Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

2.2 Studies

EasyMediumHard
12345678910111213141516
Question 10

Alternative explanation: backward counting displaces or interferes with the trigram; the decline need not show passive short-term decay across the delay.

Assess whether Peterson and Peterson's result supports short-term decay more strongly than the interference explanation described.

[4]
Markscheme

2.2 Studies Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /Psychology
  3. /2.2 Studies

39 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE Psychology 2.2 Studies, covering 2.2.1 Bartlett (1932) War of the Ghosts and 2.2.2 Peterson and Peterson (1959). Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank