A team of forensic psychologists investigated whether the socio-economic status (SES) of a defendant impacts jury decision-making. They compared guilty versus not-guilty verdicts for defendants classified as having either a high or low SES. The researchers calculated a Chi-squared value of 4.15 with df=1df = 1df=1 for a two-tailed hypothesis.
Analyse the results of the Chi-squared test using the table below to show whether the defendant's socio-economic status significantly affected jury verdicts.
| Level of significance for a one-tailed test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.0005 | |
| Level of significance for a two-tailed test | ||||||
| df | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.001 |
| 1 | 1.64 | 2.71 | 3.84 | 5.02 | 6.64 | 10.83 |
| 2 | 3.22 | 4.61 | 5.95 | 7.38 | 9.21 | 13.82 |
120 exam-style questions on Edexcel A Level Psychology Content, covering Biological explanations of crime, Social explanations of crime, Cognitive and ethical interview techniques, Psychological formulation of offending, Cognitive-behavioural treatment for offenders, Biological treatment for offenders, Factors influencing eye-witness testimony, Factors influencing jury decision-making, Individual differences, and Developmental psychology. Each one has a worked solution and a mark scheme showing where the marks go.