"a2c3aaae-2642-446a-8a0e-8abb01ecf27d","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did John accept about his French lands in the Treaty of Le Goulet 1200?","back":"He accepted Philip II as overlord.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"He accepted Philip II as overlord.","correct":true,"explanation":"John acknowledged Philip II as his feudal overlord for his continental possessions, gaining Philip’s recognition of his succession to most of the Angevin lands."},{"text":"He accepted Arthur as overlord.","correct":false,"explanation":"Arthur was John’s dynastic rival, not the recognised overlord of his French territories. John accepted Philip II as feudal overlord under the treaty."},{"text":"He accepted himself as Philip II’s overlord.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the feudal relationship established by the treaty. John held his French lands as Philip II’s vassal and therefore accepted Philip as overlord."},{"text":"He accepted Philip II as overlord of England.","correct":false,"explanation":"The treaty concerned John’s status in France and did not give Philip authority over England. John accepted Philip II as overlord of his French possessions."}]},{"id":"2156b642-5843-4473-a30c-fa078beb50c7","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did John’s marriage to Isabelle of Angoulême weaken support in Poitou?","back":"It offended Hugh de Lusignan, pushing nobles towards Philip II.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It offended Hugh de Lusignan, pushing nobles towards Philip II.","correct":true,"explanation":"Isabelle had been promised to Hugh de Lusignan, so John’s marriage humiliated the Lusignan family and encouraged dissatisfied Poitevin nobles to appeal to Philip II."},{"text":"It offended William Marshal, pushing nobles towards Philip II.","correct":false,"explanation":"William Marshal was an English magnate rather than the Poitevin lord directly injured by the marriage. John offended Hugh de Lusignan, prompting opposition and appeals to Philip II."},{"text":"It strengthened Hugh de Lusignan, drawing nobles away from Philip II.","correct":false,"explanation":"The marriage did not strengthen Hugh; it humiliated him because Isabelle had been promised to his family. This offence drove the Lusignans and other nobles towards Philip II."},{"text":"It offended Arthur of Brittany, pushing nobles towards John.","correct":false,"explanation":"Arthur’s dispute with John concerned the succession rather than Isabelle’s marriage. The marriage offended Hugh de Lusignan and encouraged Poitevin nobles to seek Philip II’s support."}]},{"id":"3334493d-89ea-4bdd-9bac-0c0f9f2d7b8c","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did the fall of Château Gaillard matter for Normandy?","back":"It opened the route into Normandy.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It opened the route into Normandy.","correct":true,"explanation":"Château Gaillard guarded the Seine approach to Rouen. Its capture removed a major defensive barrier and allowed Philip II’s forces to advance into Normandy."},{"text":"It opened the route into Brittany.","correct":false,"explanation":"The fortress protected the approach to Normandy rather than securing an invasion route into Brittany. Its fall enabled Philip II to advance deeper into Normandy."},{"text":"It blocked the route into Normandy.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the military consequence of the siege. Losing the fortress removed Normandy’s main defensive obstacle and opened the route for Philip II’s invasion."},{"text":"It opened the route into England.","correct":false,"explanation":"Château Gaillard was a Norman fortress controlling the Seine, not a gateway to England. Its capture opened the route into Normandy and towards Rouen."}]},{"id":"255cabfe-dd38-465d-84b7-d095b50075fb","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Normandy was lost in [ ], damaging John’s prestige and finances.","back":"Normandy was lost in 1204, damaging John’s prestige and finances.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"1204","correct":true,"explanation":"Philip II completed the conquest of Normandy in 1204, depriving John of a central part of the Angevin inheritance and substantially reducing his continental revenues."},{"text":"1202","correct":false,"explanation":"In 1202 John was summoned before Philip II’s court and war intensified, but Normandy had not yet fallen. Its conquest was completed in 1204."},{"text":"1203","correct":false,"explanation":"Château Gaillard remained under siege during 1203, so Normandy had not yet been fully conquered. Philip II completed its takeover in 1204."},{"text":"1214","correct":false,"explanation":"The year 1214 is associated with John’s failed campaign and the Battle of Bouvines, not Normandy’s loss. Normandy had fallen a decade earlier, in 1204."}]},{"id":"bef681a8-9fb1-475f-aeba-923850b814b5","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What financial pressure did losing Normandy create for John?","back":"He became more desperate for money.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"He became more desperate for money.","correct":true,"explanation":"Normandy had supplied John with land, revenues and political resources. Its loss therefore intensified his need to raise money for government and attempted reconquest."},{"text":"He became less dependent on taxation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Losing Norman income increased rather than reduced John’s reliance on taxation. He became more desperate for money to fund administration and campaigns to recover his lands."},{"text":"He became more willing to reduce scutage.","correct":false,"explanation":"John’s financial pressures encouraged heavier and more frequent scutage demands, not reductions. Losing Normandy made him more desperate to obtain money from his English subjects."},{"text":"He became financially independent of barons.","correct":false,"explanation":"The loss removed a major source of continental revenue and therefore weakened John’s financial position. He became more desperate for money and increasingly exploited royal rights."}]},{"id":"d8710561-9516-4fcf-88e2-1a2246cf6963","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did Bouvines 1214 affect baronial attitudes to taxation?","back":"It made years of taxation look pointless.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It made years of taxation look pointless.","correct":true,"explanation":"John’s defeat meant that the heavy taxation used to finance continental campaigns had produced no lasting recovery, intensifying baronial resentment towards his financial demands."},{"text":"It made years of taxation seem justified.","correct":false,"explanation":"Bouvines ended in defeat for John’s coalition, so taxation had not delivered the promised continental recovery. The failure made years of financial demands appear pointless."},{"text":"It made the French campaign look successful.","correct":false,"explanation":"The battle destroyed John’s hopes of recovering his French territories and was therefore a major failure. It made the taxation used to finance his campaigns look pointless."},{"text":"It made barons willing to fund another campaign.","correct":false,"explanation":"Defeat increased opposition to John rather than enthusiasm for another expensive war. Baronial taxpayers concluded that years of financial sacrifice had achieved little or nothing."}]},{"id":"d0c3dc6f-2972-471b-8f43-5fefef0ad7aa","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did John’s use of feudal rights alienate barons?","back":"Custom seemed turned into financial exploitation.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Custom seemed turned into financial exploitation.","correct":true,"explanation":"John maximised payments from reliefs, wardships, marriages and other feudal incidents. Barons believed he was manipulating established customs primarily to extract money from them."},{"text":"Custom seemed protected from royal interference.","correct":false,"explanation":"John intervened aggressively in feudal customs rather than shielding them from royal power. His excessive monetary demands made those customs appear to be instruments of financial exploitation."},{"text":"Custom seemed turned into military reform.","correct":false,"explanation":"John’s manipulation of reliefs, wardships and marriages aimed to raise revenue, not reorganise military service. Barons therefore saw customary rights becoming tools of financial exploitation."},{"text":"Custom seemed turned into judicial independence.","correct":false,"explanation":"John’s use of feudal rights increased royal pressure and control rather than promoting independent justice. Barons objected because custom had become a means of financial exploitation."}]},{"id":"fefecbd2-5c2e-4d98-bdeb-07f379bc47e4","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Magna Carta 1215 was mainly a [ ], not a democratic constitution.","back":"Magna Carta 1215 was mainly a baronial peace settlement, not a democratic constitution.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"baronial peace settlement","correct":true,"explanation":"Magna Carta was primarily an agreement intended to end conflict between King John and his barons. It limited royal abuses and restored peace, rather than creating a democratic system of government."},{"text":"democratic representative constitution","correct":false,"explanation":"This wrongly projects modern democracy onto a medieval document. Magna Carta mainly settled disputes between John and the barons; it did not establish representative government or universal political participation."},{"text":"papal constitutional settlement","correct":false,"explanation":"Although the papacy influenced the crisis, Magna Carta was not chiefly a papal constitution. Its immediate purpose was to settle grievances between King John and his barons."},{"text":"royal succession agreement","correct":false,"explanation":"The charter did not primarily regulate the succession to the English throne. It was a peace settlement addressing baronial grievances and restrictions on the king’s exercise of power."}]},{"id":"12e36d8f-8e1c-4a38-9542-723cd1b31cab","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did Magna Carta’s security clause set up?","back":"A group of 25 barons to enforce the agreement.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A group of 25 barons to enforce the agreement.","correct":true,"explanation":"The security clause established 25 barons who could monitor the king’s compliance and seize royal property if he breached the charter. This gave the agreement a mechanism for enforcement."},{"text":"A group of 12 bishops to supervise the agreement.","correct":false,"explanation":"The security clause did not place enforcement in the hands of bishops. It created 25 barons, reflecting the barons’ determination to monitor and restrain King John directly."},{"text":"A group of 40 knights to enforce the agreement.","correct":false,"explanation":"The number and group are mistaken: the clause specified 25 barons, not 40 knights. The body was intended to enforce the agreement against royal violations."},{"text":"A group of 13 earls to approve new taxes.","correct":false,"explanation":"The clause did not create 13 earls to approve taxation. It established 25 barons with powers to enforce the charter if John failed to observe its terms."}]},{"id":"46925fbf-d3fe-4df5-9466-98184c5eb672","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"After John rejected Magna Carta, what papal action helped restart war?","back":"Innocent III annulled Magna Carta.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Innocent III annulled Magna Carta.","correct":true,"explanation":"Pope Innocent III declared Magna Carta invalid because John had accepted it under coercion and because it infringed the rights of a papal vassal. This helped renew armed conflict."},{"text":"Innocent III confirmed Magna Carta.","correct":false,"explanation":"The pope did not confirm the charter. He annulled it, arguing that John had been forced to accept it and that its terms were incompatible with his papal vassalage."},{"text":"Innocent III excommunicated the rebel barons.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although the pope supported John, the key action was annulling Magna Carta rather than excommunicating the barons. The annulment removed the settlement that had temporarily ended the dispute."},{"text":"Innocent III reissued Magna Carta.","correct":false,"explanation":"The pope did not reissue Magna Carta. He annulled it as a coerced agreement, allowing John to reject its terms and contributing to the resumption of war."}]},{"id":"ddc553cd-9593-4bc0-9ed3-49e531dc91df","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did the Interdict damage John’s kingship?","back":"Kingship depended on religious legitimacy.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Kingship depended on religious legitimacy.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Interdict suspended religious services across England, making John’s rule appear opposed by the Church. Medieval kingship relied heavily on religious approval, so this weakened his authority and reputation."},{"text":"Kingship depended on parliamentary elections.","correct":false,"explanation":"England did not depend on parliamentary elections to legitimise medieval kingship. The Interdict damaged John because religious approval and the Church’s support were central to royal authority."},{"text":"Kingship depended on merchant taxation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Taxation could support royal government but did not provide its fundamental legitimacy. The Interdict was damaging because it undermined the religious basis of John’s kingship."},{"text":"Kingship depended on baronial military service.","correct":false,"explanation":"Baronial service was important to warfare, but it was not the main source of a king’s legitimacy. The Interdict threatened John’s religious standing and therefore his authority."}]},{"id":"f4edca3c-3e2a-4944-b5c4-a93de19b40c9","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"In 1213 John made England a [ ], holding it under papal overlordship.","back":"In 1213 John made England a papal fief, holding it under papal overlordship.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"papal fief","correct":true,"explanation":"In 1213 John submitted England to Pope Innocent III as a papal fief. He became the pope’s vassal and agreed to hold the kingdom under papal overlordship."},{"text":"royal demesne","correct":false,"explanation":"A royal demesne was land controlled directly by the crown, not a kingdom held under papal overlordship. John’s 1213 submission made England a papal fief."},{"text":"baronial commune","correct":false,"explanation":"A baronial commune would suggest collective baronial government, which was not created in 1213. John instead submitted England to the pope as a papal fief."},{"text":"papal protectorate","correct":false,"explanation":"The precise feudal arrangement was a papal fief, not a protectorate. John remained king but held England from the pope as his feudal overlord."}]},{"id":"71e36db4-cf24-4928-be50-611ea1d44ce2","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did John’s papal submission help him in 1215?","back":"Innocent III quashed Magna Carta as forced on a papal vassal.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Innocent III quashed Magna Carta as forced on a papal vassal.","correct":true,"explanation":"John’s papal submission gave Innocent III a reason to intervene as his overlord. The pope quashed Magna Carta, arguing that it had been forced on John and threatened his rights."},{"text":"Innocent III ratified Magna Carta as binding on a papal vassal.","correct":false,"explanation":"The pope did not ratify the charter. He quashed it because John had accepted it under pressure and because its terms were considered damaging to a papal vassal."},{"text":"Innocent III transferred Magna Carta to the French king’s authority.","correct":false,"explanation":"The pope did not transfer the charter to France. He rejected it as a coerced agreement imposed on John, whose status as a papal vassal strengthened the pope’s intervention."},{"text":"Innocent III expanded Magna Carta to protect papal taxation.","correct":false,"explanation":"The pope did not expand Magna Carta or use it to protect taxation. He quashed it, claiming that coercion by the barons made the agreement invalid."}]},{"id":"54de3f5f-7afd-43fb-b0bf-388332281d2f","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did reissuing Magna Carta help Henry III’s minority government?","back":"It won moderate barons away from Prince Louis.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It won moderate barons away from Prince Louis.","correct":true,"explanation":"Reissuing Magna Carta reassured barons who wanted reform but did not necessarily support French rule. This helped the minority government separate moderate opponents from Prince Louis’s cause."},{"text":"It won radical barons over to Prince Louis.","correct":false,"explanation":"Reissuing the charter was intended to draw moderate barons away from Louis, not strengthen his support among radical barons. It offered concessions while preserving Henry III’s kingship."},{"text":"It removed moderate barons from royal government.","correct":false,"explanation":"The reissue did not exclude moderate barons from government. By confirming concessions, it encouraged them to abandon Louis and support Henry III’s minority regime."},{"text":"It won French nobles away from Prince Louis.","correct":false,"explanation":"The policy targeted English barons, particularly moderates dissatisfied with Louis’s invasion. It was not designed to detach French nobles from Louis’s support."}]},{"id":"6df065d7-43b0-497a-8393-480fa59affde","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Henry III’s marriage to Eleanor of Provence create patronage tensions?","back":"Her Savoyard relatives benefited from royal patronage.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Her Savoyard relatives benefited from royal patronage.","correct":true,"explanation":"Eleanor of Provence brought Savoyard relatives and associates to England, and several received offices, lands, and influence. Their advancement created resentment among English nobles competing for patronage."},{"text":"Her French relatives benefited from royal patronage.","correct":false,"explanation":"The tension centred particularly on Eleanor’s Savoyard relatives, not simply French relatives. Their access to offices and rewards caused resentment among established English nobles."},{"text":"Her English relatives benefited from royal patronage.","correct":false,"explanation":"Eleanor’s relatives were not mainly English. Her Savoyard connections benefited from royal patronage, provoking opposition from nobles who viewed them as foreign favourites."},{"text":"Her papal relatives benefited from royal patronage.","correct":false,"explanation":"The dispute was not about papal relatives. Eleanor’s Savoyard family and associates gained royal favour, creating patronage tensions with English barons and officials."}]},{"id":"50c8987c-d508-4a01-afb4-bdb530c2a0b6","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why was the Sicilian affair especially damaging for Henry III?","back":"It created huge financial obligations without a realistic payment plan.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It created huge financial obligations without a realistic payment plan.","correct":true,"explanation":"The papacy expected Henry to finance the conquest of Sicily, but he lacked sufficient revenue and no workable means of payment had been established."},{"text":"It provided limited financial benefits without a reliable source of income.","correct":false,"explanation":"The affair did not provide Henry with a reliable new source of income. The papal agreement instead imposed huge financial obligations without any realistic payment plan."},{"text":"It created huge territorial commitments without a realistic conquest plan.","correct":false,"explanation":"Henry did not receive extensive Sicilian lands through the agreement because the proposed conquest never occurred. Its damage came from enormous financial obligations that he could not realistically meet."},{"text":"It created major political obligations without a realistic succession plan.","correct":false,"explanation":"The central problem was not the immediate loss of royal estates. Henry accepted enormous debts and papal financial demands without establishing a realistic way to pay them."}]},{"id":"df2cd22b-06c3-42e6-a7d3-71587f1e6bab","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"In 1258, financial crisis and famine coincided with anger over the [ ].","back":"In 1258, financial crisis and famine coincided with anger over the Sicilian affair.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Sicilian affair","correct":true,"explanation":"Henry III had accepted the Sicilian crown for his son Edmund and incurred enormous papal debts, making the Sicilian affair a major focus of baronial anger."},{"text":"loss of Normandy","correct":false,"explanation":"The loss of Normandy occurred under King John decades earlier, not during the crisis of 1258. Contemporary anger focused particularly on Henry III’s costly Sicilian affair."},{"text":"Welsh campaigns","correct":false,"explanation":"The Welsh campaigns burdened Henry’s government, but the specific foreign policy scandal intensifying the 1258 crisis was the costly and unsuccessful Sicilian affair."},{"text":"Poitevin rebellion","correct":false,"explanation":"The Poitevin rebellion belongs to the earlier reign of King John and was not the issue driving reform in 1258. Baronial anger centred on the Sicilian affair."}]},{"id":"0ba07bef-fdea-4196-afeb-3c4a50d4706f","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did the Provisions of Oxford create to supervise government?","back":"A council of 15.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A council of 15.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Provisions established a council of 15 to advise the king and supervise central government, placing royal decision-making under sustained baronial oversight."},{"text":"A council of 24.","correct":false,"explanation":"A committee of 24 was involved in drawing up the reform programme, which makes this figure tempting. The permanent supervisory body created was a council of 15."},{"text":"A council of 12.","correct":false,"explanation":"Twelve representatives were selected by each side for the initial reform process, but the body established to supervise government was a council of 15."},{"text":"A council of 9.","correct":false,"explanation":"Nine was not the membership fixed by the Provisions for supervising royal government. The reform settlement entrusted that responsibility to a council of 15."}]},{"id":"5536533d-9ec0-464e-8f7f-79ebdbe071ac","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What regular institution did the Provisions of Oxford require?","back":"Regular parliaments.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Regular parliaments.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Provisions required parliaments to meet regularly, traditionally understood as three times each year, allowing the political community to scrutinise government more consistently."},{"text":"Regular county courts.","correct":false,"explanation":"County courts already met as local judicial institutions and were not the regular central body required by the Provisions. The reform programme required regular parliaments."},{"text":"Regular royal assizes.","correct":false,"explanation":"Royal assizes concerned the administration of justice rather than routine political supervision of government. The Provisions instead required parliaments to assemble regularly."},{"text":"Regular church councils.","correct":false,"explanation":"Church councils dealt primarily with ecclesiastical affairs and were not the institution specified by the reformers. The Provisions required the regular meeting of parliaments."}]},{"id":"9d72119a-8e23-4eb9-be51-c0374a0da1d5","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What did Henry’s 1261 papal dispensation reveal about reform?","back":"Reform depended on political force, not written rules.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Reform depended on political force, not written rules.","correct":true,"explanation":"Henry used papal authority to free himself from his oath to observe the Provisions, demonstrating that written constitutional rules survived only when backed by sufficient political power."},{"text":"Reform depended on papal approval, not baronial support.","correct":false,"explanation":"The dispensation weakened reform rather than showing that it relied on papal support. It revealed that written rules were ineffective unless reformers possessed sufficient political force."},{"text":"Reform depended on royal consent, not political pressure.","correct":false,"explanation":"Henry’s repudiation showed that his formal consent could be withdrawn with papal assistance. Reform therefore depended on political force rather than the permanence of royal promises."},{"text":"Reform depended on legal precedent, not written rules.","correct":false,"explanation":"The crisis was not primarily about judicial precedent. Henry’s ability to overturn the settlement showed that reform required political force to uphold its written provisions."}]},{"id":"d98e056d-19c3-4d38-9e9e-17444dd0dd2e","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"At Lewes 1264, what happened to Henry and Edward?","back":"They were captured by Montfort.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They were captured by Montfort.","correct":true,"explanation":"Montfort’s victory at Lewes placed both Henry III and his son Edward in captivity, allowing Montfort to dominate the royal government after the battle."},{"text":"They were driven into exile.","correct":false,"explanation":"Neither Henry nor Edward escaped immediately after Lewes. Both were taken captive following Montfort’s victory, although Edward later escaped in May 1265."},{"text":"They were victorious over Montfort.","correct":false,"explanation":"Henry and Edward did not defeat Montfort at Lewes; the royalist army lost the battle. Both men were subsequently captured by Montfort’s forces."},{"text":"They were replaced as rulers.","correct":false,"explanation":"Henry remained king after Lewes and Edward was not crowned. Instead, Montfort captured both men and exercised power while controlling the royal family."}]},{"id":"9ff8811d-72e6-455a-979f-897dc2ff75ca","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Montfort’s January 1265 Parliament summoned [ ] as well as knights, magnates and clergy.","back":"Montfort’s January 1265 Parliament summoned burgesses as well as knights, magnates and clergy.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"burgesses","correct":true,"explanation":"Montfort summoned burgesses from selected boroughs, extending representation beyond magnates, clergy and county knights and making the 1265 Parliament an important constitutional precedent."},{"text":"sheriffs","correct":false,"explanation":"Sheriffs were royal local officials, not the distinctive additional representatives summoned in January 1265. Montfort invited burgesses to represent selected boroughs."},{"text":"judges","correct":false,"explanation":"Judges served the royal legal system but were not the notable new representative group in this Parliament. Montfort summoned burgesses alongside knights, magnates and clergy."},{"text":"villeins","correct":false,"explanation":"Villeins were unfree peasants and were not summoned as parliamentary representatives. The significant addition in January 1265 was burgesses chosen from selected boroughs."}]},{"id":"96b17fa4-474e-4e0f-817c-6ed0a6142901","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What battle ended Montfort’s dominance in August 1265?","back":"The Battle of Evesham.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Battle of Evesham.","correct":true,"explanation":"Royalist forces led by Lord Edward defeated and killed Simon de Montfort at Evesham in August 1265, decisively ending Montfort’s control of government."},{"text":"The Battle of Lewes.","correct":false,"explanation":"Lewes in 1264 established Montfort’s dominance by bringing Henry and Edward into captivity. His dominance ended with his defeat and death at Evesham in 1265."},{"text":"The Battle of Northampton.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Battle of Northampton in 1264 was a royalist victory over rebel forces but did not end Montfort’s later dominance. That occurred at Evesham in August 1265."},{"text":"The Battle of Kenilworth.","correct":false,"explanation":"The siege of Kenilworth occurred after Montfort’s death and involved continued rebel resistance. Montfort’s own dominance had already ended at Evesham in August 1265."}]},{"id":"621c6ab0-c590-4764-afb3-b32f101eb23e","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did the Dictum of Kenilworth 1266 aid reconstruction?","back":"Rebels could recover lands by paying fines.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Rebels could recover lands by paying fines.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Dictum allowed disinherited rebels to buy back their confiscated estates by paying fines, helping restore the landed order and reconcile former opponents to royal government."},{"text":"Rebels could recover lands without paying fines.","correct":false,"explanation":"The rebels’ estates were not restored unconditionally, as financial penalties remained central to the settlement. The Dictum aided reconstruction by allowing rebels to recover lands through paying fines."},{"text":"Royalists could retain all confiscated rebel lands.","correct":false,"explanation":"Permanent confiscation would have prolonged resentment rather than promoted reconciliation. The Dictum instead enabled rebels to recover their former lands after paying fines to the Crown."},{"text":"Rebels could recover lands through military service.","correct":false,"explanation":"Military service was not the mechanism established for recovering confiscated estates. The Dictum allowed former rebels to regain their lands by paying assessed financial penalties."}]}]}],"examCountdown":{"examDate":"2027-05-19","paperLabel":"Paper 1"},"heading":"England 1199–1272","title":"England 1199–1272 Flashcards","topbar":{"backHref":"/a-level/history/ocr/flashcards"},"topicSidebar":"$L38"}]}],"topicId":"5be7b146-ee27-5c57-8d52-785de3a40eed","walled":"$L39"}],"$L3a","$L3b"]