Skip to content

Course home

Responses to people in need

Responses to people in need

EasyMediumHard
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
Question 47

Piliavin et al. (1969) implemented strict standardisation in their 'Subway Samaritan' field experiment to maintain internal validity. However, because the study was conducted in a natural setting on a live New York transit line, several extraneous variables remained uncontrolled. Which of the following represents an uncontrolled environmental or participant variable that threatened the internal validity of their study?

A

The specific time interval of 70 seconds70\text{ seconds}70 seconds after departure at which the victim collapsed.

B

The physical appearance, dress, and standardized posture of the victim across all trials.

C

The potential for commuters to experience repeated exposure to different trials on the same transit route.

D

The specific subway line, carriage layout, and location of the collapse next to the metal pole.

Markscheme

Responses to people in need Questions

  1. A Level
  2. /Psychology
  3. /Responses to people in need

105 exam-style questions on OCR A Level Psychology Responses to people in need, covering Piliavin et al. (1969): Subway Samaritan and Levine et al. (2001): Cross-cultural altruism. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank