Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading
Sign up

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288
Question 127

Counting bicycles at the entrance

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented people, places or projects.

Text One: An original account of an invented cycle-parking trial.

The organisers of a community event wanted to decide where temporary cycle racks should be placed in future. Their record included more than the number of bicycles. It noted the time of each count, whether entrances were open and anything that might have made the racks easier or harder to see.

During the first hour, six bicycles were fastened to railings instead of being left in the racks. One visitor said that the racks were “too hidden”, but the note-taker placed this comment in quotation marks rather than recording it as a confirmed explanation. Later, a barrier was moved and the racks became visible from farther away. Fewer bicycles were then left at the railings, although the crowd was also becoming smaller. The organisers therefore did not claim that moving the barrier had caused the change.

The dated record preserved the earlier arrangement as well as the revised one, allowing the team to plan another trial. However, the note-taker had remained near the main entrance. The record could not show how many people arrived elsewhere or how many decided not to bring a bicycle at all.

Text Two: An extract from the log of a different fictional cycle-parking trial.

Trial periodRecorded arrangement and resultOther recorded conditionsDecision entered in the log
1Racks beside the main entrance; 28 bicycles in racks and 6 at railingsDry weather; both entrances openAdd a larger sign and repeat the trial
2Racks in the same place with a larger sign; 35 bicycles in racks and 2 at railingsSide entrance closed; a steward directed arrivalsKeep the sign, but do not assume it caused the change
3Racks moved beside the side entrance; 19 bicycles in racks and none at railingsHeavy rain; total attendance was lowerTest this position again during a busier session

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about how trial records can guide decisions without proving what caused the results.

[8]
Markscheme

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

528 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading, covering 3.1.1 Understanding description, narration and exposition texts, 3.1.2 Range of continuous and non-continuous texts, 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types, and 3.1.4 Editing task at word, sentence and text level. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions