32:I[196793,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/33xgs57_c1jx_.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/117yqm55h4y_p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3hkl04r--3y18.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ekz38h993cj8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3_o3al2nkyqic.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2z-64g1onu4uw.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505"],"Gingerbread"] 34:I[647935,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/33xgs57_c1jx_.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/117yqm55h4y_p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3hkl04r--3y18.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ekz38h993cj8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3_o3al2nkyqic.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2z-64g1onu4uw.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505"],"RecordResourceResume"] 35:I[830476,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/33xgs57_c1jx_.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/117yqm55h4y_p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3hkl04r--3y18.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ekz38h993cj8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3_o3al2nkyqic.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2z-64g1onu4uw.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505"],"FlashcardAccessBranch"] 36:I[315438,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/33xgs57_c1jx_.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/117yqm55h4y_p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3hkl04r--3y18.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2ekz38h993cj8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3_o3al2nkyqic.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2z-64g1onu4uw.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790195505"],"TopicFlashcardRunner"] 23:[["$","$L32",null,{"feature":"flashcards"}],"$L33",["$","$L34",null,{"href":"/as-level/history/ocr/as-from-pitt-to-peel-1783-1853/flashcards","label":"From Pitt to Peel 1783–1853","subjectCode":"as_level_history__ocr","surface":"flashcards"}],["$","$L35",null,{"runner":["$","div",null,{"className":"min-h-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden bg-background","children":["$","$L36",null,{"decks":[{"id":"2c288155-32e5-4d79-a68a-70a8d6a31ac1","title":"From Pitt to Peel 1783–1853 Flashcards","topicId":"a85da9bb-3984-5548-a10e-dc1daca3c8ba","topicSlug":"as-from-pitt-to-peel-1783-1853","cards":[{"id":"6b6511dd-ecc5-479e-adc5-cb65cb3c34e4","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Pitt's 1784 election victory matter for government power?","back":"It showed government still relied on royal influence, patronage and aristocratic networks.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It showed government still relied on royal influence, patronage and aristocratic networks.","correct":true,"explanation":"George III’s support, government patronage and local aristocratic influence helped Pitt secure his majority, demonstrating that political power still depended heavily on traditional elite networks."},{"text":"It showed government now relied on universal suffrage, mass parties and national campaigns.","correct":false,"explanation":"Universal suffrage and organised mass parties did not exist in 1784. Pitt’s victory instead showed the continuing importance of royal influence, patronage and aristocratic networks."},{"text":"It showed government had become independent of royal influence, patronage and aristocratic networks.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the significance of the election. George III’s intervention and established patronage networks were crucial, so government had not become independent of traditional influence."},{"text":"It showed government now depended on industrial workers, reform societies and trade unions.","correct":false,"explanation":"Industrial workers lacked the vote, while reform societies and trade unions did not provide Pitt’s electoral base. His strength came from royal backing, patronage and aristocratic influence."}]},{"id":"9bc6c4d2-3cb7-4db5-8a89-ca8ca0658269","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Pitt's [ ] of 1786 aimed to reduce [ ].","back":"Pitt's Sinking Fund of 1786 aimed to reduce national debt.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Pitt's Sinking Fund of 1786 aimed to reduce national debt.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Sinking Fund set aside government revenue to repay borrowing over time, reflecting Pitt’s attempt to restore public finances by reducing the national debt."},{"text":"Pitt's Sinking Fund of 1786 aimed to reduce income tax.","correct":false,"explanation":"Income tax was not introduced until 1799, mainly to finance war with France. The 1786 Sinking Fund was created to reduce the national debt."},{"text":"Pitt's Commutation Act of 1786 aimed to reduce national debt.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Commutation Act reduced tea duties to discourage smuggling; it was not the debt-repayment scheme. Pitt’s Sinking Fund aimed to reduce the national debt."},{"text":"Pitt's Consolidation Act of 1786 aimed to reduce customs duties.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Consolidation Act reorganised numerous customs duties rather than simply reducing them. The Sinking Fund of 1786 was intended to reduce the national debt."}]},{"id":"19ab866d-4ad7-4823-b463-cdd6d609e043","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did events after 1789 make Pitt less tolerant of radical societies?","back":"War with France and invasion fears made radical agitation seem a security threat.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"War with France and invasion fears made radical agitation seem a security threat.","correct":true,"explanation":"After the French Revolution, war and fears of invasion encouraged ministers to associate British radical societies with revolutionary France, making domestic agitation appear dangerous to national security."},{"text":"Peace with France and falling prices made radical agitation seem a minor nuisance.","correct":false,"explanation":"Britain entered war with revolutionary France in 1793, while invasion and conspiracy fears intensified. These pressures made radical agitation seem a serious security threat, not a minor nuisance."},{"text":"War with France and invasion fears made aristocratic opposition seem a security threat.","correct":false,"explanation":"Pitt feared radical societies influenced by French revolutionary ideas, rather than aristocratic opposition as a class. War and invasion fears made radical agitation appear threatening."},{"text":"Economic growth and social stability made radical agitation seem politically harmless.","correct":false,"explanation":"The 1790s brought war, hardship and fears of revolutionary unrest rather than reassuring stability. Pitt therefore treated radical agitation as a potential security threat."}]},{"id":"f68e0e7b-8d57-41c7-8535-14d85cb3d9f8","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Pitt suspended [ ] in 1794; the [ ] restricted trade union activity in 1799-1800.","back":"Pitt suspended Habeas Corpus in 1794; the Combination Acts restricted trade union activity in 1799-1800.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Pitt suspended Habeas Corpus in 1794; the Combination Acts restricted trade union activity in 1799-1800.","correct":true,"explanation":"Suspending Habeas Corpus allowed detention without normal trial protections, while the Combination Acts prohibited workers’ combinations, forming part of Pitt’s repression of perceived radical threats."},{"text":"Pitt suspended Habeas Corpus in 1794; the Six Acts restricted trade union activity in 1799-1800.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Six Acts were passed in 1819 after Peterloo and targeted radical meetings and publications. The Combination Acts of 1799-1800 restricted trade union activity."},{"text":"Pitt suspended the Test Act in 1794; the Combination Acts restricted trade union activity in 1799-1800.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Test Act imposed religious qualifications and was not suspended by Pitt in 1794. He suspended Habeas Corpus, while the Combination Acts restricted workers’ organisations."},{"text":"Pitt suspended Habeas Corpus in 1794; the Corresponding Acts restricted public meetings in 1799-1800.","correct":false,"explanation":"There were no Corresponding Acts fitting this description. Pitt suspended Habeas Corpus in 1794, and the Combination Acts of 1799-1800 restricted trade union activity."}]},{"id":"8fe96667-6db3-47fa-a0cd-bf4d98e39164","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did the Whig split of 1790-1794 strengthen Pitt?","back":"The Portland Whigs joined Pitt, widening elite support and isolating Foxite reformers.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Portland Whigs joined Pitt, widening elite support and isolating Foxite reformers.","correct":true,"explanation":"Fear of the French Revolution led conservative Whigs under Portland to support Pitt. This broadened his governing coalition and left Fox’s reform-minded Whigs increasingly isolated."},{"text":"The Foxite Whigs joined Pitt, widening reform support and isolating Portland conservatives.","correct":false,"explanation":"Fox and his followers remained in opposition and defended reform. It was the conservative Portland Whigs who joined Pitt, widening elite support and isolating the Foxites."},{"text":"The Portland Whigs opposed Pitt, narrowing elite support and strengthening Foxite reformers.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the political effect of the split. Portland’s conservative followers joined Pitt, expanding his elite support and leaving Foxite reformers more isolated."},{"text":"The Grenville Whigs joined Fox, widening radical support and isolating Pitt's government.","correct":false,"explanation":"The decisive realignment involved Portland’s conservative Whigs joining Pitt, not Grenville Whigs joining Fox. This strengthened the government and weakened the Foxite opposition."}]},{"id":"0db7b2d6-9384-4e3a-a19a-b25585caac5a","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why was the Corn Law 1815 unpopular with consumers?","back":"It restricted cheaper foreign grain, helping keep bread prices high.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It restricted cheaper foreign grain, helping keep bread prices high.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Corn Law prevented foreign grain imports until domestic prices reached a high threshold. This protected landowners and farmers but kept bread expensive for consumers."},{"text":"It encouraged cheaper foreign grain, helping drive bread prices lower.","correct":false,"explanation":"The law restricted rather than encouraged foreign grain imports. By limiting cheaper competition, it protected domestic producers and helped keep bread prices high."},{"text":"It restricted expensive British grain, helping keep bread prices low.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Corn Law protected British grain producers instead of restricting their produce. It excluded cheaper foreign grain and therefore helped maintain high bread prices."},{"text":"It subsidised cheaper foreign grain, helping keep farm profits high.","correct":false,"explanation":"The government did not subsidise foreign grain under the 1815 law. It restricted cheaper imports to protect British agriculture, with higher bread prices harming consumers."}]},{"id":"1fbee1aa-3762-4683-be71-173a42199e29","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How did Liverpool's government respond after Peterloo in 1819?","back":"

Backed the magistrates who broke up the meeting.
Passed the Six Acts restricting radical activity.

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Backed the magistrates who broke up the meeting.
Passed the Six Acts restricting radical activity.

","correct":true,"explanation":"Liverpool’s government defended the local authorities responsible for dispersing the meeting and then passed the repressive Six Acts to restrict radical meetings, drilling and publications."},{"text":"

Dismissed the magistrates who broke up the meeting.
Repealed the Six Acts restricting radical activity.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The government did not punish the magistrates or repeal repressive legislation. It backed the authorities at Peterloo and passed the Six Acts to curb radical activity."},{"text":"

Condemned the yeomanry who broke up the meeting.
Passed the Reform Act extending voting rights.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Liverpool’s ministry defended the authorities rather than condemning the yeomanry, and parliamentary reform came only in 1832. Its immediate response was to pass the Six Acts."},{"text":"

Supported the reformers who organised the meeting.
Passed the Corn Law restricting foreign imports.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The government sided with the magistrates, not the reformers. The Corn Law had already passed in 1815; after Peterloo, ministers enacted the Six Acts."}]},{"id":"106b3f93-e3d8-4b4b-8ef3-d0ea29e5ae88","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"After 1822, [ ] meant cautious reform to modernise the state without accepting [ ].","back":"After 1822, liberal Toryism meant cautious reform to modernise the state without accepting democracy.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"After 1822, liberal Toryism meant cautious reform to modernise the state without accepting democracy.","correct":true,"explanation":"Liberal Tories such as Peel and Huskisson supported administrative, legal and economic reforms, but they sought efficient government rather than democratic political transformation."},{"text":"After 1822, radical Whiggism meant cautious reform to modernise the state without accepting democracy.","correct":false,"explanation":"The cautious modernising tendency within Liverpool’s ministry was liberal Toryism, not radical Whiggism. Its supporters pursued practical reform while rejecting democratic government."},{"text":"After 1822, liberal Toryism meant cautious reform to modernise the state without accepting monarchy.","correct":false,"explanation":"Liberal Tories accepted and served the monarchy; their limit was democracy and extensive popular political power. They modernised institutions without endorsing democratic rule."},{"text":"After 1822, High Toryism meant cautious reform to modernise the state without accepting free trade.","correct":false,"explanation":"High Tories generally defended established institutions and protection rather than leading cautious modernisation. Liberal Toryism pursued reform while stopping short of accepting democracy."}]},{"id":"4013b877-d287-47b0-b880-ea8b1c60cc4c","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Roman Catholic Emancipation follow in 1829?","back":"Daniel O'Connell's County Clare by-election victory made exclusion politically dangerous.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Daniel O'Connell's County Clare by-election victory made exclusion politically dangerous.","correct":true,"explanation":"O'Connell's victory showed that a Catholic could win election despite being barred from taking his seat, making continued exclusion politically risky and increasing pressure for emancipation."},{"text":"The Duke of Wellington's Waterloo victory made exclusion politically dangerous.","correct":false,"explanation":"Waterloo strengthened Wellington but did not make Catholic exclusion politically dangerous. The key pressure came from O'Connell's County Clare by-election victory, which demonstrated that exclusion was becoming unworkable."},{"text":"The repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts made exclusion politically dangerous.","correct":false,"explanation":"Repealing these acts benefited Protestant Dissenters but did not directly threaten Catholic exclusion. The decisive event was O'Connell's County Clare by-election victory, which exposed the political danger of refusing emancipation."},{"text":"The Peterloo massacre made exclusion politically dangerous.","correct":false,"explanation":"Peterloo increased concern about radicalism and reform, but it did not directly force Catholic Emancipation. O'Connell's County Clare by-election victory showed that Catholic exclusion could no longer be safely maintained."}]},{"id":"98a0ecea-c9d4-4219-b571-13563abae1a2","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Pitt's [ ] relied on naval power, colonial attacks and trade warfare rather than huge British armies in Europe.","back":"Pitt's blue water strategy relied on naval power, colonial attacks and trade warfare rather than huge British armies in Europe.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"blue water strategy","correct":true,"explanation":"Pitt's blue water strategy used Britain's naval superiority, overseas possessions and commercial warfare to weaken France without relying on a very large British army fighting across Europe."},{"text":"continental strategy","correct":false,"explanation":"A continental strategy would prioritise maintaining a large British army in Europe, the opposite of Pitt's approach. His blue water strategy relied chiefly on naval power, colonial attacks and trade warfare."},{"text":"armed neutrality strategy","correct":false,"explanation":"Armed neutrality involved protecting neutral shipping rights and was not Pitt's main wartime method. The strategy described is the blue water strategy, centred on naval and commercial power."},{"text":"national militia strategy","correct":false,"explanation":"A militia strategy would depend mainly on expanding domestic land forces, whereas Pitt sought to avoid huge British armies in Europe. The correct term is blue water strategy."}]},{"id":"7cf1ee7e-55d6-45c9-a7ac-a4a3ff9cefff","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did representation before 1832 look increasingly indefensible?","back":"Rotten boroughs returned MPs while major industrial towns were under-represented.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Rotten boroughs returned MPs while major industrial towns were under-represented.","correct":true,"explanation":"The unreformed system allowed tiny or sparsely populated rotten boroughs to return MPs, while rapidly growing industrial towns such as Manchester lacked fair parliamentary representation."},{"text":"Large counties returned MPs while major industrial towns were over-represented.","correct":false,"explanation":"Industrial towns were not over-represented; they were under-represented or lacked MPs altogether. Rotten boroughs returning MPs made the unequal system increasingly difficult to defend."},{"text":"Rotten boroughs returned MPs while rural villages were under-represented.","correct":false,"explanation":"The central grievance concerned major industrial towns whose populations had grown rapidly without matching representation. Rural areas were generally better represented within the unreformed system."},{"text":"Major industrial towns returned MPs while rotten boroughs were under-represented.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the problem. Rotten boroughs often had disproportionate representation, while major industrial towns were under-represented, making the pre-1832 system appear indefensible."}]},{"id":"512d38dc-ceff-4a16-abaf-9fae71d12c38","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The Great Reform Act 1832 created the [ ] and roughly [ ] the electorate in England and Wales.","back":"The Great Reform Act 1832 created the £10 borough household franchise and roughly doubled the electorate in England and Wales.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Great Reform Act 1832 created the £10 borough household franchise and roughly doubled the electorate in England and Wales.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Act introduced a standard £10 household qualification in boroughs and substantially expanded the electorate, roughly doubling the number of voters in England and Wales."},{"text":"The Great Reform Act 1832 created the £10 borough household franchise and roughly halved the electorate in England and Wales.","correct":false,"explanation":"The £10 borough franchise is correct, but the electorate expanded rather than contracted. It roughly doubled because more middle-class householders gained the vote."},{"text":"The Great Reform Act 1832 created the £5 borough household franchise and roughly doubled the electorate in England and Wales.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Act did expand the electorate roughly twofold, but the borough qualification was £10, not £5. Confusing these thresholds understates the property qualification required to vote."},{"text":"The Great Reform Act 1832 created the £10 county household franchise and roughly doubled the electorate in England and Wales.","correct":false,"explanation":"The £10 qualification applied to borough householders, not as a general county household franchise. The Act also roughly doubled the electorate, but this option misidentifies the franchise."}]},{"id":"626841c9-c225-4d5e-9f69-5c4ad797a169","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did the Great Reform Act 1832 not create democracy?","back":"

Most working-class men still could not vote.
All women remained excluded.

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Most working-class men still could not vote.
All women remained excluded.

","correct":true,"explanation":"The Act widened voting rights mainly for sections of the middle class. Most working-class men remained excluded by property qualifications, and women continued to have no parliamentary vote."},{"text":"

Most middle-class men still could not vote.
All women remained excluded.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Many middle-class men gained the vote through the new property qualifications, so the main excluded group was most working-class men. Women were still entirely excluded."},{"text":"

Most working-class men gained the vote.
Some women remained excluded.

","correct":false,"explanation":"The Act did not enfranchise most working-class men, and it excluded all women rather than only some. These changes wrongly overstate the democratic nature of the reform."},{"text":"

All adult men still could not vote.
All women remained excluded.

","correct":false,"explanation":"Not all adult men were excluded: many men meeting the new property qualifications gained the vote. The accurate limits were that most working-class men and all women remained excluded."}]},{"id":"1045fde5-349b-4b08-8b03-6e5a8ebbda0e","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did parliamentary reform pass in 1832?","back":"Elites judged limited reform the safest way to preserve order amid pressure.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Elites judged limited reform the safest way to preserve order amid pressure.","correct":true,"explanation":"Political elites accepted restricted reform because continued resistance risked disorder and possibly revolution. Limited change could absorb pressure while preserving the existing social and political hierarchy."},{"text":"Elites judged universal suffrage the safest way to preserve order amid pressure.","correct":false,"explanation":"Universal suffrage went far beyond what elites accepted in 1832. They sought limited reform to reduce unrest while maintaining substantial restrictions on political participation."},{"text":"Elites judged abolishing Parliament the safest way to preserve order amid pressure.","correct":false,"explanation":"Abolishing Parliament would have destroyed the constitutional system rather than stabilised it. Elites instead supported limited reform as a controlled response to pressure for change."},{"text":"Elites judged restoring rotten boroughs the safest way to preserve order amid pressure.","correct":false,"explanation":"Restoring rotten boroughs would have intensified opposition because they symbolised unfair representation. Limited reform was considered safer because it addressed grievances without creating full democracy."}]},{"id":"af78a7bf-ae99-4f41-b1b9-9b241ffac566","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The [ ] accepted the Reform Act as settled and promised [ ] of institutions.","back":"The Tamworth Manifesto accepted the Reform Act as settled and promised careful review of institutions.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Tamworth Manifesto accepted the Reform Act as settled and promised careful review of institutions.","correct":true,"explanation":"Peel's Tamworth Manifesto accepted the 1832 settlement and presented conservatism as compatible with carefully reviewing institutions where reform was necessary and beneficial."},{"text":"The Tamworth Manifesto rejected the Reform Act as settled and promised complete abolition of institutions.","correct":false,"explanation":"Peel did not reject the Reform Act or promise to abolish institutions. The manifesto accepted the settlement and offered careful review rather than sweeping destruction."},{"text":"The Peterloo Declaration accepted the Reform Act as settled and promised careful review of institutions.","correct":false,"explanation":"The relevant document was Peel's Tamworth Manifesto, not a Peterloo Declaration. Its significance lay in accepting the Reform Act while promising careful institutional review."},{"text":"The Tamworth Manifesto accepted the Reform Act as settled and promised immediate democratisation of institutions.","correct":false,"explanation":"Peel's promise was cautious review, not immediate democratisation. The Tamworth Manifesto aimed to modernise conservatism while limiting the pace and extent of further change."}]},{"id":"07714924-f801-4043-a819-9b6f479e6a6f","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did Peel use restored income tax revenue for in 1842?","back":"It funded tariff reductions.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It funded tariff reductions.","correct":true,"explanation":"Peel used the restored revenue from income tax to compensate for reduced customs revenue when tariffs were cut, helping pursue freer trade and lower the cost of imported goods."},{"text":"It funded higher tariffs.","correct":false,"explanation":"The revenue supported tariff reductions, not increases. Peel used income tax to replace some customs revenue lost through lowering duties as part of his freer-trade policy."},{"text":"It funded abolition of income tax.","correct":false,"explanation":"Income tax was restored in 1842 rather than abolished, and its revenue was used to support tariff reductions. Ending the tax would have removed the resource needed for that policy."},{"text":"It funded expansion of the army.","correct":false,"explanation":"The immediate purpose was to finance tariff reductions and the resulting loss of customs revenue, not primarily to expand the army. This reflects a mistaken association with military spending."}]},{"id":"ecc0c660-2870-46af-ac9d-954ce920db6b","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Which pressure group campaigned for repeal of the Corn Laws?","back":"The Anti-Corn Law League.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Anti-Corn Law League.","correct":true,"explanation":"Founded in 1838, the Anti-Corn Law League mobilised middle-class opinion through meetings, publications and election campaigns to press for free trade and repeal."},{"text":"The Chartist movement.","correct":false,"explanation":"Chartism campaigned primarily for the six political reforms in the People’s Charter. The Anti-Corn Law League was the pressure group specifically established to secure repeal."},{"text":"The National Political Union.","correct":false,"explanation":"Political unions were chiefly associated with parliamentary reform, particularly around the 1832 Reform Act. The Anti-Corn Law League organised the dedicated campaign against the Corn Laws."},{"text":"The Central Agricultural Protection Society.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Central Agricultural Protection Society defended agricultural protection and therefore opposed repeal. The Anti-Corn Law League campaigned to remove the Corn Laws and establish free trade."}]},{"id":"96e66375-6ed7-4cc7-8dd8-e962ab6ac119","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What made Corn Law repeal urgent from 1845?","back":"The Irish Famine.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The Irish Famine.","correct":true,"explanation":"The potato blight produced a catastrophic food crisis in Ireland from 1845, convincing Peel that restrictions on imported grain had to be removed urgently."},{"text":"The Chartist Convention.","correct":false,"explanation":"Chartist conventions pursued political reform rather than making Corn Law repeal urgent. The Irish Famine created an immediate need for cheaper imported food from 1845."},{"text":"The Swing Riots.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Swing Riots were rural disturbances of 1830 and were not the immediate cause of repeal. Urgency arose from the Irish Famine beginning in 1845."},{"text":"The railway mania.","correct":false,"explanation":"Railway mania encouraged speculative investment but did not create the food emergency behind repeal. The Irish Famine made access to imported grain urgently necessary."}]},{"id":"07dbbd9f-7220-4feb-8cb4-e5f3381943f3","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why did Corn Law repeal destroy Peel's government?","back":"Conservative protectionists defeated him on an Irish Coercion Bill.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Conservative protectionists defeated him on an Irish Coercion Bill.","correct":true,"explanation":"Protectionist Conservatives, angered by Peel’s abandonment of the Corn Laws, helped defeat his Irish Coercion Bill in June 1846, forcing his government to resign."},{"text":"Liberal free traders defeated him on an Irish Coercion Bill.","correct":false,"explanation":"Free traders had helped Peel pass Corn Law repeal and were not the Conservative rebels who brought him down. Protectionists took revenge by defeating the Irish Coercion Bill."},{"text":"Conservative protectionists defeated him on the Corn Importation Bill.","correct":false,"explanation":"Protectionists opposed the Corn Importation Bill, but repeal passed with opposition support. Peel fell when protectionists subsequently helped defeat his Irish Coercion Bill."},{"text":"Conservative free traders defeated him on a Factory Bill.","correct":false,"explanation":"Peel’s fall was not caused by a Factory Bill or by Conservative free traders. Protectionists retaliated against repeal by defeating his government on the Irish Coercion Bill."}]},{"id":"f9b8052c-7b80-496a-94b3-675b7f0f1bd5","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"The New Poor Law 1834 used workhouses based on [ ]: relief should be less attractive than [ ].","back":"The New Poor Law 1834 used workhouses based on less eligibility: relief should be less attractive than lowest-paid labour.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The New Poor Law 1834 used workhouses based on less eligibility: relief should be less attractive than lowest-paid labour.","correct":true,"explanation":"Less eligibility required workhouse conditions to be worse than the living conditions available to the lowest-paid independent labourer, thereby deterring all but the genuinely desperate."},{"text":"The New Poor Law 1834 used workhouses based on less eligibility: relief should be less attractive than unemployment.","correct":false,"explanation":"Less eligibility compared relief with the circumstances of the lowest-paid labourer, not unemployment. Workhouse conditions were deliberately made less attractive than earning even the lowest wages."},{"text":"The New Poor Law 1834 used workhouses based on minimum subsistence: relief should be less attractive than lowest-paid labour.","correct":false,"explanation":"Minimum subsistence describes a possible level of provision, not the governing principle. The principle was less eligibility, making relief less attractive than the lowest-paid labour."},{"text":"The New Poor Law 1834 used workhouses based on outdoor relief: relief should be less attractive than parish employment.","correct":false,"explanation":"Outdoor relief was assistance given outside workhouses and was restricted by the new system. Workhouses followed less eligibility, with relief made less attractive than lowest-paid labour."}]},{"id":"024a7ba7-cc04-4407-8771-cd2bb9f5bb8e","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What type of work did the Mines Act 1842 ban for women, girls and boys under ten?","back":"Underground work.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Underground work.","correct":true,"explanation":"The Mines Act 1842 prohibited all women and girls, along with boys under ten, from working underground in coal mines."},{"text":"Factory work.","correct":false,"explanation":"Factory employment was regulated through separate Factory Acts rather than prohibited by the Mines Act. The 1842 legislation banned these groups from underground work."},{"text":"Agricultural work.","correct":false,"explanation":"Agricultural labour was outside the scope of the Mines Act. The Act responded to conditions in mines by banning women, girls and boys under ten from underground work."},{"text":"Domestic service.","correct":false,"explanation":"Domestic service was not covered by mining legislation and remained a major source of female employment. The Mines Act specifically prohibited underground work for the named groups."}]},{"id":"2c9e572f-0181-4340-958d-8ae0c7b2ec4d","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Why was the New Poor Law strongly opposed in northern industrial areas?","back":"Unemployment was cyclical, not simply idleness.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Unemployment was cyclical, not simply idleness.","correct":true,"explanation":"Northern industrial workers often lost employment during trade downturns beyond their control, so a system designed to punish supposedly idle individuals appeared harsh and unsuitable."},{"text":"Unemployment was voluntary, not caused by trade.","correct":false,"explanation":"This repeats the assumption used to justify deterrent workhouses. Northern opponents argued that unemployment was cyclical and caused by industrial downturns, not voluntarily chosen idleness."},{"text":"Poverty was agricultural, not industrial.","correct":false,"explanation":"Northern opposition was particularly strong because poverty there arose from fluctuating industrial employment. Critics stressed that unemployment was cyclical rather than evidence of personal idleness."},{"text":"Relief was generous, not sufficiently deterrent.","correct":false,"explanation":"The claim that relief needed stronger deterrence supported the New Poor Law rather than northern opposition. Opponents argued that cyclical unemployment made its punitive assumptions inappropriate."}]},{"id":"1123e019-6765-490c-94a2-91433092dcf3","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What suffrage demand was central to the People's Charter 1838?","back":"Universal male suffrage.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Universal male suffrage.","correct":true,"explanation":"The People’s Charter demanded the vote for all adult men, alongside annual Parliaments, secret ballots, equal constituencies, paid MPs and an end to MPs’ property qualifications."},{"text":"Universal female suffrage.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although some Chartist women were politically active, votes for women were not among the Charter’s six points. Its central franchise demand was universal male suffrage."},{"text":"Household male suffrage.","correct":false,"explanation":"Household suffrage would still exclude men without qualifying households. The People’s Charter went further by demanding universal male suffrage for adult men."},{"text":"Property-based male suffrage.","correct":false,"explanation":"A property-based franchise preserved the restriction Chartists opposed. The Charter sought universal male suffrage and separately demanded abolition of the property qualification for MPs."}]},{"id":"25ed9ae8-9560-4356-a16c-364efab05f35","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What was Chartism's lasting political significance?","back":"It created a national working-class political movement and kept democratic reform alive.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It created a national working-class political movement and kept democratic reform alive.","correct":true,"explanation":"Chartism united working-class activists around a national political programme. Although its petitions failed, its organisation and ideas sustained pressure for later democratic reform."},{"text":"It created a national middle-class free-trade movement and secured immediate democratic reform.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Anti-Corn Law League, not Chartism, was the leading middle-class free-trade movement. Chartism organised workers nationally and kept reform alive without winning immediate change."},{"text":"It created a local artisanal protest movement and ended demands for democratic reform.","correct":false,"explanation":"Chartism extended beyond isolated artisans to become a national working-class movement. Its failure did not end democratic demands, since its programme influenced later reform campaigns."},{"text":"It created a national working-class trade union and abolished property qualifications.","correct":false,"explanation":"Chartism was a broad political movement rather than a trade union, and it did not itself abolish MPs’ property qualifications. Its lasting importance lay in sustaining democratic reform."}]}]}],"examCountdown":{"examDate":"2027-05-12","paperLabel":"Paper 1"},"heading":"From Pitt to Peel 1783–1853","title":"From Pitt to Peel 1783–1853 Flashcards","topbar":{"backHref":"/as-level/history/ocr/flashcards"},"topicSidebar":"$L37"}]}],"topicId":"a85da9bb-3984-5548-a10e-dc1daca3c8ba","walled":"$L38"}],"$L39","$L3a"]