Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading
Sign up

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288
Question 68

Tools between neighbours

The two texts below were written for this practice question and describe invented community projects.

Text One: A report about a neighbourhood tool store.

Donated tools were inspected before they entered the lending store. A bright case did not guarantee that the tool inside worked properly, while a scratched tool might still be reliable. Volunteers recorded its condition and checked that essential pieces, such as a charger or cutting guide, remained with it.

Members were asked what they intended to do before an item was issued. This sometimes revealed that a different tool would be more suitable. For unfamiliar equipment, a volunteer demonstrated its use and watched the member repeat the important steps. The collection was cleaned and checked after every loan, since one damp or incomplete return could delay several later bookings.

The store enabled residents to complete occasional jobs without buying equipment they had nowhere to keep. However, this depended on honest reports of faults and enough volunteers to prepare each item for its next user.

Text Two: An interview about a tool-lending scheme in another community.

Interviewer: What does your online catalogue tell borrowers?

Organiser: It shows the types of tool we hold and lets people request one. Before collection, we still test the item and make sure all the attachments listed on its case are present.

Interviewer: Can experienced members simply collect what they have booked?

Organiser: We ask about the planned job rather than assuming experience. A brief conversation may prevent someone taking an unsuitable tool, and we offer a demonstration when it is needed.

Interviewer: Has lending been successful?

Organiser: People have repaired furniture and shared skills without filling their homes with rarely used equipment. Yet a late return affects the next borrower, and an unreported fault takes time to investigate. Access improves only when members and volunteers accept those responsibilities.

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about the work involved in lending tools to a community and what the lending achieves for residents.

[8]
Markscheme

3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading

528 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1 Section A (20%) – Reading, covering 3.1.1 Understanding description, narration and exposition texts, 3.1.2 Range of continuous and non-continuous texts, 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types, and 3.1.4 Editing task at word, sentence and text level. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions