Skip to content

Course home

Sign up

2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types

EasyMediumHard
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110
Question 48

A reminder about homework

Text A: an original contemporary practice extract.

The homework reminder appeared on my phone before I left the library. It named the chapter and the day the notes were due. I had written only reading in my diary, a word broad enough to include almost anything on my desk. The school’s message gave that vague intention a page range and a date I could check.

I still had to do the work. Opening the notification did not mean the notes were written, and I moved it off the screen when it interrupted another task. Later, I used the entry to plan which evening had enough time. The system was helpful when I treated it as information to use, rather than proof that something was already under control because it had been announced.

A teacher corrected one deadline and the updated entry reached us that afternoon. Paper notes would have needed correcting too. I want accurate instructions and a way to ask when they are unclear; either format can fail to provide them. For me, the digital reminder reduced one avoidable uncertainty. It did not make homework effortless, but it made the effort easier to arrange around the rest of the week.

Text B: an original contemporary practice extract.

I support clear homework instructions, but I am less enthusiastic about every deadline arriving as a notification. My son’s phone already carries messages from friends and reminders from clubs. The school tasks appear among them, briefly urgent and quickly replaced. Their arrival can look like attention to homework when it has produced only another swipe.

We asked him to put the tasks into one weekly plan. He could use a notebook or a screen; the important thing was seeing the time available before accepting another evening’s activity. Copying the task was not a magical cure for forgetting. It gave us a moment to ask what doing it would require, a question a reminder’s arrival had not answered.

Keep the digital information current and offer another route for pupils who cannot reliably receive it. But do not count messages sent as work organised. A school can supply a deadline without supplying the routine in which it will be met. I would judge the system by whether pupils can find and use the instructions, not by how busy their phones have become with evidence that instructions exist.

Compare how the writers present their ideas and perspectives about digital homework reminders. Support your comparisons with detailed references to both texts.

[14]
Markscheme

2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types Questions

  1. GCSE
  2. /English Language
  3. /2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types

260 exam-style questions on Edexcel GCSE English Language 2.3 Content: non-fiction study and transactional text types, covering 2.3.9 Write an article, 2.3.10 Write a letter, 2.3.11 Write a review, 2.3.12 Write a text for a speech, and 2.3.13 Write a section for a guide, textbook, leaflet or booklet. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank