Skip to content

Course home

Question bank·3.1.3 Short and extended response question types
Sign up

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261
Question 163

The seats behind the performance

Both texts are newly written practice sources about invented people, places or projects.

Text One: An original report on an invented amateur theatre's seating project.

The theatre surveyed its seating before commissioning new upholstery. Volunteers recorded each seat by row and number, then noted problems separately: a torn cover, an awkward view or difficulty reaching a place. The report did not assume that replacing fabric would solve every complaint.

Some work was carried out between productions. Other changes needed a longer closure because rows had to be temporarily removed. The schedule distinguished those tasks so that a small repair did not automatically delay every improvement. Photographs showed locations as well as close details, allowing a contractor to find the right seat without relying on a volunteer's memory.

Audience comments after the first phase were useful but incomplete. People who had chosen not to book a difficult seat were absent from that night's responses. The next review therefore invited wider feedback instead of declaring the seating problem finished on the strength of one sold-out performance.

Text Two: An original account of a different fictional community hall's chair trial.

The hall tried a small number of replacement chairs before ordering a full set. Groups used them for a lecture, a rehearsal and a meal. The organiser recorded how each layout worked rather than asking only whether a chair looked attractive in the empty room.

Storage and movement mattered alongside sitting. A chair easy to arrange for a lecture could still be awkward to stack afterwards. Different users also needed different views of a speaker or stage. The trial notes separated the chair itself from the spacing and layout around it.

The final decision retained some existing chairs for particular uses and bought replacements for others. Its explanation included handling, storage, different activities and comments from people who had tried the layouts. The hall had evaluated a working room, not selected one object in isolation.

Synthesise what you learn from both texts about evaluating and improving seating in a performance or community venue.

[8]
Markscheme

3.1.3 Short and extended response question types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /3.1.3 Short and extended response question types

382 exam-style questions on WJEC GCSE English Language 3.1.3 Short and extended response question types. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

More questions