Skip to content

Course home

1.6.2 nature and definition of public goods

1.6.2 nature and definition of public goods

Public Goods

Definition

Public good: a good that is both non-rival and non-excludable in consumption, giving rise to the free-rider problem and non-provision by the market, for example national defence or street lighting.

  1. Non-rivalry means one person's consumption does not reduce the amount left for others.
  2. Non-excludability means people cannot be prevented from consuming it, even if they do not pay.
Key Idea
  • Because non-payers cannot be excluded, they can free-ride by consuming without paying.
  • With everyone free-riding, a profit-seeking firm cannot cover its costs.
    • The result is non-provision by the market: a missing market.

The Free-Rider Chain

  1. Because the good is non-excludable, a firm cannot stop non-payers from consuming it.
  2. Because it is non-rival, an extra user adds nothing to cost, so charging that user is hard to justify.
  3. Each consumer reasons that others will pay and so waits to consume for free.
  4. When everyone reasons this way, no revenue is raised.
  5. With no revenue on offer, no private firm supplies the good, so the market provides none of it, the classic case of market failure that justifies state provision.
Example
  • Consider national defence protecting a country from attack.
    • Protecting one more resident costs nothing extra, so it is non-rival.
  • No resident can be left unprotected, so defence is non-excludable.
  • A firm selling defence could not charge, because residents would consume it without paying.
  • So the market supplies none, and the government funds defence through taxation instead.

Pure and Quasi-Public Goods

  1. A pure public good is fully non-rival and fully non-excludable, such as national defence.
  2. A quasi-public good has these features only in part.
    1. A road is non-rival until it becomes congested, and tolls can make it partly excludable.
  3. Quasi-public goods therefore sit between pure public goods and private goods, so whether the market can supply them depends on how far they can be metered.
Example
  • Street lighting benefits every passer-by and cannot be switched off for non-payers, so it is a pure public good.
  • A public beach is a quasi-public good, because it can become crowded and access can sometimes be fenced and charged for.

Technology and Excludability

  1. Excludability can change as technology changes.
  2. Metering and digital access can make it possible to charge non-payers who once consumed for free.
    1. Electronic tolls now let firms charge, say £2 per trip, for roads that were once open to all.
  3. A good's public-good status is therefore not fixed over time; it depends on the technology available to exclude non-payers.

Can the market ever provide public goods?

  1. The free-rider argument holds because genuine non-excludability removes any way to charge, so a profit-seeking firm earns no revenue and a pure public good such as national defence is simply not supplied.
  2. But excludability is a matter of degree, not an absolute, since tolls, encryption and metering can turn quasi-public goods such as toll roads or subscription broadcasts into profitable private provision.
  3. Even where a firm can charge, it may still under-provide, because pricing a non-rival good above the zero marginal cost of serving one extra user needlessly deters beneficial use.
  4. On balance, the market cannot supply a genuinely pure public good, but whether it provides a particular good depends on how far technology lets non-payers be excluded and on how rival the good becomes as more people use it.
Exam technique
  • Test a good against both non-rivalry and non-excludability before labelling it a public good.
  • Link non-excludability directly to the free-rider problem and then to non-provision.
    • Naming the missing market secures the analysis marks.
  • Support the point with a concrete example such as defence or street lighting.
Common Mistake
  • Do not label every government-provided good a public good.
    • The label depends on the good's technical features, not on who supplies it.
  • Do not confuse a public good with a merit good.
    • A merit good is rival and excludable, so the market does provide it, just in too small a quantity.
Self review
  • State the two characteristics of a public good.
  • Explain the free-rider problem.
  • Explain why the market provides none of a pure public good.
  • Distinguish a pure public good from a quasi-public good.
  • Explain how technology can change a good's classification.
PreviousNext

How was this guide?

Teach Genie

Review 1.6.2 nature and definition of public goods by teaching Genie

Teach it back in your own words, spot gaps, and remember it better.

Start teaching
Genie and Baby Genie

Lesson

Recap your knowledge with an interactive lesson

8 minute activity

Start lesson

A public good has two defining characteristics: it is non-rival and non-excludable in consumption. A pure public good has both characteristics fully.

Non-rivalry means that one person's use does not reduce the amount or benefit available to another person. Non-excludability means that people cannot be prevented from consuming the good even when they do not pay.

National defence and street lighting are standard examples. The fact that government provides a good does not, by itself, make it a public good.

Flashcards

Remember key concepts with flashcards

25 flashcards

Practice flashcards

Why does one person's consumption of a non-rival good not reduce what is available to others?

1.6.2 nature and definition of public goods Revision Guide

  1. Intl A Level
  2. /Economics
  3. /1.6.2 nature and definition of public goods

Revision notes for CIE Intl A Level Economics 1.6.2 nature and definition of public goods: explanations and worked examples.

Revision guides