Life-cycle assessments measure impact at every stage
Life-cycle assessment
An analysis of the environmental impact of a material or product at every stage of its life, from obtaining the raw materials to disposal.
- Obtaining raw materials covers mining ores, drilling for crude oil or felling trees, and the energy and land these use.
- Manufacture covers turning the raw materials into the product and its packaging.
- Use covers the energy and resources the product needs during its working life, such as the fuel a car burns.
- Disposal covers what happens at the end of the product's life, whether it goes to landfill, is burned or is recycled.
- Transport between the stages is also counted, because moving materials and products burns fuel.
At each stage, the assessment records the energy used, the resources consumed and the waste and pollution released.
A life-cycle assessment values each impact to compare products
- Some impacts can be measured as numbers, such as the energy used in megajoules or the mass of carbon dioxide released.
- Other impacts, such as the effect of a quarry on the landscape, are hard to measure and depend on value judgements.
- Different people weigh these effects differently, so two assessments of the same product can reach different conclusions.
- Products should be compared when they do the same job, such as one drinks container against another.
- An assessment may be selective, because a company could leave out stages that make its own product look worse.
- A shortened assessment used to advertise a product can therefore give a misleading picture.
Do not treat a life-cycle assessment as completely objective, because some impacts are estimated and the person carrying it out decides what to include.
Interpreting life-cycle data by comparing overall values
- Read every row of the table, including raw materials, energy, percentage recycled and cost, before deciding.
- Convert values given per kilogram into values per product, because containers made of different materials have different masses.
- Multiply the value per kilogram by the mass of one product in kilograms.
- A material with a lower energy use per kilogram can still need more energy per product if each product is heavier.
- One material is rarely best on every row, so weigh up the factors and state which one decides the choice.
Energy needed to make two containers
- Container A has a mass of 20 g20\,\text{g}20g and its material needs 60 MJ/kg60\,\text{MJ/kg}60MJ/kg to make, while container B has a mass of 40 g40\,\text{g}40g and needs 45 MJ/kg45\,\text{MJ/kg}45MJ/kg; which needs less energy per container?
- Convert the masses: 20 g=0.020 kg20\,\text{g} = 0.020\,\text{kg}20g=0.020kg and 40 g=0.040 kg40\,\text{g} = 0.040\,\text{kg}40g=0.040kg.
- Energy for A =0.020×60=1.2 MJ= 0.020 \times 60 = 1.2\,\text{MJ}=0.020×60=1.2MJ per container.
- Energy for B =0.040×45=1.8 MJ= 0.040 \times 45 = 1.8\,\text{MJ}=0.040×45=1.8MJ per container.
- Container A needs less energy per container, even though its material needs more energy per kilogram.
Recycling for a different use needs suitable properties
Recycling
Collecting and processing used materials so that they can be made into new products.
Viable
Workable in practice, because a process is technically possible, affordable and makes something people will use.
- Used PET bottles are collected, sorted by type of plastic, washed and shredded into flakes.
- The flakes are melted and pushed through tiny holes to make fibres, which are spun into yarn for fleece clothing.
- This works because PET keeps the properties a fibre needs, being strong, flexible and able to be melted and reshaped.
- A fleece does not need the food-grade purity of a drinks bottle, so small traces of contamination do not matter.
- Making fibres from recycled PET uses less energy and crude oil than making new PET, so the product can be cheaper.
- Crushed waste glass is reused in a similar way as a substitute for sand in road surfaces and concrete.
Old car tyres cannot be melted and reshaped, so they are shredded into rubber crumb for playground surfaces and sports pitches.
Recycling decisions weigh energy, cost, quality and demand
- Recycling conserves finite resources, such as metal ores and crude oil, and reduces the waste sent to landfill.
- Recycling aluminium uses only about 5% of the energy needed to extract new aluminium by electrolysis, so it is very worthwhile.
- Collecting, sorting and transporting waste also use energy and cost money, which can cancel out the savings for low-value materials.
- Mixed or dirty waste, such as plastic packets with food on them, is hard to separate, so contamination can make recycling uneconomic.
- Some materials lose quality each time they are recycled, as the fibres in paper get shorter, so they can be recycled only a few times.
- Recycling needs a market for the recycled material, since collected waste that nobody buys still ends up as waste.
When a question asks you to evaluate a recycling decision, give a benefit and a drawback linked to the data, then state which one outweighs the other for that material.
- Name the four main stages of a life-cycle assessment.
- Why can two life-cycle assessments of the same product reach different conclusions?
- Why should energy values given per kilogram be converted into values per product?
- Why is recycling PET bottles into fleece clothing viable?
- Give two factors that can make recycling a material uneconomic.