Skip to content

Course home

Responses to people in authority

Responses to people in authority

EasyMediumHard
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465
Question 21

An investigator compiled data from several variations of Stanley Milgram's research into obedience to examine how physical proximity (of both the learner and the authority figure) influenced the percentage of participants who administered the maximum voltage of 450V.

Experimental ConditionPercentage of participants administering maximum shock (450V)
Condition X: Baseline procedure (Experimenter present in room, learner in adjacent room)65%
Condition Y: Proximity variation (Learner positioned in the same room as the participant)40%
Condition Z: Remote instruction variation (Experimenter leaves the room and gives orders via telephone)20.5%

Using the data in the table above, outline two conclusions that can be drawn about how proximity affects obedience.

[4]
Markscheme

Responses to people in authority Questions

  1. A Level
  2. /Psychology
  3. /Responses to people in authority

128 exam-style questions on OCR A Level Psychology Responses to people in authority, covering Milgram (1963): Obedience and Bocchiaro et al. (2012): Disobedience and whistle-blowing. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.

Question bank