Identification with role models
Social learning theory
Bandura's idea that behaviour is learnt by watching and imitating other people, especially when you see the model being rewarded for that behaviour.
- The social learning theory of criminality says all behaviour, including offending, is learnt by watching other people.
- Children are the most open to it, because they are still working out how people in their world behave.
- The person being watched is the role model, and the pull you feel towards them is identification.
- Identification is the first link in the chain, because you attend closely to a model you feel connected to.

- You attend most closely to a model you can see yourself in, so similarity in age, sex, background and circumstances helps decide whose behaviour gets copied.
- Family are the first models, peers take over in adolescence, and a figure on a screen counts as a model as well.
- That is why offending clusters in families, friendship groups and particular streets without any shared gene doing the work.
Where role models come from
Role model
A person whose behaviour is watched and may later be copied, such as a parent, an older sibling, a friend or a figure on a screen. A role model does not have to be present in person or intend to be copied.
- Family: the earliest and usually the strongest models.
- Parents, carers and older siblings are watched for years before anybody else gets a look in.
- A child shares their background, accent and circumstances, so what they do looks like an option that is open to someone like them.
- Peers: the models who take over in adolescence.
- Friends and slightly older teenagers on the same estate or in the same year group model what is normal for that group.
- Because they are close in age, similarity is high and the behaviour looks achievable rather than adult and distant.
- Media and game characters: models watched on a screen rather than in person.
- Figures in television, film, music and video games are still models, even though they never meet you.
- Cooper and Mackie (1986) used exactly this kind of model, and children who had watched or played the violent game later chose the aggressive toy more often.
- A 14-year-old in Manchester has an older brother who shoplifts and is admired for it by his friends.
- They share a home, a background and only three years in age, so identification is strong.
- That teenager is more likely to copy the shoplifting than they would be after watching a stranger do the same thing.
What makes identification stronger
Identification
Taking on the qualities, values or behaviour of a person you admire, so that you feel more like them. The stronger this connection, the more likely their behaviour is to be copied.
- Similarity: a model who matches you in age, sex, ethnicity or background is easier to identify with.
- Status: a model who is admired, feared or seen as successful carries more weight than an ordinary onlooker.
- Warmth: a model who is close to you and treats you well is copied more than a distant one.
- Contact: the more often you see the model behave that way, the more chances there are to attend to it.
- Once identification is in place, watching the model act leaves a mental representation of the behaviour, which is stored and available later.
- Identification and imitation are not the same word.
- Identification is the connection you feel with the model, and imitation is the copying that may follow.
- Identifying with an offender does not make offending certain, because it only raises the likelihood.
Why offending runs in families and areas
- Where a child's closest models offend, the behaviour they see most often is the behaviour they are most likely to store.
- Two brothers can end up with similar records without any shared gene doing the work, because they shared the same models.
- It also explains area differences, since visible offending on a street supplies models to every child who walks down it.
- The same mechanism runs the other way, which is why rehabilitation schemes deliberately supply positive role models.
- Identification only settles which model a young person attends to.
- How watching turns into copying is covered under observation and imitation.
- What happens to the model afterwards is covered under vicarious reinforcement, and what happens to the observer under direct reinforcement.
Turning this into marks
- When a question asks you to explain one person's offending, name the model and the shared characteristic as two separate points rather than one point rephrased.
- Name the feature that drives the identification, such as a three year age gap or a shared home, because writing that the boy looked up to his brother does not secure the knowledge mark.
- Finish by naming the behaviour that was copied, so the chain from model to identification to imitation is complete.
- The mark most often lost is describing what the model did without ever saying why that particular person was the model.
- What is meant by identification in the social learning theory of criminality?
- Give three kinds of role model a young person might identify with.
- Name two things that make identification with a model stronger.
- Explain the difference between identification and imitation.
- How does Cooper and Mackie (1986) support the influence of models on behaviour?