32:I[196793,["/_next/static/chunks/22sb5gxku1vti.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/38-k3bl6rq3jd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2-kxf37eoeg7i.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0be1c60akah5d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3xa2z7fbv2riw.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43_c8pa0f3h7b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3zxbsyiz3sczc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0wf9roqbn_-g4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12eug9rydw8za.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2f1w4u-bu1c0g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2xb8rh55xtnv4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/15t7f4xdgo4t3.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ejt5xvpdtik0.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14ylo6o9spr8d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nv_h9rvn8nzl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3l5uu1dz3xba2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0yvahveev18z-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12_xkdi18mnhe.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/099h0ryih59qu.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0n-sa_i-ykj1k.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pm5eegg3i3no.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2hbne-_09jb6_.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pnbagih46wtg.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280"],"Gingerbread"] 34:I[647935,["/_next/static/chunks/22sb5gxku1vti.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/38-k3bl6rq3jd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2-kxf37eoeg7i.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0be1c60akah5d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3xa2z7fbv2riw.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43_c8pa0f3h7b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3zxbsyiz3sczc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0wf9roqbn_-g4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12eug9rydw8za.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2f1w4u-bu1c0g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2xb8rh55xtnv4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/15t7f4xdgo4t3.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ejt5xvpdtik0.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14ylo6o9spr8d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nv_h9rvn8nzl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3l5uu1dz3xba2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0yvahveev18z-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12_xkdi18mnhe.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/099h0ryih59qu.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0n-sa_i-ykj1k.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pm5eegg3i3no.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2hbne-_09jb6_.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pnbagih46wtg.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280"],"RecordResourceResume"] 35:I[830476,["/_next/static/chunks/22sb5gxku1vti.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/38-k3bl6rq3jd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2-kxf37eoeg7i.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0be1c60akah5d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3xa2z7fbv2riw.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43_c8pa0f3h7b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3zxbsyiz3sczc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0wf9roqbn_-g4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12eug9rydw8za.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2f1w4u-bu1c0g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2xb8rh55xtnv4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/15t7f4xdgo4t3.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ejt5xvpdtik0.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14ylo6o9spr8d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nv_h9rvn8nzl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3l5uu1dz3xba2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0yvahveev18z-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12_xkdi18mnhe.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/099h0ryih59qu.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0n-sa_i-ykj1k.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pm5eegg3i3no.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2hbne-_09jb6_.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pnbagih46wtg.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280"],"FlashcardAccessBranch"] 36:I[315438,["/_next/static/chunks/22sb5gxku1vti.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/38-k3bl6rq3jd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2-kxf37eoeg7i.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0be1c60akah5d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3xa2z7fbv2riw.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43_c8pa0f3h7b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3zxbsyiz3sczc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0wf9roqbn_-g4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12eug9rydw8za.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2f1w4u-bu1c0g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2xb8rh55xtnv4.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/15t7f4xdgo4t3.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ejt5xvpdtik0.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/14ylo6o9spr8d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nv_h9rvn8nzl.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3l5uu1dz3xba2.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0yvahveev18z-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12_xkdi18mnhe.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/099h0ryih59qu.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0n-sa_i-ykj1k.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pm5eegg3i3no.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2hbne-_09jb6_.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/1pnbagih46wtg.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790280280"],"TopicFlashcardRunner"] 23:[["$","$L32",null,{"feature":"flashcards"}],"$L33",["$","$L34",null,{"href":"/as-level/psychology/edexcel/as-research-into-privation/flashcards","label":"Research into privation","subjectCode":"as_level_psychology","surface":"flashcards"}],["$","$L35",null,{"runner":["$","div",null,{"className":"min-h-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden bg-background","children":["$","$L36",null,{"decks":[{"id":"ecb91800-9b94-4985-9a0b-cb8db69c94ef","title":"Research into privation Flashcards","topicId":"fdad8660-cd93-59f4-ab68-5ff23fdd1e5c","topicSlug":"as-research-into-privation","cards":[{"id":"b39d679d-4dfa-4466-aa92-154d92a3fabc","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What flaw did Rutter identify in Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis?","back":"Bowlby confused deprivation with privation.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Bowlby confused deprivation with privation.","correct":true,"explanation":"Rutter argued that Bowlby failed to distinguish losing an existing attachment, which is deprivation, from never forming an attachment at all, which is privation."},{"text":"Bowlby exaggerated the role of privation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rutter’s criticism concerned a conceptual confusion, not an exaggeration of privation’s importance. Bowlby confused deprivation, where an attachment is broken, with privation, where none forms."},{"text":"Bowlby confused deprivation with institutionalisation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Institutionalisation is a form of care that may cause privation, but it was not the distinction Rutter highlighted. Bowlby confused deprivation with privation."},{"text":"Bowlby underestimated the effects of deprivation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rutter did not argue that Bowlby underestimated deprivation. He argued that Bowlby wrongly treated deprivation and privation as though they were the same experience."}]},{"id":"98f3dc49-c022-4295-ad9c-0b413d03321b","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"In deprivation, an attachment is [ ]; in privation, an attachment [ ].","back":"In deprivation, an attachment is formed then broken; in privation, an attachment never forms.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"In deprivation, an attachment is formed then broken; in privation, an attachment never forms.","correct":true,"explanation":"Deprivation means losing an attachment that has already developed, whereas privation means that the child has never formed an attachment in the first place."},{"text":"In deprivation, an attachment is formed then weakened; in privation, an attachment never breaks.","correct":false,"explanation":"Deprivation involves an attachment being formed and then broken, not merely weakened. Privation means an attachment never forms, rather than forming and never breaking."},{"text":"In deprivation, an attachment is never formed; in privation, an attachment forms then breaks.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the two concepts. In deprivation an attachment is formed then broken, while in privation an attachment never forms at all."},{"text":"In deprivation, an attachment is formed then broken; in privation, an attachment forms only briefly.","correct":false,"explanation":"The description of deprivation is accurate, but privation does not involve a brief attachment. In privation, an attachment never forms in the first place."}]},{"id":"c2ac199e-d271-4f4e-ab03-c9d18e55897a","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which is linked to the most severe long-lasting damage: deprivation or privation?","back":"Privation.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Privation.","correct":true,"explanation":"Privation is associated with the most severe long-lasting damage because the child never forms an initial attachment, potentially disrupting emotional, social and intellectual development."},{"text":"Deprivation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Deprivation can cause harmful effects, but an attachment existed before it was broken. Privation is linked to more severe long-lasting damage because no attachment ever formed."},{"text":"Brief separation.","correct":false,"explanation":"A brief separation may cause temporary distress but is not usually linked to the most severe lasting damage. Privation presents the greater developmental risk."},{"text":"Repeated separation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Repeated separation may disrupt attachment, but it does not necessarily prevent attachment formation altogether. Privation is linked to the most severe long-lasting developmental damage."}]},{"id":"fd81e863-f9b0-4e89-98b8-5444a65ca990","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why must privation research rely on natural experiments and case studies?","back":"Deliberately isolating children would be unethical.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Deliberately isolating children would be unethical.","correct":true,"explanation":"Researchers cannot intentionally prevent children from forming attachments because this risks serious psychological harm. They must therefore study naturally occurring cases using natural experiments or case studies."},{"text":"Deliberately isolating children would be methodologically invalid.","correct":false,"explanation":"The decisive problem is ethical rather than methodological. Researchers cannot intentionally expose children to potentially severe harm, so they investigate naturally occurring privation instead."},{"text":"Deliberately isolating children would be too time-consuming.","correct":false,"explanation":"The length of the research is not the fundamental barrier. Intentionally isolating children could cause serious developmental harm and would therefore be unethical."},{"text":"Deliberately isolating children would be scientifically unnecessary.","correct":false,"explanation":"Such research could provide scientific information, but that does not make it permissible. Deliberately causing privation would be unethical because of the likely harm to children."}]},{"id":"b8708ea3-e4fc-4953-be32-c1fd0aa14f28","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What was the verdict on the Czech twins’ recovery?","back":"The effects of severe privation were fully reversed.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The effects of severe privation were fully reversed.","correct":true,"explanation":"After receiving loving care from two sisters, the Czech twins developed normal language, intelligence and social relationships, indicating that the effects of their privation were fully reversed."},{"text":"The effects of severe privation were partly reversed.","correct":false,"explanation":"This understates the twins’ recovery. Their later language, intellectual and social development was reported as normal, supporting the conclusion that the effects were fully reversed."},{"text":"The effects of severe privation were not reversed.","correct":false,"explanation":"The twins did not remain permanently impaired. After moving into a loving environment, they recovered remarkably well, so the effects of their severe privation were fully reversed."},{"text":"The effects of severe privation were only temporarily reversed.","correct":false,"explanation":"There was no reported return of the twins’ early severe difficulties. Their sustained normal development led researchers to conclude that the effects were fully reversed."}]},{"id":"9b0f101c-0091-46a4-b658-96d6faad70c5","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Genie was discovered aged [ ] after being confined from [ ].","back":"Genie was discovered aged 13 after being confined from 20 months old.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Genie was discovered aged 13 after being confined from 20 months old.","correct":true,"explanation":"Genie was found at age 13 after experiencing extreme confinement and social isolation from approximately 20 months old, covering most of her early development."},{"text":"Genie was discovered aged 12 after being confined from 20 months old.","correct":false,"explanation":"This gives the discovery age one year too early. Genie had been confined from about 20 months old and was discovered when she was 13."},{"text":"Genie was discovered aged 13 after being confined from birth.","correct":false,"explanation":"Genie was discovered at 13, but her severe confinement did not begin at birth. It began when she was approximately 20 months old."},{"text":"Genie was discovered aged 12 after being confined from 18 months old.","correct":false,"explanation":"Both ages are inaccurate, reflecting near-miss recall of the case details. Genie was confined from approximately 20 months old and discovered aged 13."}]},{"id":"d3b39ec8-a47d-4113-8ed3-6f7dde554180","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which aspect of language did Genie never master?","back":"Grammar or syntax.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Grammar or syntax.","correct":true,"explanation":"Although Genie learned many words, she never developed normal grammar or syntax. This has been used as evidence for a critical period in language development."},{"text":"Vocabulary or word meanings.","correct":false,"explanation":"Genie was able to acquire vocabulary and learn the meanings of many words. Her persistent difficulty was combining words according to normal grammar or syntax."},{"text":"Speech or pronunciation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although Genie’s spoken language remained unusual, the key aspect she never mastered was grammar or syntax, rather than simply producing or pronouncing words."},{"text":"Non-verbal communication.","correct":false,"explanation":"Genie could communicate through gestures and other non-verbal behaviour. Her major lasting language deficit involved grammar or syntax, which never developed normally."}]},{"id":"f9950a73-5bc1-474d-bdea-788f30ece94a","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The Czech twins’ privation was [ ], but Genie’s was [ ].","back":"The Czech twins’ privation was fully reversed, but Genie’s was not fully reversed.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Czech twins’ privation was fully reversed, but Genie’s was not fully reversed.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Czech twins achieved apparently normal development after receiving loving care, whereas Genie retained serious language and social difficulties despite intervention, so her recovery was incomplete."},{"text":"The Czech twins’ privation was partly reversed, but Genie’s was not fully reversed.","correct":false,"explanation":"Genie’s recovery was indeed incomplete, but the Czech twins were judged to have recovered fully, developing normal intellectual, linguistic and social abilities."},{"text":"The Czech twins’ privation was fully reversed, but Genie’s was fully reversed.","correct":false,"explanation":"The twins’ recovery was considered complete, but Genie continued to experience severe difficulties, particularly with grammar and social development. Her privation was not fully reversed."},{"text":"The Czech twins’ privation was not fully reversed, but Genie’s was fully reversed.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the findings of the two cases. The Czech twins’ effects were fully reversed, whereas Genie retained lasting developmental difficulties and did not recover fully."}]},{"id":"deb3dea6-be28-4ed2-9ff2-2a07f522c05c","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why may having each other have protected the Czech twins?","back":"They could form a primitive attachment bond.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They could form a primitive attachment bond.","correct":true,"explanation":"Their relationship provided an opportunity to develop a basic emotional bond with one another, partially protecting them from the most severe effects of complete attachment deprivation."},{"text":"They could form a secure maternal attachment bond.","correct":false,"explanation":"The twins did not receive consistent sensitive care from an adult caregiver. The protective factor was that they could form a primitive attachment bond with each other."},{"text":"They could develop complete emotional independence.","correct":false,"explanation":"Their protection did not come from becoming emotionally self-sufficient. Having each other allowed them to form a primitive attachment bond despite their severe social isolation."},{"text":"They could develop normal peer relationships.","correct":false,"explanation":"The twins lacked normal opportunities to interact with a wider peer group. Their mutual primitive attachment bond, rather than ordinary peer socialisation, offered some protection."}]},{"id":"5a21de45-28e1-4e7b-a18a-66a0d191b677","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What orphanage condition caused privation in Romania?","back":"Very low staff-to-child ratios limited attention, comfort and stimulation.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Very low staff-to-child ratios limited attention, comfort and stimulation.","correct":true,"explanation":"With very few staff caring for many children, each child received little individual attention, emotional comfort or stimulation, creating conditions associated with privation."},{"text":"Very high staff-to-child ratios increased attention, comfort and stimulation.","correct":false,"explanation":"A high staff-to-child ratio would allow more individual care rather than cause privation. Romanian orphanages had very low ratios, severely limiting attention, comfort and stimulation."},{"text":"Consistent one-to-one caregiving provided attention, comfort and stimulation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Consistent one-to-one care would encourage attachment formation rather than prevent it. Privation arose because very low staff-to-child ratios restricted individual attention, comfort and stimulation."},{"text":"Frequent responsive interaction provided attention, comfort and stimulation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Regular responsive interaction supports cognitive and emotional development, so it would not explain privation. Very low staff-to-child ratios instead limited attention, comfort and stimulation."}]},{"id":"701fdf36-2426-4016-a73d-7409aceb7c19","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What type of study was Rutter’s English and Romanian Adoptees study?","back":"A longitudinal study.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A longitudinal study.","correct":true,"explanation":"The researchers repeatedly assessed the adoptees as they grew older, allowing developmental outcomes to be tracked over an extended period, which defines a longitudinal study."},{"text":"A cross-sectional study.","correct":false,"explanation":"A cross-sectional study compares different groups at one point in time. Rutter’s team followed the same adoptees over time, making this a longitudinal study."},{"text":"A laboratory experiment.","correct":false,"explanation":"The researchers did not manipulate adoption or institutional deprivation, so this was not a laboratory experiment. Repeated assessments of the adoptees made it a longitudinal study."},{"text":"A single case study.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although the research concerned children from unusual circumstances, its repeated measurement of a large group over time means it is classified as a longitudinal study."}]},{"id":"391733d1-193b-4eea-b13b-b76bffee8bfa","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The ERA study tracked [ ] and used [ ] as a control group.","back":"The ERA study tracked 165 Romanian orphans and used 52 British adoptees as a control group.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The ERA study tracked 165 Romanian orphans and used 52 British adoptees as a control group.","correct":true,"explanation":"The researchers followed 165 Romanian orphans after adoption and compared their development with 52 British children adopted within the UK."},{"text":"The ERA study tracked 111 Romanian orphans and used 52 British adoptees as a control group.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses the Romanian sample with another figure. The study tracked 165 Romanian orphans, while retaining 52 British adoptees as its control group."},{"text":"The ERA study tracked 165 Romanian orphans and used 111 British adoptees as a control group.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Romanian sample size is accurate, but the British control group contained 52 adoptees, not 111. These groups enabled outcomes following institutional deprivation to be compared."},{"text":"The ERA study tracked 52 Romanian orphans and used 165 British adoptees as a control group.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the two sample sizes. The ERA study followed 165 Romanian orphans and compared them with a smaller control group of 52 British adoptees."}]},{"id":"015abfe5-a406-49a9-80f4-2992fe1a616c","cardType":"basic","points":3,"front":"How were Romanian adoptees grouped in the ERA study?","back":"

Before 6 months
6 months to 2 years
After 2 years

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Before 6 months
6 months to 2 years
After 2 years

","correct":true,"explanation":"The adoptees were grouped by whether adoption occurred before 6 months, from 6 months to 2 years, or after 2 years to examine duration effects."},{"text":"

Before 12 months
12 months to 2 years
After 2 years

","correct":false,"explanation":"These boundaries shift the crucial early threshold from 6 to 12 months. The ERA groups were before 6 months, 6 months to 2 years, and after 2 years."},{"text":"

Before 1 year
1 year to 3 years
After 3 years

","correct":false,"explanation":"The study did not divide children into yearly intervals ending at age 3. Its categories used 6 months and 2 years as the key boundaries."},{"text":"

Before 6 months
6 months to 1 year
After 1 year

","correct":false,"explanation":"This incorrectly uses 6-month intervals throughout. Only the first boundary was 6 months; the middle group extended from 6 months to 2 years."}]},{"id":"095609ed-d560-4a0d-acda-f8b75606fa78","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"In the ERA study, adoption before 6 months led to average IQ [ ] by age 11; adoption after 2 years led to average IQ [ ].","back":"In the ERA study, adoption before 6 months led to average IQ 102 by age 11; adoption after 2 years led to average IQ 77.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"In the ERA study, adoption before 6 months led to average IQ 102 by age 11; adoption after 2 years led to average IQ 77.","correct":true,"explanation":"Children adopted before 6 months showed substantial cognitive recovery, averaging 102 at age 11, whereas those adopted after 2 years averaged only 77."},{"text":"In the ERA study, adoption before 6 months led to average IQ 102 by age 11; adoption after 2 years led to average IQ 85.","correct":false,"explanation":"The later-adopted group’s average was 77, not 85. Prolonged institutional deprivation was associated with a substantially lower average IQ despite adoption into supportive families."},{"text":"In the ERA study, adoption before 6 months led to average IQ 90 by age 11; adoption after 2 years led to average IQ 77.","correct":false,"explanation":"The early-adopted group achieved an average IQ of 102, not 90, indicating considerable recovery when deprivation ended before 6 months; the later group averaged 77."},{"text":"In the ERA study, adoption before 6 months led to average IQ 77 by age 11; adoption after 2 years led to average IQ 102.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the group averages. Children adopted before 6 months averaged 102, while children whose institutional deprivation continued beyond 2 years averaged 77."}]},{"id":"4d2bd1c1-0040-4e32-84c7-5180754c99a2","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which attachment style was common after adoption later than 6 months?","back":"Disinhibited attachment.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Disinhibited attachment.","correct":true,"explanation":"Children adopted after 6 months commonly showed disinhibited attachment, including indiscriminate friendliness towards unfamiliar adults and limited preference for particular attachment figures."},{"text":"Secure attachment.","correct":false,"explanation":"Secure attachment involves trusting but selective relationships with caregivers. Later-adopted Romanian children more commonly displayed disinhibited attachment, showing excessive familiarity with unfamiliar adults."},{"text":"Insecure-avoidant attachment.","correct":false,"explanation":"Insecure-avoidant children minimise contact with their caregiver, whereas the notable pattern among later-adopted Romanian children was disinhibited attachment and indiscriminate sociability."},{"text":"Insecure-resistant attachment.","correct":false,"explanation":"Insecure-resistant attachment involves clinginess and difficulty being comforted by a caregiver. The characteristic outcome after later adoption was instead disinhibited attachment."}]},{"id":"d78244cd-dd0a-42c4-b44d-b5fd0cc142db","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Disinhibited attachment involves [ ] and [ ].","back":"Disinhibited attachment involves inappropriate familiarity with unfamiliar adults and lack of selective attachments.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Disinhibited attachment involves inappropriate familiarity with unfamiliar adults and lack of selective attachments.","correct":true,"explanation":"Disinhibited attachment is marked by excessive familiarity with strangers and failure to show the usual strong preference for specific attachment figures."},{"text":"Disinhibited attachment involves intense fear of unfamiliar adults and lack of selective attachments.","correct":false,"explanation":"Fear of unfamiliar adults is the opposite of the indiscriminate friendliness characteristic of disinhibited attachment. It involves inappropriate familiarity with unfamiliar adults and a lack of selective attachments."},{"text":"Disinhibited attachment involves inappropriate familiarity with unfamiliar adults and strong preference for one caregiver.","correct":false,"explanation":"A strong preference for one caregiver demonstrates selectivity, which is absent in disinhibited attachment. The pattern combines inappropriate familiarity with unfamiliar adults and lack of selective attachments."},{"text":"Disinhibited attachment involves avoidance of unfamiliar adults and highly selective attachments.","correct":false,"explanation":"Avoidance of unfamiliar adults and highly selective bonds contradict disinhibited attachment. Affected children instead show inappropriate familiarity with unfamiliar adults and lack selective attachments."}]},{"id":"d104333f-aae9-4cf0-934c-fedc34b3eec3","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What did the 6-month threshold show about recovery from privation?","back":"Intervention before 6 months made complete recovery highly likely.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Intervention before 6 months made complete recovery highly likely.","correct":true,"explanation":"Evidence from severely deprived children indicated that intervention within the first six months offered a sensitive window in which normal attachment and development could still be achieved."},{"text":"Intervention after 6 months made complete recovery highly likely.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the timing effect: prolonged privation beyond six months reduced the likelihood of full recovery. Intervention before six months made complete recovery highly likely."},{"text":"Intervention before 12 months made complete recovery highly likely.","correct":false,"explanation":"This extends the effective intervention window too far. Findings suggested a threshold of six months, with intervention before that point making complete recovery highly likely."},{"text":"Intervention before 6 months made complete recovery highly unlikely.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the outcome associated with early intervention. Receiving suitable care before six months was linked to a high likelihood of complete recovery from privation."}]},{"id":"657734e1-954b-47f1-80e5-39064a143df7","cardType":"basic","points":3,"front":"How did subsequent care differ for the Czech twins versus Genie?","back":"

Czech twins: stable, loving foster care.
Genie: unstable and abusive placements.

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Czech twins: stable, loving foster care.
Genie: unstable and abusive placements.

","correct":true,"explanation":"The twins received consistent affection and security in foster care, whereas Genie experienced further instability and mistreatment. This contrast may help explain their different levels of recovery."},{"text":"

Czech twins: unstable and abusive placements.
Genie: stable, loving foster care.

","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the children’s subsequent experiences. The Czech twins entered stable, loving foster care, while Genie experienced unstable and abusive placements that hindered recovery."},{"text":"

Czech twins: stable, loving foster care.
Genie: stable and loving foster care.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Genie did not receive the same consistently supportive care as the twins. The twins had stable, loving foster care, but Genie underwent unstable and abusive placements."},{"text":"

Czech twins: neglectful institutional care.
Genie: unstable and abusive placements.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The twins were not returned to neglectful institutional care. They received stable, loving foster care, whereas Genie’s later placements remained unstable and sometimes abusive."}]},{"id":"c9695c99-0c61-4d5b-a7dc-22c518e4da9a","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why is a longitudinal design useful for studying privation reversal?","back":"It tracks long-term developmental trajectories, not brief snapshots.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It tracks long-term developmental trajectories, not brief snapshots.","correct":true,"explanation":"Following the same individuals over an extended period reveals whether recovery is maintained and how development changes, rather than recording behaviour at only one moment."},{"text":"It tracks short-term behavioural responses, not long-term change.","correct":false,"explanation":"Immediate responses provide only a snapshot and cannot reveal sustained recovery. A longitudinal design is valuable because it tracks long-term developmental trajectories over time."},{"text":"It compares different age groups simultaneously, not the same people.","correct":false,"explanation":"Comparing age groups at one time is a cross-sectional design. Longitudinal research repeatedly follows the same participants to identify their long-term developmental trajectories."},{"text":"It establishes cause and effect conclusively, not mere correlations.","correct":false,"explanation":"Longitudinal observation alone cannot establish causation conclusively because variables are not experimentally controlled. Its value is in tracking long-term developmental trajectories rather than brief snapshots."}]},{"id":"f3725247-a38d-45b4-9178-ce06f3a1990f","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why are privation case studies hard to generalise?","back":"They involve unique individuals in extreme circumstances.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They involve unique individuals in extreme circumstances.","correct":true,"explanation":"Each case combines an unusual person, history and environment, so findings may not apply to typical children or even to other individuals who have experienced privation."},{"text":"They involve large representative samples in ordinary circumstances.","correct":false,"explanation":"Large, representative samples would normally improve generalisability rather than limit it. Privation case studies are difficult to generalise because they concern unique individuals in extreme circumstances."},{"text":"They use standardised procedures across many participants.","correct":false,"explanation":"Standardised research involving many participants would support broader comparison. Privation case studies instead focus on unique individuals whose extreme circumstances may not represent others."},{"text":"They randomly select large samples from the general population.","correct":false,"explanation":"Random selection from the general population would increase population validity. Privation cases are hard to generalise because their participants and experiences are exceptionally unusual."}]},{"id":"2dbfdcdd-1d15-47ce-bafd-cbe0b911ad3c","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How can attrition bias longitudinal privation studies?","back":"Participant drop-out may leave a more stable or successful sample.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Participant drop-out may leave a more stable or successful sample.","correct":true,"explanation":"Participants with continuing difficulties may be more likely to leave, so the remaining group can appear unusually stable or successful and exaggerate recovery rates."},{"text":"Participant drop-out may create a larger and more representative sample.","correct":false,"explanation":"Losing participants reduces sample size and usually weakens representativeness rather than improving it. Selective drop-out may leave a more stable or successful sample behind."},{"text":"Participant drop-out may ensure a perfectly random and unbiased sample.","correct":false,"explanation":"Attrition is often systematic rather than random, as less stable participants may be likelier to leave. The remaining sample may therefore appear more stable or successful."},{"text":"Participant drop-out may convert the study into a controlled laboratory experiment.","correct":false,"explanation":"Attrition changes the composition of a sample; it does not introduce experimental control. It may bias findings by leaving a more stable or successful group."}]},{"id":"7d78e7d6-866e-458c-82c6-6f7d20c35e48","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What ethical conflict affected Genie’s research?","back":"Scientific value conflicted with her therapeutic needs.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Scientific value conflicted with her therapeutic needs.","correct":true,"explanation":"Researchers wanted to gain knowledge from Genie’s rare case, but intensive investigation risked treating her as a research subject rather than prioritising her care and recovery."},{"text":"Random allocation conflicted with her informed consent.","correct":false,"explanation":"Genie was not assigned randomly to conditions, so random allocation was not the central conflict. The ethical tension concerned scientific value competing with her therapeutic needs."},{"text":"Research funding conflicted with her educational timetable.","correct":false,"explanation":"Scheduling research around education was not the defining ethical issue. Researchers faced a conflict between obtaining scientifically valuable evidence and prioritising Genie’s therapeutic needs."},{"text":"Laboratory control conflicted with her genetic privacy.","correct":false,"explanation":"The case did not centre on protecting genetic information from laboratory procedures. Its major ethical conflict was between the research’s scientific value and Genie’s therapeutic welfare."}]},{"id":"927077bb-6400-421a-b56d-837230e4b5a9","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Children’s homes now use a [ ], where one or two carers form a [ ] with a child.","back":"Children’s homes now use a key-worker system, where one or two carers form a primary emotional bond with a child.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Children’s homes now use a key-worker system, where one or two carers form a primary emotional bond with a child.","correct":true,"explanation":"A key-worker system gives a child one or two consistent carers, enabling a primary emotional bond to develop despite the wider institutional environment."},{"text":"Children’s homes now use a shift-rotation system, where one or two carers form a primary emotional bond with a child.","correct":false,"explanation":"Rotating carers would reduce consistency and make attachment more difficult. Children’s homes use a key-worker system so one or two carers can form a primary emotional bond."},{"text":"Children’s homes now use a key-worker system, where one or two carers form a temporary professional relationship with a child.","correct":false,"explanation":"The aim is not merely a temporary professional relationship but a consistent primary emotional bond. A key-worker system provides one or two carers who can establish that attachment."},{"text":"Children’s homes now use a peer-care system, where one or two carers form a group social bond with a child.","correct":false,"explanation":"Peers do not fulfil the designated caregiving role described here, and a general social bond is insufficient. A key-worker system supports a primary emotional bond with consistent carers."}]}]}],"examCountdown":{"examDate":"2027-05-10","paperLabel":"Paper 1"},"heading":"Research into privation","title":"Research into privation Flashcards","topbar":{"backHref":"/as-level/psychology/edexcel/flashcards"},"topicSidebar":"$L37"}]}],"topicId":"fdad8660-cd93-59f4-ab68-5ff23fdd1e5c","walled":"$L38"}],"$L39","$L3a"]