Text 1: The Saturday repair table, by Imogen Shaw

An original contemporary magazine feature.

The first thing on the table is a kettle with a loose handle. Beside it sit a desk lamp, a torn coat and a radio that has stopped finding stations. At the Saturday repair workshop in a former post office, volunteers spread out screwdrivers and thread, and visitors take a number from a bowl.

The workshop was started by electrician Dev Singh and seamstress Lorna Price after they noticed how many household objects were being thrown away for faults that might be simple to fix. It is free to attend, although a donation jar stands near the door. “People arrive apologising for not knowing what to do,” Price tells me. “By the time they leave, they’ve usually done something themselves.”

Some residents say it is easier to replace a broken item than spend a morning trying to repair it. A local retailer has also questioned whether volunteers should be giving advice about electrical goods. Singh takes that concern seriously. Volunteers check each item before work begins, and they refuse jobs they cannot handle. “We’re not pretending every object can be saved,” he says. “We’re trying to make the next decision a better one.”

At my table, a woman called Beth has brought a coat with a split seam. Price shows her how to thread a needle, then waits while Beth tries. The first stitches wobble. The second line holds. Beth turns the coat inside out and studies her work with a look of surprise.

When the workshop closes, the kettle is still waiting for its turn. Nobody seems bothered. One volunteer writes “next Saturday” on a paper tag and ties it to the handle. The objects leave in no hurry, and neither do the people.

Text 2: A storehouse of useful things, by A Correspondent

An original newspaper report written in a nineteenth-century voice; a period simulation, not an archival document.

This newspaper report was written in 1896 about a lending store established by residents of a coastal town for tools and household equipment.

In the old net-makers’ shed, a new storehouse has opened where residents may borrow tools for a small weekly payment. A handcart, a spade, a saw and a cooking pot stand in orderly rows. The keeper notes each loan in a large ledger, and the borrower gives his name before carrying an article away.

The plan was proposed by Mrs Rowe, whose husband is a carpenter. She tells me that many families own neither the tools nor the money to buy them for a single task. “A neighbour may need a saw for one afternoon,” she said, “not a saw for life.” Local tradesmen supplied several of the first articles, and residents contributed the rest.

The scheme has not escaped criticism. One shopkeeper fears that lending will reduce sales, while a householder says that anything shared will soon be broken. Mrs Rowe answers that the articles are inspected on return and that the weekly payment helps replace worn equipment. I saw a lad bring back a spade with soil still on its blade; the keeper handed him a brush and waited while he cleaned it.

There is something practical in this arrangement. A family can mend a gate, prepare a garden plot or cook for visitors without buying what it may seldom use. The borrower must take care of what is entrusted to him, and the storehouse must keep an honest account. Neither side can succeed without the other.

The shed has no fine sign above its door. It has a list of names, a ledger, and tools ready for another hand. That is a small beginning, but a useful one.

Both texts describe community schemes involving household objects and equipment.

Compare:

• what the writers say about these schemes
• how the writers try to persuade readers of their views

You must use the text to support your comments and make it clear which text you are referring to.