Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1.3 Short and extended response question types
Sign up

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261
Question 171

Many boards, one visitor

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented people, places or projects.

Text One: An original report about a fictional simultaneous chess exhibition.

The visiting player moved between twelve boards. Opponents stayed at their own tables and waited for her return before making a move. This created a rhythm different from an ordinary two-person game: a brief exchange was followed by time to consider the position alone.

The organisers made the waiting rule clear before play. They also set aside a separate table where beginners could ask a club volunteer questions without interrupting a game. Spectators stood behind a marked line. A camera showing one board on a screen helped people follow that game, but did not explain what was happening on the other eleven.

Afterwards, several opponents said they remembered the visiting player's short comments more clearly than the result. The club recorded those responses alongside the number of games. Its review did not treat a spectator, a beginner and a player as though each had attended the same activity in the same way.

Text Two: An original account of a different invented chess-club event.

The club limited its exhibition to eight boards so there would be room to move and talk afterwards. A volunteer explained the format, including when a player should wait. Names on the table cards made it easier for the visitor to return to a question after the final game.

The audience could watch without playing. Printed position cards offered a separate puzzle for visitors unfamiliar with the games on the tables. They were clearly labelled as puzzles, not copies of positions currently being played.

The follow-up discussion took longer than planned because players wanted to revisit decisions. Next time, the club reserved a separate period for this. The report described the event as a mixture of play, observation and conversation. Counting only completed games would have missed much of what participants valued.

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about organising and taking part in a simultaneous chess exhibition.

[8]
Markscheme

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

382 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions