Marriage is judged through women’s comfort
A married state affords but little ease
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | line 1.
The best of husbands are so hard to please.
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | line 2.
- The opening replaces romantic promise with an assessment of practical wellbeing.
- Even favourable husbands supposedly demand difficult emotional work.
- This sweeping judgement establishes the adviser’s persuasive position.
- It should not become a factual claim about every marriage.
Appearances can conceal unhappiness
This in wives’ careful faces you may spell Though they dissemble their misfortunes well.
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | lines 3–4.
- Worried faces become texts the speaker claims to read.
- Outward composure may disguise private difficulty.
- The reading metaphor challenges public images of successful marriage.
- The wives themselves never confirm the adviser’s interpretation of their feelings.
Single life becomes a positive alternative
A virgin state is crowned with much content;
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | line 5.
No blustering husbands to create your fears; No pangs of childbirth to extort your tears;
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | lines 7–8.
- The crown metaphor gives unmarried life honour and contentment.
- Repeated negatives accumulate burdens the addressee could avoid.
- Fear, childbirth and childcare ground persuasion in bodily and domestic experience.
- Idealised single happiness remains a rhetorical generalisation rather than a universal guarantee.
The advice combines freedom with restraint
Few worldly crosses to distract your prayers:
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | line 10.
Turn, turn apostate to love’s levity,
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | line 14.
- Fewer domestic distractions can allow greater spiritual attention.
- The repeated command makes resistance to romance urgent and deliberate.
- Religious language reverses the expected devotion to love.
- Suppressing desire makes this alternative require self-control rather than effortless pleasure.
The ending rejects a threat against unmarried women
There’s no such thing as leading apes in hell.
- An unnamed adviser warning an unmarried woman against marriage | line 16.
- The proverbial punishment would make single life a source of fear.
- The speaker dismisses it, offering permission to refuse marriage.
- Adjacent rhymes support a compact and decisive persuasive manner.
- The poem ends with advice, not a narrated decision by the addressee.
Literary terms used in this guide
- Anaphora: Repetition of a word or phrase at the beginnings of successive clauses or lines.
- Allusion: A reference to a recognisable story, belief, text or cultural expression.
- Apostate: Someone who abandons a faith or allegiance; the poem applies the term provocatively to a change of loyalty towards love.
Close analysis: A worked analytical paragraph
Close analysis
Detailed study of how precise words, images, sounds, structural choices or dramatic actions create meaning in a text.
- Philips’s adviser challenges the assumption that marriage guarantees happiness. Worried faces expose a gap between respectable appearances and private experience, while the catalogue of avoided burdens makes single life seem valuable. Yet the recommended alternative requires self-restraint, complicating a simple celebration of freedom. The final dismissal of punishment removes a fear used against unmarried women, reinforcing the possibility of choosing differently.
Using and checking quotations
- References: Katherine Philips, “A Married State”; Jack Lynch edited text, checked against the Norton anthology reproduction.
- Compare spelling, punctuation and line numbering with your assigned edition before learning a passage.
- How does the opening challenge romantic expectations?
- What does the reading metaphor reveal?
- Why does the poem repeat negatives?
- What restraint does the adviser recommend?
- What fear does the ending dismiss?