Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading
Sign up

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288
Question 179

Listening at the same place

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented people, places or projects.

Text One: An original account of an invented neighbourhood listening project.

Our group visited four agreed stopping points before the shops opened. We wrote down sounds we could distinguish, including birdsong, engines and the movement of shutters. We did not try to name every bird. A sound we could not identify was marked as uncertain rather than given a confident label.

We returned to the same points in the afternoon. At the courtyard, voices covered the call we had heard clearly earlier. One participant wrote that the bird had gone. Another pointed out that we could no longer hear it, which was a smaller claim. Both versions remained in the discussion notes, with the reason for the correction.

The map displayed the time of each visit beside our observations. It also named the places we had not reached. We had described two visits, not produced a permanent inventory of the neighbourhood's sounds.

Text Two: An original report about a different fictional sound-observation exercise.

A class compared listening notes from the same garden entrance over three afternoons. Each pair stood in the agreed location for five minutes and recorded both the date and the start time. The teacher asked them to separate what they heard from what they believed had caused it.

A repeated tapping sound produced several suggested explanations. Instead of selecting the most popular answer, the class marked its source as unknown. A short recording helped them revisit its rhythm, but did not establish its cause. The microphone also failed to preserve a faint sound that two pupils remembered hearing.

For the final display, the class grouped recurring observations but retained differences between visits. Empty spaces on a sheet meant that nothing had been recorded under that heading; they did not prove that a particular sound was absent. The accompanying explanation set out the limited duration and location of the exercise.

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about recording and interpreting observations of sounds.

[8]
Markscheme

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

528 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading, covering 3.1.1 Understanding description, narration and exposition texts, 3.1.2 Range of continuous and non-continuous texts, 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types, and 3.1.4 Editing task at word, sentence and text level. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions