Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

1.1.3 Links and connections between writers' ideas

Links and connections between writers' ideas: understand the requirement

  1. Specification focus. Explore links and connections between writers’ ideas and perspectives.
  2. Why it matters. The requirement is demonstrated through relevant decisions and developed evidence, not by repeating terminology or a memorised paragraph formula.
Key Idea
  • Translate the wording into an action: decide what you must identify, interpret, analyse, compare, evaluate, craft or deliver.

Links and connections between writers' ideas: practical method

  1. Decode the task. Identify form, audience and purpose before choosing voice, content and organisation.
  2. Plan progression. Give each paragraph a distinct role and order ideas so that the piece develops rather than repeats.
  3. Craft deliberately. Choose precise vocabulary and vary sentence structures to control clarity, pace, tone and emphasis.
  4. Edit in layers. Check meaning and structure first, then grammar, punctuation and spelling.

Links and connections between writers' ideas: apply the skill

  1. Worked approach. Begin with a precise claim, support it with a carefully chosen example, explain the reasoning or crafted choice, and connect the result back to the task.
  2. Improve through diagnosis. Name the exact weakness, such as unsupported inference, thin analysis, weak organisation or inaccurate expression, then revise that feature and compare the result.
Exam technique
  • For Pearson Edexcel International GCSE English Language A, follow the exact component route and command words. Balance textual knowledge, developed analysis and controlled writing.
Common Mistake
  • Avoid generic effects and universal formulas. Every explanation or crafted choice must fit this task, text, purpose and audience.
Self review
  • Can I explain links and connections between writers' ideas in my own words?
  • Can I apply the method to an unfamiliar task?
  • Have I used precise evidence or deliberate crafted choices?
  • Can I identify and correct one likely weakness?
PreviousNext

How was this guide?

Teach Genie

Review 1.1.3 Links and connections between writers' ideas by teaching Genie

Teach it back in your own words, spot gaps, and remember it better.

Start teaching
Genie and Baby Genie

Lesson

Recap your knowledge with an interactive lesson

7 minute activity

Start lesson

Exploring links and connections means showing how writers’ ideas and perspectives relate to one another. You should identify a relationship, support it with precise evidence, and explain what the relationship reveals.

Translate the task into an action: identify, interpret, compare, analyse, evaluate or craft. Do not simply repeat terms such as “similar” or “different”; demonstrate the connection through developed explanation.

A useful comparison may involve agreement, contrast, development, cause and effect, or a difference in viewpoint, purpose or attitude.

Questions

Put it into practice with exam-style questions

77 exam-style questions

Practice questions

Question 1

22 marks

Source A: The height of the appeal

An original contemporary non-fiction-style practice text, written for this question.

The sketch showed a person suspended between two rooftops, with our charity’s name beneath their feet. It was a good picture. Even before anyone had checked the buildings, somebody had made it the opening slide of the fundraising plan. The proposed crossing would be called a leap for the future, though the person making it was supposed to walk along a cable. The language had become airborne before the arrangements had left the table.

I helped organise the charity’s appeals. We needed money for a quiet, unphotogenic purpose: keeping a telephone advice service open on weekday evenings. The crossing promised publicity which ordinary accounts of our work rarely obtained. A supporter offered to attempt it, and a local company offered a large donation if the event went ahead. Everyone wanted the service to survive. That shared purpose made it strangely difficult to ask whether this particular idea deserved to survive with it.

At the planning meeting, I asked about wind, access to the roofs and what would happen if the participant had to stop halfway. These were questions, not predictions of disaster. Yet each sounded, in the room, like a withdrawal of enthusiasm. Someone said a professional would deal with the technical details. We had not appointed that professional. Someone else said the participant was extremely confident. I wrote confidence in my notebook, then left a large space beside it.

The estimates arrived the following week. Proper assessment, equipment and event support would cost far more than the first sketch suggested. The company’s donation remained generous, but the calculation now had several extra lines. We could not count the promised income without counting the price of making the event responsible. Nor could we treat the possibility of assistance as though it were a private arrangement between the participant and the sky.

We abandoned the rooftop crossing. It was an awkward decision to announce after the sketch had travelled so widely. A few people said we had lost our nerve. Perhaps we had lost something more useful: the belief that a striking image could do the thinking for us. The supporter later helped run a much smaller appeal, which paid for several months of evening calls. Its photographs showed people sitting at tables. Nobody mistook them for a feat.

I still want our work to be noticed. I no longer assume that the most dramatic way of attracting attention is the best use of the attention we receive. The advice line needed a future. It did not need a person hanging above a street to prove that the future mattered.

Source B: Explorers or boys messing about? Either way, taxpayer gets rescue bill — Steven Morris

Read Source B in the official Pearson anthology (printed pages 8–9).

Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about the relationship between public attention and dangerous ambition.

Support your answer with detailed examples from both texts, including brief quotations.

Flashcards

Remember key concepts with flashcards

12 flashcards

Practice flashcards

When comparing writers, what should you connect as well as their ideas?

1.1.3 Links and connections between writers' ideas Revision Guide

  1. IGCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /1.1.3 Links and connections between writers' ideas

Revision notes for Edexcel A IGCSE English Language 1.1.3 Links and connections between writers' ideas: explanations and worked examples.

Revision guides