Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·4.1.3 Short and extended response question types
Sign up

4.1.3 Short and extended response question types

EasyMediumHard
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950
Question 35

Speaking in a school debate

Two original fictional non-fiction texts for reading practice.

Text A: a debate coach’s notes

New speakers often imagine confidence means never pausing. They fill every space, then discover that listeners cannot follow an argument delivered without a moment to consider it. I encourage pupils to mark the point they most want remembered and allow it room.

Preparation helps, but a script can become a hiding place. Some pupils read an excellent paragraph without noticing that the previous speaker has challenged its central assumption. A shorter contribution that responds to the discussion may do more than a polished passage planned before it began.

I also want experienced speakers to notice who has not entered the debate. Inviting another pupil's evidence can be a strong contribution, not a surrender of the floor. The aim is not equal noise from every chair. It is a discussion in which people can understand and test one another's claims. A speaker who changes a position after hearing evidence has not necessarily lost.

Text B: a pupil’s reflection

My first debate felt like a test of whether I could keep talking until my time was up. I had prepared two pages and was relieved when nobody interrupted. Afterwards, a classmate asked why I had ignored the example raised immediately before me. I had heard it, but I did not know how to leave my script without losing my place.

The next time, I brought headings and a few details rather than full paragraphs. I paused more, which felt worse to me than it apparently sounded to others. A partner told me that the pause made my main point easier to hear. I am beginning to distinguish sounding fluent from making myself understood.

I still need preparation time and do not want spontaneous speaking treated as a talent everyone already possesses. It helped when the chair let us note a response before inviting comments. I also changed one claim after an opponent supplied a missing detail. That was uncomfortable, but it made the final discussion more accurate than my first plan.

Compare what the two writers say about pupils speaking in school debates. Make it clear which text you are using.

[8]
Markscheme

4.1.3 Short and extended response question types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /4.1.3 Short and extended response question types

120 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 4.1.3 Short and extended response question types. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions