Following the painted arrows
Text A: an original contemporary practice extract.
The painted arrow on the village sign pointed into a lane I had always assumed led only to garages. My sister and I followed it and found a narrow path behind the gardens, then a pond visible through a gap in the hedge. The printed trail had promised ordinary features rather than spectacular views. It delivered a part of an ordinary place that I had never entered.
Following the arrows left us free to talk instead of deciding at every junction. At one turn, we stopped to look at a wall where several kinds of stone had been fitted together. The route had not told us to stop there. It had supplied a sequence within which our own attention could find something. A plan did not have to fill every moment in order to make the afternoon useful.
I will still walk without a trail when I want to. But a familiar area is not necessarily an area I know well, and a modest marked route can disturb the assumption that it is. Back at the sign, I saw the lane entrance differently. We had covered a short loop, yet the next walk through the village would contain a pond I no longer had to imagine.
Text B: an original contemporary practice extract.
On the marked walk, I began looking for the next arrow before finishing my look at the current street. Each junction offered a correct turn, and I found myself pleased to take it correctly. A bakery window interested me, but it stood in the opposite direction. I said we could return afterwards and continued along the approved line.
There was nothing wrong with the route. It passed several pleasant places and brought us back when the leaflet said it would. The difficulty was the habit I brought to it: treating completion as the purpose of being out. Nobody had forbidden a detour. Still, the arrow’s simple confidence made my own curiosity sound like a delay that needed permission.
I recommend marked trails to people who want help finding a way through an unfamiliar place. I also recommend leaving one when the afternoon allows and something else attracts attention. The leaflet is an offer, not an examiner with a final tick beside the starting point. On my next visit, I went into the bakery first. The walk became shorter and, for me, more complete.
Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about marked walking trails. Support your comparisons with detailed references to both texts.
260 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE English Language 2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types, covering 2.3.9 Write an article, 2.3.10 Write a letter, 2.3.11 Write a review, 2.3.12 Write a text for a speech, and 2.3.13 Write a section for a guide, textbook, leaflet or booklet. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.