34:I[196793,["/_next/static/chunks/32obbi_gchwr8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2ore96sfyq5-v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468"],"Gingerbread"] 36:I[647935,["/_next/static/chunks/32obbi_gchwr8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2ore96sfyq5-v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468"],"RecordResourceResume"] 37:I[830476,["/_next/static/chunks/32obbi_gchwr8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2ore96sfyq5-v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468"],"FlashcardAccessBranch"] 38:I[315438,["/_next/static/chunks/32obbi_gchwr8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2_6olli-sutu3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1qp4g--o6-1vf.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0psy-n5us57a4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3mz725-y91ph6.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2x_dbpl3b_l2r.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0nojijad0occ8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/19ua1o9n5v3ho.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3yfg2hrj9oxbd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/35s1d7gs3nyqk.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/38w1x0vrld4-w.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3kzt2piec6aoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2lsi6eli88uwt.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36r9y5g_s4k64.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/40lyu17d590zu.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2g-t2n9ahs3tn.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2mv9l1xl_aa4j.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/44w2c3xxfw4wd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/16jtsbm2g52s0.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/05mo4k9k-ry1n.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2eanemqjnv2vr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2f3ohq_f1uov2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0qeo40bqomvxa.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1coblm1-go81_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/27ftpb6yvr6lz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2ore96sfyq5-v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3it1o0ex-l5qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2gqripb6ybmw9.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2l63yczi1z2qz.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/075i0tnxt4not.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1eyu-5752jh17.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1of_-ow2iz1cj.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3ybwgs28on6c8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/13gj59kzq50t_.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1986062z5zb0v.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0uitbylhcd4am.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0wv8cpdr6cvhr.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/06b61oz__qen3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a4x2f2g83l7b.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/3q5gc8lbwr4b4.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0dspbdeiizrn3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2yss1g0cimuwe.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0e7v08pdxbxe2.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/36nndwkz7iik3.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/2fnth9-t6i7kd.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/24srd-xd1m5z8.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/0a57o9qvnv-nb.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/41hx021qkamew.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1791951468"],"TopicFlashcardRunner"] 25:[["$","$L34",null,{"feature":"flashcards"}],"$L35",["$","$L36",null,{"href":"/as-level/history/ocr/as-liberals-conservatives-and-the-rise-of-labour-1846-1918/flashcards","label":"Liberals, Conservatives and the Rise of Labour 1846–1918","subjectCode":"as_level_history__ocr","surface":"flashcards"}],["$","$L37",null,{"runner":["$","div",null,{"className":"min-h-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden bg-background","children":["$","$L38",null,{"decks":[{"id":"f6e23a50-88e6-4477-98ff-dcd20ec9444c","title":"Liberals, Conservatives and the Rise of Labour 1846–1918 Flashcards","topicId":"2532579f-5404-5b50-9138-dbf37bf0e24b","topicSlug":"as-liberals-conservatives-and-the-rise-of-labour-1846-1918","cards":[{"id":"aca3a748-a0a6-4c94-b00e-4dd79e37b36e","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which 1846 decision reshaped party politics?","back":"The repeal of the Corn Laws.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The repeal of the Corn Laws.","correct":true,"explanation":"Peel’s government repealed the Corn Laws in 1846, ending long-standing protection for British agriculture and splitting the Conservative Party between free traders and protectionists."},{"text":"The First Reform Act.","correct":false,"explanation":"The First Reform Act expanded representation in 1832, but it did not reshape party politics in 1846. The decisive event was the repeal of the Corn Laws."},{"text":"The Second Reform Act.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Second Reform Act extended the borough franchise in 1867, two decades later. The 1846 decision that transformed party politics was the repeal of the Corn Laws."},{"text":"The Parliament Act.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Parliament Act limited the Lords’ veto in 1911, much later than the key 1846 realignment. Party politics was reshaped in 1846 by repealing the Corn Laws."}]},{"id":"0ded8d88-0f5d-4624-a784-73c6a693d1fa","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Corn Law repeal split the Conservatives?","back":"It separated free-trade Peelites from protectionist Conservatives.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It separated free-trade Peelites from protectionist Conservatives.","correct":true,"explanation":"Repeal split Conservatives because Peel and his supporters backed free trade, while most Conservatives defended agricultural protection, creating the separate Peelite group."},{"text":"It united free-trade Peelites with protectionist Conservatives.","correct":false,"explanation":"Repeal did not unite these groups; it exposed their conflicting economic principles. The decision separated free-trade Peelites from protectionist Conservatives and weakened the party."},{"text":"It separated Radicals from protectionist Conservatives.","correct":false,"explanation":"Radicals were already a wider reform movement rather than the specific Conservative faction created by the split. Repeal separated free-trade Peelites from protectionist Conservatives."},{"text":"It divided protectionist Peelites from free-trade Conservatives.","correct":false,"explanation":"The labels and positions are reversed here: Peelites were the free-trade group, while the remaining Conservatives were mainly protectionist. Repeal separated free-trade Peelites from them."}]},{"id":"df3836d6-798a-4f3e-b34b-28f0c2d31f87","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"In [ ], Whigs, Peelites and Radicals united against Derby, marking the emergence of the [ ].","back":"In 1859, Whigs, Peelites and Radicals united against Derby, marking the emergence of the Liberal Party.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"In 1859, Whigs, Peelites and Radicals united against Derby, marking the emergence of the Liberal Party.","correct":true,"explanation":"In 1859, these anti-Conservative groups united against Derby’s government, forming the political alignment that became the Liberal Party."},{"text":"In 1852, Whigs, Peelites and Radicals united against Derby, marking the emergence of the Liberal Party.","correct":false,"explanation":"The coalition did not unite in 1852; the key alliance formed in 1859. That 1859 union of Whigs, Peelites and Radicals marked the emergence of the Liberal Party."},{"text":"In 1859, Whigs, Peelites and Radicals united against Derby, marking the emergence of the Conservative Party.","correct":false,"explanation":"The groups united against Derby to create a new Liberal alignment, not the Conservative Party. The correct conclusion is the emergence of the Liberal Party in 1859."},{"text":"In 1867, Whigs, Peelites and Radicals united against Derby, marking the emergence of the Liberal Party.","correct":false,"explanation":"By 1867 the Liberal Party had already emerged, and Derby was no longer the immediate context for its formation. The decisive union occurred in 1859."}]},{"id":"d66a43ab-3ba5-48c2-bb25-bc831a86b839","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which budgetary ideal was central to Gladstonian Liberalism?","back":"A balanced budget.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A balanced budget.","correct":true,"explanation":"Gladstonian Liberalism valued financial prudence, aiming for a balanced budget in which government spending was matched by revenue and borrowing was kept to a minimum."},{"text":"A permanent budget deficit.","correct":false,"explanation":"Gladstone opposed routine deficit financing because it conflicted with financial discipline. The central ideal was a balanced budget, supported by careful control of public spending."},{"text":"A protective tariff system.","correct":false,"explanation":"Protective tariffs conflicted with Gladstonian free-trade principles and were associated more closely with Conservative protectionism. Gladstonian Liberalism centred on the ideal of a balanced budget."},{"text":"A large military budget.","correct":false,"explanation":"Gladstonian Liberalism generally stressed economy in government and resisted unnecessary expenditure, including military spending. Its central budgetary ideal was balance between revenue and expenditure."}]},{"id":"2c7653f8-614f-4f7d-83f5-5531d9bc8422","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did the Second Reform Act 1867 extend?","back":"The borough franchise to many urban working-class householders.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The borough franchise to many urban working-class householders.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Second Reform Act extended the vote in boroughs to many urban working-class householders, significantly enlarging the electorate in towns and cities."},{"text":"The county franchise to many rural agricultural labourers.","correct":false,"explanation":"The 1867 Act primarily expanded the borough franchise, not the county franchise. The later 1884 reform extended similar principles to many county voters."},{"text":"The borough franchise to all women householders.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Act enfranchised many male urban householders, not women. Women did not receive the parliamentary vote on equal terms until the Representation of the People Act 1928."},{"text":"The university franchise to many urban working-class householders.","correct":false,"explanation":"University seats concerned graduates and were not the main target of the 1867 reform. The Act extended the borough franchise to many urban working-class householders."}]},{"id":"5b9b82a4-00c2-41ff-b3e8-28b0cad70c8b","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Disraeli support reform in 1867?","back":"

To outmanoeuvre the Liberals.
To show Conservatives could manage constitutional change.

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

To outmanoeuvre the Liberals.
To show Conservatives could manage constitutional change.

","correct":true,"explanation":"Disraeli supported reform to wrong-foot the Liberals politically and demonstrate that Conservatives could safely control and lead constitutional change."},{"text":"

To strengthen the Liberals.
To show Conservatives opposed constitutional change.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Disraeli’s aim was the opposite: to outmanoeuvre the Liberals and prove Conservatives could manage constitutional change rather than simply resist it."},{"text":"

To outmanoeuvre the Liberals.
To show Conservatives could restore aristocratic privilege.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Reform was intended to present Conservatism as adaptable, not to restore privilege. Disraeli wanted to outmanoeuvre the Liberals and show Conservatives could manage constitutional change."},{"text":"

To appease protectionists.
To show Conservatives could manage industrial unrest.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The reform’s main purpose was political and constitutional, not preserving protectionism or managing industrial unrest. Disraeli aimed to outmanoeuvre the Liberals and lead constitutional change."}]},{"id":"4c83bafc-cc53-4f2d-bd3e-8317e12b93c6","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"[ ] presented Conservatives as guardians of the whole nation while accepting [ ].","back":"One Nation Conservatism presented Conservatives as guardians of the whole nation while accepting some reform.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"One Nation Conservatism presented Conservatives as guardians of the whole nation while accepting some reform.","correct":true,"explanation":"One Nation Conservatism sought to unite social classes by presenting Conservatives as defenders of the whole nation while accepting limited reform to preserve stability."},{"text":"Conservative paternalism presented Conservatives as guardians of the whole nation while accepting universal equality.","correct":false,"explanation":"The phrase and policy are too broad: One Nation Conservatism accepted some reform, not complete social equality. It presented Conservatives as national guardians across class divisions."},{"text":"One Nation Conservatism presented Conservatives as guardians of the whole nation while rejecting all reform.","correct":false,"explanation":"One Nation Conservatism was adaptable rather than wholly reactionary. It presented Conservatives as national guardians while accepting some reform to reduce conflict and preserve order."},{"text":"Free-trade Liberalism presented Conservatives as guardians of the whole nation while accepting some reform.","correct":false,"explanation":"Free-trade Liberalism was a Liberal ideology, not the Conservative approach described here. The correct term is One Nation Conservatism, which accepted some reform."}]},{"id":"9ffee181-7270-438e-b4a6-a63db5a239ae","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did the 1884-1885 reform acts affect party organisation?","back":"A bigger, redrawn electorate made party organisation more important.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A bigger, redrawn electorate made party organisation more important.","correct":true,"explanation":"The reforms enlarged and redistributed the electorate, making local associations, canvassing, registration and disciplined party organisation increasingly important for winning elections."},{"text":"A bigger, redrawn electorate made party organisation less important.","correct":false,"explanation":"A larger electorate required more mobilisation, not less. The reforms made party organisation more important because parties had to register, canvass and persuade many more voters."},{"text":"A smaller, redrawn electorate made party organisation more important.","correct":false,"explanation":"The reforms expanded rather than reduced the electorate. This larger, redrawn electorate increased the importance of party organisation and local electoral machinery."},{"text":"A bigger, unchanged electorate made party organisation more important.","correct":false,"explanation":"The electorate was not merely bigger; constituencies were also redistributed and redrawn. These changes together made party organisation more important in modern electoral competition."}]},{"id":"3fa0a719-38f9-48b6-b889-5c3ed80b0a5e","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What issue caused the Liberal split of 1886?","back":"Gladstone’s First Home Rule Bill for Ireland.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Gladstone’s First Home Rule Bill for Ireland.","correct":true,"explanation":"Gladstone’s proposal to establish an Irish legislature divided the Liberals. Opponents broke away as Liberal Unionists, believing Home Rule threatened the unity of the United Kingdom."},{"text":"Gladstone’s Irish Land Act for Ireland.","correct":false,"explanation":"Gladstone’s land legislation addressed tenant rights but did not cause the decisive 1886 split. The division arose over his First Home Rule Bill and its proposed Irish legislature."},{"text":"Gladstone’s Newcastle Programme for Britain.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Newcastle Programme set out later Liberal reforms rather than causing the 1886 division. Gladstone’s First Home Rule Bill split supporters of Irish self-government from Liberal Unionists."},{"text":"Gladstone’s Second Home Rule Bill for Ireland.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Second Home Rule Bill was introduced in 1893, after the party had already divided. The original split occurred over Gladstone’s First Home Rule Bill in 1886."}]},{"id":"6cf0baeb-427f-4fa8-b95e-7d14d95788f1","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What stance defined the Liberal Unionists?","back":"They opposed Home Rule and worked increasingly with Conservatives.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They opposed Home Rule and worked increasingly with Conservatives.","correct":true,"explanation":"Liberal Unionists believed Irish Home Rule endangered the Union. This shared commitment to unionism brought them into increasingly close electoral and governmental cooperation with the Conservatives."},{"text":"They supported Home Rule and worked increasingly with Conservatives.","correct":false,"explanation":"Supporting Home Rule would contradict the movement’s defining unionism. Liberal Unionists opposed Gladstone’s proposal and consequently developed an increasingly close alliance with the Conservatives."},{"text":"They opposed Home Rule and worked increasingly with Irish Nationalists.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although they opposed Home Rule, Liberal Unionists did not ally with the Irish Nationalists who demanded it. They instead worked increasingly closely with the Conservatives."},{"text":"They supported Home Rule and worked increasingly with Irish Nationalists.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Liberal Unionists with supporters of Irish self-government. Liberal Unionists opposed Home Rule and moved towards cooperation and eventual fusion with the Conservatives."}]},{"id":"d90ace1d-6610-47cb-8dc5-2d0b71cda912","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What alliance underpinned Salisbury’s ministries, 1885-1902?","back":"Conservative and Liberal Unionist strength.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Conservative and Liberal Unionist strength.","correct":true,"explanation":"Salisbury’s governments rested on Conservative support reinforced by Liberal Unionists, whose opposition to Irish Home Rule made them dependable allies against Gladstone’s Liberals."},{"text":"Conservative and Irish Nationalist strength.","correct":false,"explanation":"Irish Nationalists generally supported Home Rule and therefore opposed Salisbury’s unionist position. His ministries instead depended on Conservative and Liberal Unionist strength."},{"text":"Liberal and Irish Nationalist strength.","correct":false,"explanation":"Liberals and Irish Nationalists cooperated over Home Rule under Gladstone, not Salisbury. Salisbury’s ministries were underpinned by Conservatives and anti-Home Rule Liberal Unionists."},{"text":"Conservative and Labour strength.","correct":false,"explanation":"Labour was only beginning to emerge and did not underpin Salisbury’s ministries. His political dominance rested on the combined strength of Conservatives and Liberal Unionists."}]},{"id":"a2bc508a-ac92-4a42-92ad-851c79453790","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The Boer War, [ ], exposed military and social weaknesses and fed the debate over [ ].","back":"The Boer War, 1899-1902, exposed military and social weaknesses and fed the debate over national efficiency.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Boer War, 1899-1902, exposed military and social weaknesses and fed the debate over national efficiency.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Boer War lasted from 1899 to 1902. Recruitment failures and military difficulties revealed poor health and organisation, intensifying demands for greater national efficiency."},{"text":"The Boer War, 1899-1901, exposed military and social weaknesses and fed the debate over national efficiency.","correct":false,"explanation":"Ending the war in 1901 overlooks the final year of guerrilla conflict and peace settlement. It lasted from 1899 to 1902 and stimulated debate over national efficiency."},{"text":"The Boer War, 1880-1881, exposed military and social weaknesses and fed the debate over national efficiency.","correct":false,"explanation":"These dates belong to the First Boer War, not the conflict associated with the national efficiency debate. The relevant Boer War took place from 1899 to 1902."},{"text":"The Boer War, 1899-1902, exposed military and social weaknesses and fed the debate over tariff reform.","correct":false,"explanation":"Tariff reform became a major controversy through Chamberlain’s campaign from 1903, but the war’s military and social revelations primarily fuelled debate over national efficiency."}]},{"id":"000791ed-bbb2-4a9a-bb6c-a6e876ff35b1","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did the Education Act 1902 anger Nonconformists?","back":"Local rates supported Church schools.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Local rates supported Church schools.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Act allowed locally raised rates to fund denominational schools, especially Anglican institutions. Nonconformists objected to paying taxes that supported religious teaching outside their own traditions."},{"text":"Local rates supported private schools.","correct":false,"explanation":"The central grievance was not public funding for ordinary private education. Nonconformists opposed local rates being used to support denominational Church schools, particularly Anglican ones."},{"text":"Local rates supported Sunday schools.","correct":false,"explanation":"Sunday schools were not the central funding controversy created by the Act. Nonconformist anger focused on local rates financing Church schools and their denominational teaching."},{"text":"Local rates supported public schools.","correct":false,"explanation":"Fee-charging public schools were not the source of Nonconformist opposition. The Act angered them because local rates were used to maintain denominational Church schools."}]},{"id":"0c427e26-3028-452e-975c-2f5aae6fdc92","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which Conservative policy dispute from 1903 helped cause the Liberal landslide of 1906?","back":"Joseph Chamberlain’s Tariff Reform campaign.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Joseph Chamberlain’s Tariff Reform campaign.","correct":true,"explanation":"Chamberlain’s campaign for imperial preference and protective tariffs divided Conservatives between tariff reformers and free traders, helping the united Liberals win decisively in 1906."},{"text":"Arthur Balfour’s Home Rule campaign.","correct":false,"explanation":"Balfour and the Conservatives opposed rather than campaigned for Home Rule. The damaging dispute beginning in 1903 concerned Joseph Chamberlain’s campaign for Tariff Reform."},{"text":"Lord Salisbury’s social reform campaign.","correct":false,"explanation":"Salisbury had retired as prime minister in 1902 and did not launch the divisive 1903 campaign. Joseph Chamberlain’s Tariff Reform proposals split the Conservatives."},{"text":"Randolph Churchill’s Tory Democracy campaign.","correct":false,"explanation":"Tory Democracy belonged mainly to Randolph Churchill’s politics of the 1880s, and he died in 1895. The dispute from 1903 centred on Joseph Chamberlain’s Tariff Reform campaign."}]},{"id":"2ca0a529-cfd0-479e-857e-da1c4b07f3cf","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did the Taff Vale judgement 1901 encourage union support for Labour?","back":"Unions sought parliamentary protection after the judgement.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Unions sought parliamentary protection after the judgement.","correct":true,"explanation":"Taff Vale made unions liable for financial damages caused by strike action. Unions therefore backed Labour candidates who could secure legislation protecting their funds and activities."},{"text":"Unions sought government compensation after the judgement.","correct":false,"explanation":"The unions did not primarily demand state repayment of their losses. They sought parliamentary protection against future legal liability, encouraging financial and electoral support for Labour."},{"text":"Unions sought higher wages after the judgement.","correct":false,"explanation":"Higher wages were a continuing trade union objective, but not the specific political response to Taff Vale. Unions wanted parliamentary protection from liability for strike damages."},{"text":"Unions sought compulsory arbitration after the judgement.","correct":false,"explanation":"Compulsory arbitration was not the unions’ central response and could restrict strike action. They supported Labour to obtain parliamentary protection from the judgement’s legal consequences."}]},{"id":"7ad4e14f-3568-4529-b107-9635e372f899","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The Labour Representation Committee was founded in [ ]; the Lib-Lab pact came in [ ].","back":"The Labour Representation Committee was founded in 1900; the Lib-Lab pact came in 1903.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Labour Representation Committee was founded in 1900; the Lib-Lab pact came in 1903.","correct":true,"explanation":"Trade unionists and socialist organisations founded the Labour Representation Committee in 1900. Ramsay MacDonald and Herbert Gladstone then negotiated the Lib-Lab electoral pact in 1903."},{"text":"The Labour Representation Committee was founded in 1906; the Lib-Lab pact came in 1903.","correct":false,"explanation":"The 1906 date marks the adoption of the name Labour Party after its electoral breakthrough, not the committee’s foundation. The LRC was founded in 1900."},{"text":"The Labour Representation Committee was founded in 1900; the Lib-Lab pact came in 1906.","correct":false,"explanation":"The pact helped prepare for the 1906 general election but was negotiated earlier, in 1903. The Labour Representation Committee had been founded in 1900."},{"text":"The Labour Representation Committee was founded in 1893; the Lib-Lab pact came in 1906.","correct":false,"explanation":"The 1893 date belongs to the Independent Labour Party, while 1906 was the pact’s electoral payoff. The LRC began in 1900 and the pact followed in 1903."}]},{"id":"fbe5c3ef-d8e7-4375-aa72-3875372a5766","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The constitutional crisis began when the Lords rejected Lloyd George’s [ ] in [ ].","back":"The constitutional crisis began when the Lords rejected Lloyd George’s People’s Budget in 1909.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The constitutional crisis began when the Lords rejected Lloyd George’s People’s Budget in 1909.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Lords’ rejection of Lloyd George’s People’s Budget in 1909 triggered the constitutional crisis, leading eventually to the Parliament Act 1911 and restrictions on their powers."},{"text":"The constitutional crisis began when the Lords rejected Lloyd George’s Finance Bill in 1910.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Lords rejected the People’s Budget, not simply a Finance Bill, and this occurred in 1909. Confusing the budget’s later legislative form with the original event changes both key details."},{"text":"The constitutional crisis began when the Lords rejected Lloyd George’s People’s Budget in 1910.","correct":false,"explanation":"The People’s Budget was rejected in 1909, not 1910. The date matters because the crisis preceded the 1910 general elections and the eventual Parliament Act 1911."},{"text":"The constitutional crisis began when the Lords rejected Lloyd George’s National Insurance Bill in 1909.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Lords’ rejection concerned the People’s Budget, which proposed increased taxation, rather than the National Insurance Bill. The budget rejection created the constitutional confrontation over the Lords’ veto."}]},{"id":"c11d266e-92c7-4c70-b0fb-6e08e6e50976","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What two limits did the Parliament Act 1911 place on the Lords?","back":"

Removed the Lords’ veto over money bills.
Limited their delaying power.

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Removed the Lords’ veto over money bills.
Limited their delaying power.

","correct":true,"explanation":"The Parliament Act 1911 removed the Lords’ power to veto money bills and reduced their ability to delay other public bills from an effective veto to a limited delaying role."},{"text":"

Removed the Lords’ veto over all bills.
Limited their amending power.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The Act removed the Lords’ veto over money bills, not all bills, and its main wider restriction concerned delaying power. The Lords retained some ability to revise and delay legislation."},{"text":"

Removed the Lords’ veto over money bills.
Removed their amending power.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The Lords lost their veto over money bills, but they did not lose all power to amend legislation. The second restriction was a limit on how long they could delay other bills."},{"text":"

Limited the Lords’ veto over money bills.
Removed their delaying power.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The Lords’ veto over money bills was removed entirely, while their delaying power was limited rather than abolished. They could still delay public bills for a defined period."}]},{"id":"880c8388-0a9d-48c8-841a-18440372ff59","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did NUWSS and WSPU suffrage tactics differ?","back":"

NUWSS used constitutional methods.
WSPU used militancy.

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

NUWSS used constitutional methods.
WSPU used militancy.

","correct":true,"explanation":"The NUWSS pursued votes for women through lawful constitutional campaigning, whereas the WSPU adopted militant tactics such as demonstrations, civil disobedience and property damage."},{"text":"

NUWSS used militancy.
WSPU used constitutional methods.

","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the organisations’ approaches. The NUWSS was the constitutional suffrage movement, while the WSPU became associated with militant direct action."},{"text":"

NUWSS used parliamentary lobbying only.
WSPU used peaceful petitions.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The NUWSS used broader constitutional campaigning than parliamentary lobbying alone, and the WSPU was not limited to peaceful petitions. Its defining feature was militancy."},{"text":"

NUWSS used peaceful protest.
WSPU used trade-union strikes.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Although NUWSS methods were peaceful, the key contrast was constitutional methods versus militancy. The WSPU used direct militant action rather than primarily organising trade-union strikes."}]},{"id":"b4e60bfe-7050-4841-a7f2-71ffa4532bcd","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did New Liberalism argue real freedom sometimes required?","back":"State action.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"State action.","correct":true,"explanation":"New Liberals argued that genuine freedom could require the state to intervene, for example through welfare reforms that protected people from poverty, ill health and unemployment."},{"text":"Individual self-help.","correct":false,"explanation":"Individual self-help reflects the older Liberal emphasis on personal responsibility. New Liberalism argued that poverty and social conditions could restrict freedom, making state action necessary."},{"text":"Private charity.","correct":false,"explanation":"Private charity was viewed as insufficient for tackling widespread social problems. New Liberals believed organised state action was sometimes needed to create the conditions for real freedom."},{"text":"Limited government.","correct":false,"explanation":"Limited government is closer to classical laissez-faire Liberalism. New Liberalism marked a shift towards state intervention where social and economic conditions prevented individuals from exercising meaningful freedom."}]},{"id":"d6c32387-fc20-44ea-adad-e0f1cb90550a","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Liberal welfare reform marked a move away from strict [ ].","back":"Liberal welfare reform marked a move away from strict laissez-faire.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"laissez-faire","correct":true,"explanation":"Liberal welfare reforms such as free school meals, National Insurance and pensions represented a move away from strict laissez-faire and towards greater state intervention in social conditions."},{"text":"collectivism","correct":false,"explanation":"Collectivism involved greater shared or state responsibility and was closer to the direction of New Liberal reform. The reform movement was away from strict laissez-faire, not collectivism."},{"text":"socialism","correct":false,"explanation":"Socialism advocated collective ownership and was associated with Labour and socialist politics. Liberal welfare reform moved away from laissez-faire without becoming fully socialist."},{"text":"paternalism","correct":false,"explanation":"Paternalism describes intervention justified as being for people’s welfare, which could characterise aspects of Liberal reform. The contrasting doctrine abandoned by reform was strict laissez-faire."}]},{"id":"ab37a6b7-2242-4187-9161-ce3b8c409288","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did Lloyd George replacing Asquith in 1916 affect the Liberals?","back":"It split them into Asquithians and Lloyd Georgians.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It split them into Asquithians and Lloyd Georgians.","correct":true,"explanation":"Lloyd George’s replacement of Asquith as prime minister in 1916 deepened the Liberal split, creating rival Asquithian and Lloyd Georgian factions that struggled to reunite."},{"text":"It split them into Asquithians and Conservatives.","correct":false,"explanation":"The division was within the Liberal Party, between Asquithians and Lloyd Georgians. Conservatives were a separate party, although some supported Lloyd George’s coalition government."},{"text":"It split them into Lloyd Georgians and Labourites.","correct":false,"explanation":"The split produced two Liberal factions, not a Liberal-Labour division. The rival groups were supporters of Asquith and supporters of Lloyd George."},{"text":"It united them as Asquithians and Lloyd Georgians.","correct":false,"explanation":"The two labels identify rival factions rather than a united Liberal Party. Lloyd George replacing Asquith intensified personal and political divisions among Liberals."}]},{"id":"2fd46d8e-b498-4788-83ff-c9aa598f84ca","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Labour’s [ ] included Clause IV, committing Labour to [ ].","back":"Labour’s 1918 Constitution included Clause IV, committing Labour to common ownership.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Labour’s 1918 Constitution included Clause IV, committing Labour to common ownership.","correct":true,"explanation":"Labour’s 1918 Constitution included Clause IV, which committed the party to securing the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange."},{"text":"Labour’s 1918 Constitution included Clause IV, committing Labour to nationalisation.","correct":false,"explanation":"The 1918 Constitution and Clause IV are correctly identified, but the wording of the commitment was common ownership. Nationalisation is related but is not the exact term required here."},{"text":"Labour’s 1919 Constitution included Clause IV, committing Labour to common ownership.","correct":false,"explanation":"Clause IV was included in Labour’s 1918 Constitution, not a 1919 constitution. Common ownership is the correct commitment, but the date is an off-by-one error."},{"text":"Labour’s 1918 Constitution included Clause IV, committing Labour to private ownership.","correct":false,"explanation":"The constitution was adopted in 1918, but Clause IV committed Labour to common ownership rather than private ownership. Private ownership represents the opposite ideological principle."}]},{"id":"8f9dc621-fa44-4c15-8a55-67a8eef28493","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What franchise change did the Representation of the People Act 1918 make?","back":"It gave votes to nearly all men over 21 and some women over 30.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It gave votes to nearly all men over 21 and some women over 30.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Representation of the People Act 1918 extended the vote to nearly all men aged over 21 and to women over 30 who met specified property qualifications."},{"text":"It gave votes to nearly all men over 21 and some women over 21.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Act enfranchised women over 30, not women over 21. The lower male voting age and higher female age threshold were central features of the 1918 settlement."},{"text":"It gave votes to all men over 21 and some women over 30.","correct":false,"explanation":"The female age and qualification are broadly correct, but the Act did not enfranchise literally all men over 21. Some male exclusions remained, so the accurate wording is nearly all men."},{"text":"It gave votes to nearly all men over 18 and some women over 30.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Act extended the vote to nearly all men over 21, not over 18. The lower age of 18 is a later association with universal suffrage, not the 1918 rule."}]}]}],"examCountdown":{"examDate":"2027-05-12","paperLabel":"Paper 1"},"heading":"Liberals, Conservatives and the Rise of Labour 1846–1918","title":"Liberals, Conservatives and the Rise of Labour 1846–1918 Flashcards","topbar":{"backHref":"/as-level/history/ocr/flashcards"},"topicSidebar":"$L39"}]}],"topicId":"2532579f-5404-5b50-9138-dbf37bf0e24b","walled":"$L3a"}],"$L3b","$L3c"]