Text 1: The bridge that came back, by Elin Marsh
An original contemporary newspaper feature.
The footbridge over the Lune Beck is only twelve metres long, but when the November storm tore two of its boards loose, the village of Greystone lost its shortest route to the bus stop. I met the repair group at seven on Saturday morning. Their leader, Salma Reed, had brought a tool bag, a thermos and a list of jobs written on the back of an envelope.
‘People offered to help as soon as they heard,’ she told me. ‘The tricky part was getting everyone to agree what was safe to do.’ Salma had asked the council to inspect the supports before anyone touched them. She would not let the volunteers start until the reply came.
The delay mattered to some residents. Mr Hales, who uses a walking frame, now had to take the longer road to his weekly appointment. A parent I spoke to was worried about the extra walk to the bus with two small children. But the group did not rush. They measured the gap, sorted sound boards from cracked ones and waited for the approved replacement timber to arrive.
By lunchtime, the new boards were fixed and the handrail had been tightened. Salma tested each section with her own weight before waving the others across. A little girl ran over first, then stopped halfway to look back at her father. The group stood aside as the bridge filled with people again.
‘It’s not grand,’ Salma said, watching them go. ‘It just gets you where you need to be.’ On Monday, the bus driver told me, his first passengers had crossed the beck instead of walking the long way round.
Text 2: Notes from the county survey, by Arthur Bell
An original diary written in a nineteenth-century voice; a period simulation, not an archival document.
These diary entries, written in 1893, describe a county surveyor visiting a rural footbridge after a winter flood.
January 12th. The bridge at Rookery Ford has lost a rail and several planks. I found six men waiting beside it, each with an opinion and none with a measuring tape. The miller said the village had crossed there for generations. A farmer said the ford was passable, if one did not mind wet boots. The schoolmistress said the children did mind.
I explained that a bridge is not made sound by calling it familiar. The men were keen to begin at once, but the bank had softened where the water had eaten into it. I marked the damaged end and asked them to keep away until I could report the condition to the county office.
January 16th. The office has sent no timber and no date. The miller came to my lodging to ask whether a few boards might be laid for the present. I could not permit it. He left with his hat in his hand and said that people who travelled by carriage did not notice the extra mile on foot.
January 23rd. I returned with two labourers and the approved timber. The farmer, who had said the ford was easy, carried our tools across the stream in a basket. We worked until the light failed, replacing the planks and setting a new rail. I had expected complaints; instead, the miller brought a kettle from his house and the children watched from the far bank.
The bridge is open again. I have entered the repair in the county book. There is no column for the people who waited, nor for the distance they walked while they did so. I shall add a note in the margin, though no one may read it.
Both texts describe people responding to damage to a footbridge.
Compare:
You must use the text to support your comments and make it clear which text you are referring to.
110 exam-style questions on Eduqas GCSE English Language 2.4 Comparing texts, covering 2.4.1 Critical comparison of two or more texts. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.