Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading
Sign up

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288
Question 214

Different ways to clean up a neighbourhood

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented community projects.

Text One: An original report about a canal-path clean-up.

Volunteers signed in and were assigned to one of four short sections of the canal path. Each group had a leader with a route card showing its meeting place and return time. People could either collect litter or record problems such as overflowing bins.

Before the groups left, the organiser explained that sharp or heavy objects should not be touched. Volunteers marked their location and informed the group leader instead. Families with younger children worked around the picnic area, away from the nearby road.

The organisers counted the filled sacks, but their report also listed a blocked drain and places where the same kind of litter appeared repeatedly. Several volunteers said that they had enjoyed learning more about the area and meeting neighbours. Some late arrivals had not known which group to join, so a volunteer would remain at the sign-in desk throughout the next event.

Text Two: An original account of a clean-up around a housing estate.

Participants booked a forty-five-minute time slot so that everyone did not arrive together. At the meeting point, coloured tags showed whether each person would work in the courtyard or along one of the surrounding lanes. A local resident guided each group.

Volunteers could collect litter or complete a street checklist showing damaged bins and places where rubbish had gathered. After a short safety demonstration, younger children worked with an adult in the enclosed garden.

At the end, the organisers recorded the number of sacks collected, compared the street checklists and invited suggestions. One group recommended moving a bin closer to a frequently used bench. Many volunteers stayed for the discussion because they wanted to understand why particular corners repeatedly needed attention.

Using information from both texts, synthesise the main points about how the two community clean-up days were organised and what participants gained from them.

You should consider:

  • how volunteers were grouped and guided;
  • how different people could contribute;
  • how the organisers judged the value of each event.
[8]
Markscheme

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

528 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading, covering 3.1.1 Understanding description, narration and exposition texts, 3.1.2 Range of continuous and non-continuous texts, 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types, and 3.1.4 Editing task at word, sentence and text level. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions