Source A: The keeper’s ledger
An original contemporary non-fiction-style practice text, written for this question.
The box arrived on a wet Monday morning with a label tied to its handle: RECOVERED FROM NORTH HEAD SIGNAL STORE — CONTENTS WATER-DAMAGED. A dark line marked the height the floodwater had reached. Below it, the cardboard had dried into soft, buckled layers.
I carried it to the conservation table and began the routine: photograph, number, separate, record. I liked routines. They made damage measurable. A page was either stable or it was not; ink was legible, partly legible or lost. Rules stood around an object like fences, keeping sympathy at a useful distance.
Inside the box lay three account books, a bundle of tide records and a narrow ledger bound in green cloth. Its cover had faded almost to grey, but a name remained visible beneath the stain:
Elias Alden, Senior Keeper.
I read it twice.
Alden is not a rare name, I told myself. Even so, I placed both hands flat on the table before turning the cover. Elias Alden was also the name of my great-grandfather, the keeper blamed for failing to warn a passenger vessel away from the East Shoal. In my family’s version, he had remained at his post throughout the fog, ringing a bell no one on the ship had heard. My grandmother repeated the story whenever the newspaper printed an anniversary article. ‘They needed one man to carry everyone else’s mistake,’ she would say.
I had never asked who ‘they’ were.
The first pages offered nothing dramatic. Wind direction. Visibility. Oil used. Repairs requested. The handwriting moved steadily across the paper, narrow and upright, refusing every opportunity for flourish. For twenty-six pages, the sea behaved itself. I began to breathe normally again.
Then I reached the night of the wreck.
12.40 a.m. Fog closing from east.
1.05 a.m. Main lamp extinguished. Cause unknown.
1.20 a.m. Left station to assist Pike’s child.
I stopped reading.
The sentence was perfectly clear. There was no stain across it, no missing corner, no generous blur in which another meaning might hide. Left station. Two words had opened a door beneath the family story, and everything familiar was falling through it.
I made myself continue.
1.36 a.m. Returned. Bell rope severed. Hand signal attempted.
1.41 a.m. Vessel observed on east rocks.
Beneath this, the ink spread into a brown cloud. I lowered the lamp and changed its angle. A final sentence hovered inside the stain. At first I read, I chose the child. Then it seemed to say, I closed the light. When I looked again, I could make out only the first letter: a thin upright stroke that might have been an I, or merely a crack in the paper.
‘Anything special?’ called Mara from the next table.
‘No,’ I said too quickly.
The word sat between us, neat and false.
For the rest of the morning, I worked around the ledger. I flattened maps, replaced tissue and entered measurements into the catalogue. Yet the closed book seemed to occupy more space than the open ones. I wanted the blurred sentence to defend him. I wanted it to condemn him clearly. Either certainty would have been easier than the small, stubborn facts: he had left; he had returned; the bell had failed; a child had needed help; a ship had struck the rocks five minutes later.
The museum director had already planned a display about the wreck. By Friday, she needed my recommendation for the label. I drafted three versions. The first repeated the accusation. The second repeated my grandmother’s defence. I deleted them both.
The version I finally sent described what the ledger recorded and what it could not prove. It did not clear Elias Alden’s name. It did not preserve the story I had inherited. When the ledger went on display, I placed the damaged page inside a transparent sleeve, with every readable line exposed.
Under the glass, the page looked calm.
I did not.
How does the writer use language and structure to shape the narrator’s changing response to the ledger, and how far does the ending resolve the conflict she experiences?
Support your answer with detailed examples from the text, including brief quotations.
220 exam-style questions on Edexcel A IGCSE English Language 1.1 Content overview, covering 1.1.1 Anthology non-fiction texts, 1.1.2 Analysing linguistic and structural devices, 1.1.3 Links and connections between writers' ideas, 1.1.4 Transactional writing for purpose and audience, and 1.1.5 Accurate spelling, punctuation and grammar. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.