32:I[196793,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wptr05dvvad-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0shhrr8zrsvma.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0j1q2_fxvgx28.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32i_8fssnjnil.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1oz24qjw4uq89.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0itrgb6vzmww0.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947"],"Gingerbread"] 34:I[647935,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wptr05dvvad-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0shhrr8zrsvma.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0j1q2_fxvgx28.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32i_8fssnjnil.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1oz24qjw4uq89.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0itrgb6vzmww0.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947"],"RecordResourceResume"] 35:I[830476,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wptr05dvvad-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0shhrr8zrsvma.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0j1q2_fxvgx28.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32i_8fssnjnil.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1oz24qjw4uq89.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0itrgb6vzmww0.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947"],"FlashcardAccessBranch"] 36:I[315438,["/_next/static/chunks/075vy1fh16gh5.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/060-i_62-vse1.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2epfhfe5im7r6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2yhf9vq09dqoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0p4rexedanx97.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0u008gt6051u7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1odwrcl12kfnl.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zkcxwtbsqliz.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/316m85d5s15pp.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_itvjgqsumf8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wptr05dvvad-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3r5hh4t0jf4es.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ml3vooxhiupb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1h4wccj42vygd.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12xoy6h_w_le6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2os7nxouq91eq.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ht89vb0p09bm.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ocoqwe4aht_u.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32qmkt01ta8b2.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3jpl-42mbad5n.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bbv7o2-m-0ni.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/097slu7xaeast.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0shhrr8zrsvma.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0j1q2_fxvgx28.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/14kf-an-d2n-e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0v4byuex1x38h.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0mgw5qzpc_1eu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/09_ag440ieydu.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0gvj8_2lj8s8m.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/04zr-wqafvwoa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0llqhg6-bxn_b.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2ydqdr10ndcei.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ku-vdy4ggo41.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2dx-vzwyw9a3g.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/32i_8fssnjnil.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2eoustw-nfu98.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1oz24qjw4uq89.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0k-y_4mcfub-p.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0itrgb6vzmww0.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/00ol_16j3a2oa.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0odk_0my0_b5-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0dbk553rgd90s.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0aq3eylxphp57.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2srfni4gkx9g6.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3k8iy5tn80za8.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2hccrcvndngge.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3h4suq-9gmzwh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/12mv6p8rwcl5o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1bt82o91jhwht.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1nnw6yom6-qhh.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2vg15qyptj-oc.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2_vtmw66zj1j7.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0ep4vrgb00zlb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2s1hkstzlmj2o.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2wp4esku6l29e.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/43ajf4ofaeu5y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1lsxkfxy262n-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0zg1om_k0m5zv.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1__39-dgg7p8-.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2gb4dscyul4eg.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1y5xmyjgu8grb.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/2y341-r8ncizo.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0kpd0j3i_7yor.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/1ksyn9m68446d.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/0sf7rskx57j6y.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3wqp-h5xnebw9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/3ghbpnibq2fva.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947","/_next/static/chunks/30dopbgd1dkf9.js?dpl=nogit-1790172947"],"TopicFlashcardRunner"] 23:[["$","$L32",null,{"feature":"flashcards"}],"$L33",["$","$L34",null,{"href":"/a-level/law/aqa/rules-in-human-rights-law/flashcards","label":"Rules in Human Rights law","subjectCode":"a_level_law__aqa","surface":"flashcards"}],["$","$L35",null,{"runner":["$","div",null,{"className":"min-h-0 flex-1 overflow-hidden bg-background","children":["$","$L36",null,{"decks":[{"id":"f72c98d3-11b0-4e33-8a60-d67901ca8a7e","title":"Rules in Human Rights law Flashcards","topicId":"1caecc98-281b-5d00-992b-82c5ed17b6d6","topicSlug":"rules-in-human-rights-law","cards":[{"id":"ac39067c-e96a-4496-b808-5a669b5177a9","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"In an HRA claim, what does s6 HRA 1998 make unlawful?","back":"A public authority acting incompatibly with a Convention right.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A public authority acting incompatibly with a Convention right.","correct":true,"explanation":"Section 6 makes it unlawful for a public authority to act incompatibly with Convention rights, unless primary legislation requires the authority to act that way."},{"text":"A private individual acting incompatibly with a Convention right.","correct":false,"explanation":"Section 6 does not generally impose Convention duties directly on private individuals. It makes incompatible action by a public authority unlawful, including action by some bodies performing public functions."},{"text":"A public authority acting incompatibly with any international treaty.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses Convention rights incorporated by the HRA with international treaties generally. Section 6 specifically makes public authorities’ acts unlawful when they are incompatible with a Convention right."},{"text":"A court issuing a declaration that legislation is incompatible.","correct":false,"explanation":"A declaration of incompatibility is a lawful remedy under s4, not unlawful conduct under s6. Section 6 instead prohibits a public authority from acting incompatibly with a Convention right."}]},{"id":"34da5315-9624-48e6-8fd9-3e1d3b123f4d","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Under s7 HRA 1998, a claimant must usually be a [ ] of the breach.","back":"Under s7 HRA 1998, a claimant must usually be a victim of the breach.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"victim","correct":true,"explanation":"Section 7 uses the victim test for standing, meaning the claimant must be directly affected by the alleged Convention rights breach rather than merely having a general interest."},{"text":"witness","correct":false,"explanation":"Witnessing an alleged breach does not by itself provide standing under s7. The claimant must usually be a victim who is directly affected by the Convention rights violation."},{"text":"taxpayer","correct":false,"explanation":"Taxpayer status alone is insufficient under the HRA, despite potentially showing a public interest. Section 7 usually requires the claimant to be a victim of the alleged breach."},{"text":"campaigner","correct":false,"explanation":"Campaigning about a human rights issue does not automatically satisfy the HRA standing rule. Under s7, the claimant must usually be a victim directly affected by the breach."}]},{"id":"a7d0129e-8746-46ec-80c1-491308b4c8ed","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What must UK courts do with ECtHR decisions under s2 HRA 1998?","back":"They must take them into account.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They must take them into account.","correct":true,"explanation":"Section 2 requires UK courts to consider relevant ECtHR judgments and other specified Strasbourg material, although those decisions are not formally binding precedents in domestic law."},{"text":"They must follow them as binding precedents.","correct":false,"explanation":"This mistakes Strasbourg decisions for binding domestic precedents. Section 2 requires UK courts to take relevant ECtHR decisions into account, not automatically follow every decision."},{"text":"They must disregard them unless Parliament approves.","correct":false,"explanation":"Parliamentary approval is not required before a court considers Strasbourg case law. Section 2 expressly requires UK courts to take relevant ECtHR decisions into account."},{"text":"They must refer every dispute to Strasbourg.","correct":false,"explanation":"Domestic courts determine HRA claims themselves and do not refer every dispute to the ECtHR. Their s2 duty is to take relevant Strasbourg decisions into account."}]},{"id":"d693309a-4c95-4028-bd0b-832b7b838ecf","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Under s3 HRA 1998, courts must interpret legislation compatibly with Convention rights [ ].","back":"Under s3 HRA 1998, courts must interpret legislation compatibly with Convention rights so far as possible.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"so far as possible","correct":true,"explanation":"Section 3 requires courts to interpret primary and subordinate legislation compatibly with Convention rights so far as possible, using a strong interpretative duty while respecting fundamental statutory features."},{"text":"only if the wording is ambiguous","correct":false,"explanation":"This wrongly limits s3 to traditional ambiguity. The interpretative duty can require departure from an apparently ordinary meaning, provided a compatible reading is possible without contradicting a fundamental statutory feature."},{"text":"only where Parliament expressly permits","correct":false,"explanation":"Section 3 itself supplies the interpretative duty, so express permission in each Act is unnecessary. Courts must seek a compatible interpretation so far as possible."},{"text":"regardless of the statutory language","correct":false,"explanation":"Section 3 is powerful but does not permit courts to adopt an interpretation that contradicts a fundamental feature of the legislation. Compatibility is required only so far as possible."}]},{"id":"086d4095-8935-42b0-a4a6-853d7951ad38","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What is the legal effect of an s4 declaration of incompatibility?","back":"It declares incompatibility, but the Act remains legally valid.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"It declares incompatibility, but the Act remains legally valid.","correct":true,"explanation":"A declaration under s4 formally identifies incompatibility but does not affect the legislation’s validity, operation or enforcement. Parliament decides whether and how to amend the law."},{"text":"It strikes down the Act, making it immediately unenforceable.","correct":false,"explanation":"This imports a constitutional strike-down power that UK courts do not receive under s4. A declaration identifies incompatibility, but the Act remains legally valid and enforceable."},{"text":"It amends the legislation, replacing incompatible wording automatically.","correct":false,"explanation":"A court cannot rewrite legislation through an s4 declaration. The declaration leaves the Act valid, while Parliament may later amend it through ordinary legislation or a remedial order."},{"text":"It suspends the legislation, until Parliament makes it compatible.","correct":false,"explanation":"An s4 declaration does not suspend the legislation or compel an immediate parliamentary response. It declares incompatibility while leaving the Act legally valid and operative."}]},{"id":"13ab0d01-3775-4fc8-8360-141bd6ab7581","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What remedy power does s8 HRA 1998 give courts?","back":"Courts may award a remedy, including damages if appropriate.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Courts may award a remedy, including damages if appropriate.","correct":true,"explanation":"Section 8 allows courts to grant relief or remedies within their existing powers. Damages are discretionary and awarded only when necessary to provide just satisfaction."},{"text":"Courts must award damages whenever a breach is established.","correct":false,"explanation":"This treats damages as automatic compensation, but s8 makes them discretionary. Courts may grant an appropriate remedy and award damages only when necessary for just satisfaction."},{"text":"Courts may issue a declaration that automatically invalidates legislation.","correct":false,"explanation":"This confuses remedial powers with legislative strike-down. Courts may grant appropriate relief under s8, but even an s4 declaration does not automatically invalidate primary legislation."},{"text":"Courts may award a remedy, but damages are never available.","correct":false,"explanation":"Section 8 expressly permits damages where the court considers them necessary for just satisfaction. Other remedies may be preferred, so damages are available but not automatic."}]},{"id":"962db409-4c97-4efe-a251-6c9faa2fe6b7","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Article 2 and Article 5 are treated as [ ] rights; Article 8, Article 10 and Article 11 are [ ] rights.","back":"Article 2 and Article 5 are treated as limited rights; Article 8, Article 10 and Article 11 are qualified rights.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Article 2 and Article 5 are treated as limited rights; Article 8, Article 10 and Article 11 are qualified rights.","correct":true,"explanation":"Articles 2 and 5 permit interference only in specifically defined circumstances, making them limited rights. Articles 8, 10 and 11 contain broader qualification clauses requiring justification."},{"text":"Article 2 and Article 5 are treated as absolute rights; Article 8, Article 10 and Article 11 are qualified rights.","correct":false,"explanation":"The second classification is correct, but Articles 2 and 5 are limited rather than absolute because their texts permit interference in specifically defined circumstances."},{"text":"Article 2 and Article 5 are treated as limited rights; Article 8, Article 10 and Article 11 are absolute rights.","correct":false,"explanation":"Articles 2 and 5 are correctly described as limited, but Articles 8, 10 and 11 are qualified because their texts permit justified interference meeting specified conditions."},{"text":"Article 2 and Article 5 are treated as qualified rights; Article 8, Article 10 and Article 11 are limited rights.","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the classifications. Articles 2 and 5 contain narrowly specified limitations, while Articles 8, 10 and 11 allow qualified interference subject to legality, legitimate aim and necessity."}]},{"id":"f5d57fc5-6794-46c4-8a24-da67f9c91673","cardType":"basic","points":3,"front":"For Articles 8, 10 and 11, what must the state justify?","back":"

Legal basis for the interference
Legitimate aim pursued
Necessity in a democratic society

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Legal basis for the interference
Legitimate aim pursued
Necessity in a democratic society

","correct":true,"explanation":"Interference with these qualified rights must be prescribed by law, pursue an aim listed in the relevant Article, and be necessary and proportionate in a democratic society."},{"text":"

Parliamentary approval for the interference
Public support for the measure
Administrative convenience for the state

","correct":false,"explanation":"Political approval, popularity and convenience do not satisfy the qualified-rights test. The state must establish a legal basis, a legitimate aim and necessity in a democratic society."},{"text":"

Legal basis for the interference
Any public purpose pursued
Reasonableness in official opinion

","correct":false,"explanation":"A legal basis alone is insufficient, and not every public purpose qualifies. The state must pursue a specified legitimate aim and prove objective necessity and proportionality in a democratic society."},{"text":"

Judicial permission for the interference
Financial aim pursued
Absolute necessity in every case

","correct":false,"explanation":"Prior judicial permission and a financial objective are not the general Article tests, while absolute necessity sets the wrong standard. The requirements are legality, legitimate aim and democratic necessity."}]},{"id":"e99b1516-67c8-4760-9eb6-8f3fbec8f132","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Proportionality means interference must go [ ] to achieve a legitimate aim.","back":"Proportionality means interference must go no further than necessary to achieve a legitimate aim.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"no further than necessary","correct":true,"explanation":"The interference must be limited to what is necessary to achieve the legitimate aim. Any additional impact on the protected right would be disproportionate."},{"text":"as far as reasonably possible","correct":false,"explanation":"This suggests that some additional interference may be acceptable, but proportionality requires stopping once the necessary level has been reached. The correct term is “no further than necessary”."},{"text":"only to the minimum possible","correct":false,"explanation":"Proportionality does not require interference to be reduced to the smallest imaginable level, only to what is necessary for the legitimate aim. The correct term is “no further than necessary”."},{"text":"as far as required by the state","correct":false,"explanation":"This reverses the proportionality test by suggesting extensive interference is permitted. The interference must instead go no further than necessary to achieve the legitimate aim."}]},{"id":"eeabb09e-a290-422e-89b9-063aa2b6325e","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Under Article 2.2, what threshold applies to state use of force?","back":"Force must be no more than absolutely necessary.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Force must be no more than absolutely necessary.","correct":true,"explanation":"Article 2 protects life especially strongly, so state force causing a risk to life must be no more than absolutely necessary in the circumstances."},{"text":"Force must be no more than reasonably necessary.","correct":false,"explanation":"The ordinary proportionality language is a lower threshold than Article 2 requires. The correct test is that force must be no more than absolutely necessary."},{"text":"Force must be proportionate to the legitimate aim.","correct":false,"explanation":"This omits the crucial requirement of absolute necessity, making the threshold too lenient. Article 2 requires force to be no more than absolutely necessary."},{"text":"Force must be necessary and effective.","correct":false,"explanation":"Article 2 does not permit force whenever it is merely useful or effective. The strict threshold is that force must be no more than absolutely necessary."}]},{"id":"982838a6-0e64-454e-91bc-a041e27ba95d","cardType":"basic","points":3,"front":"When does the Article 2 positive operational duty arise under Osman?","back":"

Authorities knew or ought to know of the risk
Risk was real and immediate
They failed to take reasonable measures

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Authorities knew or ought to know of the risk
Risk was real and immediate
They failed to take reasonable measures

","correct":true,"explanation":"Osman requires authorities to have known or ought to have known of a real and immediate risk, yet failed to take reasonable measures within their powers."},{"text":"

Authorities suspected of the risk
Risk was possible and foreseeable
They failed to take exceptional measures

","correct":false,"explanation":"A merely speculative or remote danger does not satisfy Osman. The correct test requires authorities to know or ought to know of a real and immediate risk and fail to take reasonable measures."},{"text":"

Authorities actually knew of the risk
Risk was general and continuing
They failed to take all possible measures

","correct":false,"explanation":"The duty is not triggered by actual knowledge alone or by a general danger. Osman requires a real and immediate risk, plus failure to take reasonable measures."},{"text":"

Authorities confirmed the risk
Risk was certain and imminent
They failed to take maximum measures

","correct":false,"explanation":"Osman does not demand certainty or every conceivable protective action. The correct requirements are knowledge, or constructive knowledge, of a real and immediate risk and failure to take reasonable measures."}]},{"id":"e1d7e609-a59c-4e15-8e4f-25ae22033e56","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Rabone shows Article 2’s operational duty can apply to a [ ] at risk of suicide.","back":"Rabone shows Article 2’s operational duty can apply to a voluntary psychiatric patient at risk of suicide.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"voluntary psychiatric patient","correct":true,"explanation":"Rabone extended the operational duty beyond detained patients: a voluntary psychiatric patient may also be within the state’s protective responsibility when at serious risk of suicide."},{"text":"compulsorily detained patient","correct":false,"explanation":"Rabone is significant because the patient was not compulsorily detained. The correct term is “voluntary psychiatric patient”, showing the duty can apply without compulsory detention."},{"text":"general hospital inpatient","correct":false,"explanation":"The case concerned psychiatric care rather than an ordinary hospital admission. The correct term is “voluntary psychiatric patient”, who may still attract Article 2 protection."},{"text":"prisoner serving a sentence","correct":false,"explanation":"The patient’s vulnerability arose in a psychiatric setting, not from being a prisoner. The correct term is “voluntary psychiatric patient” at risk of suicide."}]},{"id":"87c5f477-4f31-41c8-8e6c-de6ca274d190","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What Article 2 duty arises where the state may be responsible for a death?","back":"A duty to hold an effective investigation.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"A duty to hold an effective investigation.","correct":true,"explanation":"Where state authorities may have contributed to a death, Article 2 imposes a procedural duty to conduct an effective investigation capable of establishing what happened and accountability."},{"text":"A duty to hold an automatic inquest.","correct":false,"explanation":"An inquest may form part of the response, but Article 2 requires an investigation meeting effectiveness standards, not simply any inquest. The correct answer is an effective investigation."},{"text":"A duty to bring an automatic prosecution.","correct":false,"explanation":"A criminal prosecution is not always required, because the investigation must first establish the relevant facts and possible responsibility. The correct answer is a duty to hold an effective investigation."},{"text":"A duty to conduct a public inquiry.","correct":false,"explanation":"A public inquiry is only one possible investigative mechanism and is not mandatory in every case. Article 2 requires a duty to hold an effective investigation."}]},{"id":"af3cd32c-5e51-4b44-b703-70d1f5c2fd76","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"How does Guzzardi assess whether there is a deprivation of liberty?","back":"By the restriction’s type, duration, effects and manner.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"By the restriction’s type, duration, effects and manner.","correct":true,"explanation":"Guzzardi adopts a fact-sensitive approach: deprivation of liberty is assessed by considering the restriction’s type, duration, effects and manner, rather than one factor alone."},{"text":"By the restriction’s location, duration, purpose and authority.","correct":false,"explanation":"Location alone cannot determine whether Article 5 applies, because a restriction may amount to detention even outside a conventional prison. The correct approach considers type, duration, effects and manner."},{"text":"By the restriction’s severity, consent, motive and outcome.","correct":false,"explanation":"The legal assessment is broader than the person’s subjective reaction or the state’s stated intention. Guzzardi requires consideration of type, duration, effects and manner."},{"text":"By the restriction’s legal label, duration, staffing and place.","correct":false,"explanation":"A formal detention order is not essential, and the number of officers is not determinative. Guzzardi uses the restriction’s type, duration, effects and manner."}]},{"id":"9d5d8cb6-91d9-40e2-9727-2cd7c0050b4f","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Article 5.3 requires [ ]; in Brogan, detention for [ ] without it breached Article 5.3.","back":"Article 5.3 requires prompt judicial control; in Brogan, detention for over four days without it breached Article 5.3.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Article 5.3 requires prompt judicial control; in Brogan, detention for over four days without it breached Article 5.3.","correct":true,"explanation":"Article 5.3 requires prompt judicial control over detention. In Brogan, holding the applicants for over four days without that control breached the requirement."},{"text":"Article 5.3 requires prompt administrative review; in Brogan, detention for over four days without it breached Article 5.3.","correct":false,"explanation":"Article 5.3 requires judicial control, not merely administrative review. Brogan concerned detention for over four days without prompt judicial control, which breached Article 5.3."},{"text":"Article 5.3 requires prompt judicial control; in Brogan, detention for three days without it breached Article 5.3.","correct":false,"explanation":"The relevant period in Brogan was over four days, not a shorter period. The correct rule is prompt judicial control, and detention beyond that period without it breached Article 5.3."},{"text":"Article 5.3 requires prompt judicial control; in Brogan, detention for one week without it breached Article 5.3.","correct":false,"explanation":"Brogan did not establish that a week was the relevant threshold. Article 5.3 requires prompt judicial control, and the case involved detention for over four days without it."}]},{"id":"85796c73-4fa7-46b8-a621-fdfc91062935","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"Under s24 PACE 1984, what two requirements must justify arrest?","back":"

Reasonable grounds
Necessity of arrest

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

Reasonable grounds
Necessity of arrest

","correct":true,"explanation":"Section 24 PACE requires both reasonable grounds for suspecting an offence and reasonable grounds for believing arrest is necessary. Both requirements must be satisfied."},{"text":"

Reasonable suspicion
Proportionality of arrest

","correct":false,"explanation":"Reasonable suspicion is relevant to the first requirement, but arrest also needs necessity. The correct pair is reasonable grounds and necessity of arrest."},{"text":"

Judicial warrant
Urgency of arrest

","correct":false,"explanation":"A warrant is not generally required under section 24, and urgency does not replace the statutory necessity test. The correct requirements are reasonable grounds and necessity of arrest."},{"text":"

Proof of guilt
Public interest of arrest

","correct":false,"explanation":"Evidence of guilt is not required before arrest, but the statutory grounds and necessity tests are. The correct requirements are reasonable grounds and necessity of arrest."}]},{"id":"73e60a78-32a2-40ee-82f0-a57f09db83c7","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Article 8.1 protects respect for [ ], [ ], home and correspondence.","back":"Article 8.1 protects respect for private life, family life, home and correspondence.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Article 8.1 protects respect for private life, family life, home and correspondence.","correct":true,"explanation":"Article 8.1 expressly protects respect for private life, family life, the home and correspondence. These four interests form the scope of the qualified right under Article 8."},{"text":"Article 8.1 protects respect for private property, family life, home and correspondence.","correct":false,"explanation":"The first term is a property-law concept rather than the Article 8 wording. The correct protected interest is private life, alongside family life, home and correspondence."},{"text":"Article 8.1 protects respect for private life, family home, home and correspondence.","correct":false,"explanation":"Family home is not one of the four separate interests listed in Article 8.1. The correct second term is family life, which is broader than protection of a residence."},{"text":"Article 8.1 protects respect for personal life, family relations, home and correspondence.","correct":false,"explanation":"These phrases sound similar but are not the Convention’s wording. Article 8.1 protects private life and family life, together with the home and correspondence."}]},{"id":"94fb97e1-a3c4-4bdb-8541-fef073011187","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Why did telephone tapping breach Article 8 in Malone?","back":"The law lacked sufficient clarity.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"The law lacked sufficient clarity.","correct":true,"explanation":"In Malone, the telephone-tapping arrangements were not set out with sufficient clarity in domestic law. This meant the interference was not adequately foreseeable and breached Article 8."},{"text":"The law lacked parliamentary approval.","correct":false,"explanation":"The key defect was not simply the absence of a new Act of Parliament. Malone required sufficient clarity and safeguards in the legal rules governing interception, which were missing."},{"text":"The law lacked judicial authorisation.","correct":false,"explanation":"A lack of prior judicial authorisation was not the precise basis of the decision. The central problem was that the law lacked sufficient clarity about telephone tapping."},{"text":"The law lacked public consultation.","correct":false,"explanation":"Public consultation is not the Article 8 requirement identified in Malone. The interception regime breached the right because its legal basis lacked sufficient clarity and foreseeability."}]},{"id":"feeb90fc-3b8c-40ea-a290-f7acb0c37a47","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What did S and Marper decide about retaining DNA and fingerprints from unconvicted people?","back":"Indefinite retention breached Article 8.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Indefinite retention breached Article 8.","correct":true,"explanation":"S and Marper held that retaining DNA profiles and fingerprints from unconvicted people indefinitely was disproportionate. The blanket policy therefore breached Article 8’s protection of private life."},{"text":"Indefinite retention did not breach Article 8.","correct":false,"explanation":"The Court rejected the argument that indefinite, blanket retention was acceptable for everyone arrested. It held that the policy was disproportionate and breached Article 8."},{"text":"Indefinite retention breached Article 6.","correct":false,"explanation":"The case concerned privacy and the retention of personal data, so the relevant right was Article 8 rather than Article 6. The correct conclusion was a breach of Article 8."},{"text":"Indefinite retention was required by Article 8.","correct":false,"explanation":"Article 8 does not require the indefinite retention of biometric data from unconvicted people. S and Marper found that this blanket approach was disproportionate and breached Article 8."}]},{"id":"385242d6-ec33-4d56-bd14-213f61b49f9a","cardType":"cloze","points":null,"front":"Handyside says Article 10 protects ideas that [ ].","back":"Handyside says Article 10 protects ideas that offend, shock or disturb.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"offend, shock or disturb","correct":true,"explanation":"Handyside established that Article 10 protects not only agreeable opinions but also ideas that offend, shock or disturb. This reflects the importance of pluralism and tolerance in a democratic society."},{"text":"inform, persuade or entertain","correct":false,"explanation":"These describe common purposes of communication, but they are not the phrase from Handyside. The case protects ideas that offend, shock or disturb, including unpopular expression."},{"text":"threaten, harass or intimidate","correct":false,"explanation":"Threatening, harassing or intimidating conduct may justify restrictions, but this is not Handyside’s formulation. The protected ideas are those that offend, shock or disturb."},{"text":"criticise, question or oppose","correct":false,"explanation":"Political criticism and opposition may receive Article 10 protection, but these are not the specific words used in Handyside. The recognised formulation is offend, shock or disturb."}]},{"id":"791afb21-ed40-4678-a6b4-310967a1432c","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"When Article 8 and Article 10 clash, what rule comes from Re S?","back":"Neither has automatic priority; the court applies proportionality.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Neither has automatic priority; the court applies proportionality.","correct":true,"explanation":"Re S rejected an automatic hierarchy between Articles 8 and 10. When they conflict, the court balances the rights by applying proportionality to the particular facts."},{"text":"Article 8 has automatic priority; the court limits expression.","correct":false,"explanation":"Re S did not give Article 8 automatic priority over freedom of expression. The court must balance both rights and decide whether the interference is proportionate in context."},{"text":"Article 10 has automatic priority; privacy is secondary.","correct":false,"explanation":"Freedom of expression is not automatically superior to privacy under Re S. Neither right has automatic priority, so proportionality determines the lawful outcome."},{"text":"Neither has any legal priority; the court applies strict liability.","correct":false,"explanation":"Although neither right has automatic priority, the court does not apply strict liability. It uses proportionality to balance the competing Article 8 and Article 10 interests."}]},{"id":"12bc9579-1957-4f67-bca6-e4e45f8f1297","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"What negative aspect of Article 11 was shown in Young, James and Webster?","back":"Forced union membership can breach Article 11.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Forced union membership can breach Article 11.","correct":true,"explanation":"Young, James and Webster confirmed that freedom of association includes a negative aspect: people should not be forced to belong to a trade union. Compulsory membership can therefore breach Article 11."},{"text":"Voluntary union membership can breach Article 11.","correct":false,"explanation":"Article 11 generally protects the choice to join an association voluntarily. Young, James and Webster concerned the negative freedom not to be forced into union membership."},{"text":"Refusal to join a union can breach Article 11.","correct":false,"explanation":"Refusing compulsory membership is part of the protected negative freedom of association, not normally a breach. The case held that forced union membership can breach Article 11."},{"text":"Public union meetings can breach Article 11.","correct":false,"explanation":"The case was not about the location or openness of union meetings. Its important principle was that compulsory membership of a union can violate the negative aspect of Article 11."}]},{"id":"dc5cc3fb-ef7b-4202-807a-a03e23dd40ad","cardType":"basic","points":3,"front":"Under the Public Order Act 1986, which sections control processions and assemblies?","back":"

s11: advance notice for processions
s12: conditions on processions
s14: conditions on assemblies

","mcqOptions":[{"text":"

s11: advance notice for processions
s12: conditions on processions
s14: conditions on assemblies

","correct":true,"explanation":"The Public Order Act 1986 uses s11 for advance notice of processions, s12 for conditions on processions and s14 for conditions on assemblies. These provisions regulate different stages and forms of public protest."},{"text":"

s11: advance notice for assemblies
s12: conditions on processions
s14: conditions on assemblies

","correct":false,"explanation":"The mistake is assigning s11 to assemblies. Section 11 concerns advance notice for processions, while s12 concerns processional conditions and s14 concerns assembly conditions."},{"text":"

s11: advance notice for processions
s12: conditions on assemblies
s14: conditions on processions

","correct":false,"explanation":"Sections 12 and 14 have been reversed. Section 12 permits conditions on processions, whereas section 14 permits conditions on assemblies; section 11 covers procession notice."},{"text":"

s11: conditions on processions
s12: advance notice for processions
s14: advance notice for assemblies

","correct":false,"explanation":"This option confuses notice requirements with police powers to impose conditions. Section 11 covers advance notice for processions, s12 conditions on processions and s14 conditions on assemblies."}]},{"id":"d3b9f7ac-2812-499a-99c9-4084511ade43","cardType":"basic","points":1,"front":"Why was the police action unlawful in Laporte?","back":"They turned protesters away before a breach of the peace was imminent.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"They turned protesters away before a breach of the peace was imminent.","correct":true,"explanation":"In Laporte, the police acted before a breach of the peace was imminent. Preventive action at that early stage was unlawful because the common-law power had not yet arisen."},{"text":"They turned protesters away after a breach of the peace was imminent.","correct":false,"explanation":"The police may have had stronger grounds once a breach was imminent, but in Laporte they acted too early. The breach was not yet imminent when the protesters were stopped."},{"text":"They turned protesters away before a breach of the peace was likely.","correct":false,"explanation":"Likely is not the controlling threshold identified in Laporte. The police acted unlawfully because the breach of the peace was not yet imminent, the required stage for intervention."},{"text":"They turned protesters away before a breach of the peace was certain.","correct":false,"explanation":"The law does not require a breach of the peace to be certain before intervention. However, Laporte found the action premature because the breach was not yet imminent."}]},{"id":"331eb9bd-8865-457a-a4c6-62bb7cd4e2b4","cardType":"basic","points":2,"front":"What must courts assess before convicting peaceful protesters under Ziegler?","back":"Whether conviction is proportionate under Articles 10 and 11.","mcqOptions":[{"text":"Whether conviction is proportionate under Articles 10 and 11.","correct":true,"explanation":"The court must assess whether convicting the protesters is a proportionate interference with their rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly under Articles 10 and 11."},{"text":"Whether the protest was authorised by the police under Articles 10 and 11.","correct":false,"explanation":"Police authorisation is not the decisive test in Ziegler. The key issue is whether conviction would be a proportionate interference with Articles 10 and 11 rights."},{"text":"Whether the protesters caused serious physical harm under Articles 10 and 11.","correct":false,"explanation":"The absence of serious physical harm does not determine the issue. Courts must balance the protesters’ rights against the effects of their conduct and assess proportionality."},{"text":"Whether the protesters acted with dishonest intent under Articles 10 and 11.","correct":false,"explanation":"Dishonesty is not the required human-rights assessment under Ziegler. The court must decide whether criminal conviction is proportionate when it interferes with protected expression and assembly."}]}]}],"examCountdown":{"examDate":"2027-05-20","paperLabel":"Paper 1"},"heading":"Rules in Human Rights law","title":"Rules in Human Rights law Flashcards","topbar":{"backHref":"/a-level/law/aqa/flashcards"},"topicSidebar":"$L37"}]}],"topicId":"1caecc98-281b-5d00-992b-82c5ed17b6d6","walled":"$L38"}],"$L39","$L3a"]