t-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/16rg_4fc.tboh.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/0gb0hsyesaojy.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/0fv.isp.n05qf.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/0ets~720cedz1.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/05m.~2lhurf79.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/114y8hk363nlj.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/055o43hu.7muk.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122","/_next/static/chunks/023yop42dw50-.js?dpl=nogit-1787642122"],"TopicQuestionBank"] 42:T44d,- Defines statistical infrequency as behaviour that is statistically rare or numerically uncommon, typically falling at either extreme of a normal distribution curve B1 - Identifies that under this definition, any trait or behaviour that is infrequent is classified as abnormal B1 - Applies this to Maya, explaining that her synesthesia is abnormal under this definition because it is exceptionally rare (fewer than $0.1\%$ of the population), despite her leading a fulfilling life A1 - Defines failure to function adequately as an inability to cope with the ordinary demands of day-to-day living, such as maintaining nutrition, personal hygiene, or employment B1 - Identifies key indicators of failing to function, such as experiencing personal distress, maladaptive behaviour, or causing distress/discomfort to observers B1 - Applies this to Jacob, explaining that his severe anxiety prevents him from leaving his home, working, or feeding himself, which represents an inability to meet basic daily demands A143:T559,- Outlines one alternative definition of abnormality (e.g. deviation from social norms, deviation from ideal mental health, or statistical infrequency) B1 - Explains the core premise of the chosen definition clearly (e.g. violating implicit/explicit rules of society; absence of criteria representing psychological well-being; behaviour that is statistically rare) B1 - Provides further specific detail or example of the chosen definition (e.g. Jahoda's criteria such as autonomy/integration/resisting stress; behaviour at the extreme ends of a normal distribution curve) B1 - Offers one evaluation point (strength or limitation) for the chosen definition (e.g. cultural relativism, unrealistically high standards, or the inability to distinguish desirable/undesirable traits) M1 - Elaborates on this evaluation point to explain its impact or limitation (e.g. social norms vary between cultures and generations; most people would be classified as abnormal at some point; high IQ is rare but positive) M1 - Provides a second distinct evaluation point or further deepens the evaluation (e.g. risk of abusing the definition to control non-conformist behaviour; cultural bias towards individualistic autonomy; some individuals are untroubled by their statistically rare condition) A144:T571,- Outlines a first definition of abnormality (e.g., failure to function adequately, defined as being unable to cope with the ordinary demands of day-to-day life) B1 - Details a further feature of this first definition (e.g., Rosenhan and Seligman's criteria such as personal distress, observer discomfort, or maladaptive behaviour) B1 - Applies this first definition to Theresa (e.g., she is failing to function adequately as she has stopped going to her teaching job, avoids social contact, and experiences distress/ritualistic cleaning) A1 - Outlines a second definition of abnormality (e.g., deviation from social norms, defined as behaviour that violates the explicit or implicit rules of a society; or deviation from ideal mental health, defined as lacking criteria for optimum psychological well-being) B1 - Details a further feature of this second definition (e.g., social norms being context and culture-dependent; or Jahoda's criteria of ideal mental health such as autonomy and accurate perception of reality

Definitions of abnormality

Question 3

Definitions of abnormality Questions

Definitions of abnormality

Question 3

Definitions of abnormality Questions